Attitudes to Lockdown in Students with Different Indicators of Responsibility and Value Orientations
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-1-174-182
Abstract
The empirical study featured the attitude of students to restrictive measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. The paper introduces various patterns of attitudes that adolescents with different indicators of value orientations and personal express to the lockdown. An authentic questionnaire with emotional, cognitive, and behavioral blocks was used to define the dominant attitude, A. I. Krupnov’s test – to study the responsibility patterns, and Sh. Schwartz's questionnaire – to describe the system of values. The obtained results made it possible to identify some coping strategies in respondents with different personal qualities. Certain dominant values and the level of responsibility proved to be able to determine a positive or negative attitude to the lockdown. By taking into account the age and personal qualities of the population, authorities one can develop better preventive measures in future.
Keywords
About the Authors
S. I. Kudinov
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey I. Kudinov
Moscow
S. S. Kudinov
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Stanislav S. Kudinov
Moscow
V. S. Kudinov
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladislav S. Kudinov
Moscow
References
1. Maslow A. Toward a Psychology of Being. Moscow: Refl-buk; Kiev: Vakler, 1997, 304. (In Russ.)
2. Rubinshtein S. L. Being and consciousness. Man and the world. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2003, 508. (In Russ.)
3. Leontiev A. N. Activity. Consciousness. Personality. Moscow: Politizdat, 1975, 304. (In Russ.)
4. Ananiev B. G. Man as a subject of knowledge, 3rd ed. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2001, 288. (In Russ.)
5. Myasishchev V. N. Personality structure and human attitude to reality. Psychology of personality, eds. Gippenreiter Yu. B., Puzirey A. A. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, 1982, 35–38. (In Russ.)
6. Krasnoryadtseva O. M. Value determination of professional behavior of teachers. Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal, 1998, (7): 25–29. (In Russ.)
7. Yanitskiy M. S. Value orientations of a person as a dynamic system. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2000, 204. (In Russ.)
8. Yanitskiy M. S. System of value orientations of personality and social communities: structural and dynamic model and its application in psychological research and psychological practice. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2020, 22(1): 194–206. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-1-194-206
9. Seryy A. V., Yanitskiy M. S., Kharchenko E. V. Valuable and semantic aspects of psychological work with the student's youth which is in the crisis situation. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2014, (2): 40–48. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15293/2226-3365.1402.04
10. Momov V. M. Man, morality, and education: theoretical and methodological problems. Moscow: Progress, 1975, 163. (In Russ.)
11. Aybazova S. R. The role of the value-semantic orientation in the dynamics of personality self-realization. Cand. Psyhol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Moscow, 2015, 22. (In Russ.)
12. Volkova E. V., Bashkatov S. A., Chernyshova L. V. Review of responsibility studies in Russian and foreign psychology of the 21st century. Vestnik of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics, 2019, 25(4): 53–59. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.34216/2073-1426-2019-25-4-53-59
13. Krupnov A. I. The system-dispositional approach to studying the personality and its properties. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 2006, (1): 63–73. (In Russ.)
14. Falakh Rasmi A.-R. M. Ethnopsychological features of responsibility in Arab and Russian students. Cand. Psychol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Moscow, 1997, 16. (In Russ.)
15. Kurenkov I. A. Psychological features of responsibility in various groups of teachers. Cand. Psychol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Moscow, 1994, 22. (In Russ.)
16. Kudinov S. I., Kudinov S. S., Sedova I. V. Role of responsibility in emotional burnout of teachers at initial stage of professionalization. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 2016, (1): 26–41. (In Russ.)
17. Gavrilushkin S. A. Responsibility as the professional quality ofpersonality. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2011, (1): 155–157. (In Russ.)
18. Pryadein V. P. Responsibility, effort and will as objects of psychological and pedagogical research. Nauchnyi dialog, 2012, (1): 32–45. (In Russ.)
19. Dementiy L. I., Kupchenko V. E. Life strategy of individuals with various type of the responsibility. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta, 2011, (4): 317–324. (In Russ.)
20. Bykov S. V. Socio-psychological regulation of personality responsibility. Dr. Psyhol. Sci. Diss. Kazan, 2006, 337. (In Russ.)
21. Berndsen M., Manstead A. S. R. On the relationship between responsibility and guilt: Antecedent appraisal or elaborated appraisal? European Journal of Social Psychology, 2007, 37(4): 774–792. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.397
22. Cehajic-Clancy S., Effron D. A., Halperin E., Liberman V., Ross L. D. Affirmation, acknowledgment of in-group responsibility, group-based guilt, and support for reparative measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011, 101(2): 256–270. DOI: 10.1037/a0023936
23. Zimmermann A., Abrams D., Doosje B., Manstead A. S. R. Causal and moral responsibility: Antecedents and consequences of group-based guilt. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2011, 41(7): 825–839. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.826
24. Glavas A. Corporate social responsibility and organizational psychology: an integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016, 7(144): 1–13. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00144
Review
For citations:
Kudinov S.I., Kudinov S.S., Kudinov V.S. Attitudes to Lockdown in Students with Different Indicators of Responsibility and Value Orientations. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2021;23(1):174-182. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-1-174-182
Views:
574
Email this article 