Mass Information Requests during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Psychological Determinants and Specific Features
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-2-427-437
Abstract
The present research featured on-line behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. As the situation escalated, the number of information requests related to the pandemic decreased, and the content characteristics of search queries became relatively independent from official statements of the Russian government. Early in the epidemic, the content of mass search queries shifted towards positive information as a result of the counter-regulation effect, which required the introduction of personal and situational predictors into the analysis. The main stage of the research revealed an obvious personal / collective dichotomy
and the ambivalent nature of risk assessment, responsibility attribution, and subjective control. COVID-19 patients and healthy users demonstrated little difference in the on-line search behavior; however, the difference in their current affective state was quite significant. The problem-oriented strategies of proactive coping (reflexive, strategic, and preventive coping) were connected with emotional preferences in information search, while personal involvement was one of awareness parameters.
Keywords
information search,
mindfulness,
proactive coping,
affective states,
counterregulation effect,
subjective control
Supporting agencies: The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 19-18-00516 "Transitive and virtual spaces – similarities and differences".
About the Authors
E. P. Belinskaya
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
https://publons.com/researcher/2675973
E. A. Stolbova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
E. O. Tsikina
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Nestik T. A. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on society: socio-psychological analysis. Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoy akademii nauk. Sotsialnaya i ekonomicheskaia psikhologiya, 2020, 5(2): 47–83. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.38098/ipran.sep.2020.18.2.002
2. Fetzer T., Witte M., Hensel L., Jachimowicz J. M., Haushofer J., Ivchenko A., Caria S., Reutskaja E., Roth C., Fiorin S., Gomez M., Kraft-Todd G., Goetz F. M., Yoeli E. Measuring worldwide COVID-19 attitudes and beliefs. 2020. Available at: https://osf.io/3sn2k/ (accessed 2 Apr 2021).
3. Akimenko G. V., Kirina Yu. Yu., Nacheva L. V., Seledtsov A. M. Psychology of the epidemic: how a pandemic (COVID-19) affects the psyche of people. Humanities and social sciences bulletin, 2020, 1(4): 45–54. (In Russ.)
4. Enikolopov S. N., Boyko O. M., Medvedeva T. I., Vorontsova O. U., Kazmina O. U. Dynamics of psychological reactions at the start of the pandemic COVID-19. Psychological-Educational Studies, 2020, 12(2): 102–126. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2020120207
5. Kharlamenkova N. E., Bykhovets Iu. V., Dan M. V., Nikitina D. A. Experiencing uncertainty and anxiety in during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2020. Available at: http://www.ipras.ru/cntnt/rus/institut_p/covid-19/kommentarii-eksp/har-1.html (accessed 15.04.2021). (In Russ.)
6. Rasskazova E. I., Leontiev D.A., Lebedeva A. A. Pandemic as a challenge to subjective well-being: anxiety and coping. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya, 2020, 28(2): 90–108. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2020280205
7. Jacobson N. C., Lekkas D., Price G., Heinz M., Song M., O’Malley A. J., Barr P. J. Flattening the mental health curve: COVID-19 stay-at-home orders result in alterations in mental health search behavior in the United States. JMIR Mental Health, 2020, 7(6). DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/24v5b
8. Montemurro N. The emotional impact of COVID-19: from medical staff to common people. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 2020, 87: 23–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.03.032
9. Karpova E. B., Nikolaeva E. A. Negative psycho-emotional consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in risk groups. National Psychological Journal, 2020, (3): 66–74. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.11621/npj.2020.0310
10. Lukovtseva Z. V. The COVID-19 pandemic as a social stressor: psychological and psychiatric risk factors (based on foreign studies). Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo, 2020, 11(4): 13–25. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17759/sps.2020110402
11. Baranova V. A., Dubovskaya E. M., Savina O. O. Life experience and resources for overcoming the difficulties of social isolation in the first period of the COVID-19 pandemic among students. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo, 2021, 12(1): 10–25. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17759/sps.2021120102
12. Yaremchuk S. V., Bakina A. V. Subjective well-being in early adulthood and psychological distance to the objects of the sociopsychological space during COVID-19 pandemic. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo, 2021, 12(1): 26–43. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17759/sps.2021120103
13. Yu H., Li M., Li Z., Xiang W., Yuan Y., Liu Y., Li Z., Xiong Z. Coping style, social support and psychological distress in the general Chinese population in the early stages of the COVID-19 epidemic. BMC Psychiatry, 2020, 20. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02826-3
14. Rasskazova E. I., Emelin V. A., Tkhostov A. Sh. Radical beliefs about the causes, manifestations and consequences of coronavirus: the psychological content and their relationship with behavior. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya, 2020, (2): 62–82. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.11621/vsp.2020.02.04
15. Fancourt D., Bu F., Wan Mak H., Steptoe A. Covid-19 Social Study. 2020, 48. Available at: https://allcatsrgrey.org.uk/wp/download/public_health/3d9db5_d663978c3aa743b69751b3fb2c4a864b.pdf (accessed 2 Apr 2021).
16. Barros J. M., Melia R., Francis K., Bogue J., O’Sullivan M., Young K., Bernert R. A., Rebholz-Schuhmann D., Duggan J. The validity of Google Trends search volumes for behavioral forecasting of national suicide rates in Ireland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(17). DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16173201
17. Greving H., Sassenberg K. Threatened individuals prefer positive information during Internet search: An experimental laboratory study. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2018, 12(1). DOI: 10.5817/CP2018-1-6
18. Belinskaya E. P., Stolbova E. A., Tsikina E. O. The dynamics of information search queries about COVID-19 at the selfisolation stage. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo, 2020, 11(4): 105–119. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17759/sps.2020110408
19. Brooks S. K., Webster R. K., Smith L. E., Woodland L., Wessely S., Greenberg N., Rubin G. J. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet, 2020, 395: 912–920. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
20. Kubrak T. A., Latynov V. V. Opportunities and limitations of information-psychological influence in the situation of the coronavirus pandemic. Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoy akademii nauk. Sotsialnaya i ekonomicheskaia psikhologiya, 2020, 5(2): 84–114. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.38098/ipran.sep.2020.18.2.003
21. Tkhostov A. Sh., Rasskazova E. I. Psychological contents of anxiety and the prevention in an infodemic situation: protection against coronavirus or the "vicious circle" of anxiety? Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya, 2020, 28(2): 70–89. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2020280204
22. Haass R. The pandemic will accelerate history rather than reshape it. Not every crisis is a turning point. Foreign Affairs, 07.04.2020. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-04-07/pandemic-will-acceleratehistory-rather-reshape-it accessed 2 Apr 2021).
23. Nestik T. A., Nikolaev E. L. Relationship between attitudes to global risks, fears of personal death, and proactive coping: an empirical study. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 2020, 17(4): 812–821. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17323/1813-8918-2020-4-812-821
24. Belinskaya E. P., Djuraeva M. R. The relationship between proactive coping with difficult life situations and the level of mindfulness: a cross-cultural analysis. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2021, 11(1): 48–62. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.21638/spbu16.2021.103
25. Keng S.-L., Choo X., Tong E. M. V. Association between trait mindfulness and variability of coping strategies: a diary study. Mindfulness, 2018, 9(5): 1423–1432. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-018-0885-4
26. Osin E. N. Measuring positive and negative affect: development of a Russian-language analogue of PANAS. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 2012, 9(4): 91–110. (In Russ.)
27. Belinskaya E. P., Vecherin A. V., Agadullina E. R. Proactive coping inventory: adaptation to a non-clinical sample and the predictive capability. Klinicheskaia i spetsial'naia psikhologiia, 2018, 7(3): 192–211. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17759/cpse.2018070312
28. Jemmot J. B., Ditto P. H., Croyle R. N. Judging health status: effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 50(5): 899–905. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.50.5.899
Review
For citations:
Belinskaya E.P., Stolbova E.A., Tsikina E.O. Mass Information Requests during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Psychological Determinants and Specific Features. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2021;23(2):427-437. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-2-427-437
Views:
523
Email this article 