S. Dovlatov’s Aphorisms: Structural and Semantic Features
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-4-1134-1142
Abstract
The research featured theoretical issues of aphorism as a linguistic phenomenon. The article introduces its main semantic and stylistic characteristics that distinguish it from other phenomena, e.g. proverbs, idioms, sayings, quotations, etc. Linguists define aphorism as a literary genre, a sphere of knowledge, and a linguistic phenomenon. The present study focused on the linguistic approach to aphorisms coined by S. Dovlatov. Aphorisms are certified, reproducible, separable, concise, and have concept words. The authors studied the keywords the aphorisms are based on, related graphic and expressive means, and the structure of contextual aphorisms. S. Dovlatov's aphorisms proved to be contextual, since he never published aphorisms as a separate book. In his Compromise and March of the Lonely, the authors distinguished aphorisms and aphoristic utterances, which differed in structure Aphorisms consisted of one to three sentences, while aphoristic utterances included up to five sentences. S. Dovlatov’aphorisms included the following semantic features. For instance, they could be divided into thematic groups, e.g. "journalism", "freedom", "lie vs. truth", "moral qualities", "attitude to life", etc., with corresponding keywords, e.g. "decent person", "scoundrel", "provocateur", "journalist", etc. Another distinctive semantic feature was the active use of different stylistic devices, e.g. gradation, epithet, metonymy, etc., which verbalized emotions. In addition, S. Dovlatov often used contextual synonyms and antonyms. Most aphorisms revealed their implicit semantics only if the reader shared common background knowledge with the author. The structural features included comparative constructions, verb-noun phrases, and elliptic constructions as a marker of implicit semantics and catalyst of the reader's experience. The use of aphorisms could be attributed to the features of Dovlatov's creative manner. However, their ironic tone become clear only if the reader shares the same cultural code with the author. Further studies may be based on a linguacultural approach to S. Dovlatov's aphorisms.
About the Authors
O. M. Kholomeenko
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Rostov-on-Don
Russian Federation
Rostov-on-Don
A. I. Kvitko
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Rostov-on-Don
Russian Federation
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Ermakovich E. E. Aphorism. Effective speech communication (basic competencies), ed. Skovorodnikov A. P. Krasnoyarsk: SFU, 2014, 69. (In Russ.)
2. Zemlianskaia E. V. Structural-semantic and functional features of stylistic intertextuality in English aphorism. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. St. Petersburg, 2004, 209. (In Russ.)
3. Furstenberg I. Aphorism. Great Soviet Encyclopedia. Moscow: Sov. entsikl., 1970, vol. 2, 434. (In Russ.)
4. Nalichnikova I. A. Aphorism as a genre, compact text and universal statement. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2016, (4-3): 121–123. (In Russ.)
5. Kalashnikova N. M. Aphorism as a feature of V. Tokareva's idiostyle. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Rostov-on-Don, 2004, 246. (In Russ.)
6. Korolkova A. V. Aphoristic in the context of Russian culture. Smolensk: Izd-vo SmolGU, 2018, 226. (In Russ.)
7. Gavrin S. G. Aphoristic phraseology as a linguistic category. Uchenye zapiski Permskogo gos. ped. in-ta, 1971, 87: Questions of theory and methodology of the Russian language: 3–23. (In Russ.)
8. Roizenzon L. I. Lectures on general and Russian phraseology. Samarkand, 1973, 223. (In Russ.)
9. Olshanskyi I. G., Melnikova O. V. A philological study of aphorisms. Vestnik of Moscow state linguistic university, 2009, (559): 63–81. (In Russ.)
10. Kryachkov D. A. Language aphorism as a means of representing the speaker in American political discourse: Based on the material of the 2000 election campaign. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Moscow, 2002, 24. (In Russ.)
11. Polchaninova E. O. Aphorism in phraseology and phraseology in the aphoristics of the modern German language: linguaculturological aspect. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Moscow, 2012, 22. (In Russ.)
12. Shulezhkova S. G. Russian language's winged expressions, their source, and development. Moscow: Azbukovnik, 2002, 286. (In Russ.)
13. Dmitrieva O. A. Cultural and linguistic characteristics of proverbs and aphorisms: based on the material of the French and Russian languages. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Volgograd, 1997, 189. (In Russ.)
14. Ivanov E. E. Linguistics of aphorism. Mogilev: MGU im. A. A. Kuleshova, 2016, 156. (In Russ.)
15. Molchkova L. V. Models of repetition in phraseology. Aktualnye voprosy sovremennoi nauki, 2013, (28): 194–202. (In Russ.)
16. Avdeeva A. S., Vodovatova T. E. Aphorisms: concept, linguistic status, structural and semantic properties. Vestnik Mezhdunarodnogo instituta rynka, 2017, (2): 127–134. (In Russ.)
17. Korolkova A. V. Aphoristics: research methodology diversity. Izvestiya SmolGU, 2019, (3): 117–129. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.35785/2072-9464-2019-47-3-117-129
18. Fedorenko N. T., Sokolskaia L. I. Aphoristics. Moscow: Nauka, 1990, 419. (In Russ.)
19. Nesterova N. M., Koryukina N. V. The issue of cross-cultural translatability of the comic (the case of Sergey Dovlatov's story "Compromise"). Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Linguistics, 2007, (1): 9–12. (In Russ.)
20. Zykova V. E. Precedence phenomena in Sergei Dovlatov's idiostyle. Lingvoritoricheskaia paradigma: teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty, 2015, (20): 168–172. (In Russ.)
21. Davletshina S. R. The irony function in S. D. Dovlatov's prose. Uralskii filologicheskii vestnik. Seriia: Draft: molodaia nauka, 2017, (5): 65–72. (In Russ.)
22. Dobrozakova G. A. Historical anecdote from the XVIII century to Dovlatov. Problems of studying Russian literature of the XVIII century, ed. Shchukina G. O. St. Petersburg-Samara: OOO "Nauchno-tekhnicheskii tsentr", 2019, iss. 18, 38–57. (In Russ.)
23. Zaytsceva S. A. Cultural approach to understanding value component in literary work of S. Dovlatov "The compromise". Society: philosophy, history, culture, 2017, (2): 106–110. (In Russ.)
24. Korolkova A. V. Aphoristics A. P. Chekhov. Scientific notes of Orel State University, 2018, (4): 160–165. (In Russ.)
25. Korolkova A. V. Aphoristics of I. S. Turgenev. Scientific notes of Orel State University, 2019, (2): 113–116. (In Russ.)
26. Khlupina M. A. The word journalist in the assessment of the units of predicate vocabulary (on the material of S. Dovlatov's prose). Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Russian Philology, 2012, (6): 34–38. (In Russ.)
27. Dobrycheva A. A. Features of the syntactic organization of Sergei Dovlatov’s prose. Bulletin of the Cherepovets State University, 2011, (4-1): 57–60. (In Russ.)
28. Krasnykh V. V. Welcomed among strangers: myth or reality? Moscow: Gnozis, 2003, 375. (In Russ.)
29. Kartashova E. P. Aphorisms in innovative prose by V. V. Rozanov. Vestnik of the Mari State University, 2016, 10(3): 85–88. (In Russ.)
30. Borisova M. Yu. Russian aphorism: linguistic conflict and its formal indicators. Baltic Humanitarian Journal, 2017, 6(3): 11–14. (In Russ.)
31. Karasik V. I. Culture generating texts: functions, genres, authors. Social'nye i gumanitarnye znanija, 2020, 6(1): 82–91. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18255/2412-6519-2020-1-82-91
Review
For citations:
Kholomeenko O.M., Kvitko A.I. S. Dovlatov’s Aphorisms: Structural and Semantic Features. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2020;22(4):1134-1142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-4-1134-1142
Views:
571
Email this article 