Literary Concept of Dog: Dog’s Death Scenario in American Mass Fiction
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-4-1116-1125
Abstract
About the Authors
N. V. RabkinaRussian Federation
Kemerovo
O. V. Valko
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
References
1. Maslova V. A. Poet and culture: concept sphere of Marina Tsvetaeva. Moscow: Flinta, 2004, 256. (In Russ.)
2. Dobrikova К. А. Bestiary in the national picture of the world. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Chelyabinsk, 2005, 215. (In Russ.)
3. Butina А. А. The role of the inner form of phraseological sentences and phrases for the description of the structure of a zooconcept. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriia 9. Filologiia. Vostokovedenie. Zhurnalistika, 2011, (4): 107–109. (In Russ.)
4. Butina А. А. Concepts CAT and DOG in the English linguistic picture of the world. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. St. Petersburg, 2012, 253. (In Russ.)
5. Vorontsova Т. I., Slobodskaya А. V. The linguistic representation of the zoo concepts "cat" and "dog" in the English literary tale. Problems of modern philology and linguodidactics. St. Petersburg: RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena, 2014, 8–12. (In Russ.)
6. Abakumova I. А., Stepanova S. I. Linguacultural analysis of the English paremies with the "pets" zonimic component. Explorer of the Year 2020: Proc. III Intern. Sci.-Research Competition, Petrozavodsk, April 5, 2020. Petrozavodsk: Novaia Nauka, 2020, 306–309. (In Russ.)
7. Skitina N. А. Lingua-cognitive analysis of phraseological units with a zoonym (based the Russian, English, and German languages). Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Moscow, 2007, 20. (In Russ.)
8. Ganiyeva E. S., Ismailova S. А. Phraseological units with the zoonym component in Crimean Tatar and English languages: linguacultural aspect. Questions of the Crimean Tatar philology, history and culture, 2016, (3): 25–29. (In Russ.)
9. Kulkova М. А., Galimullina R. I. A cognitive – discurse study of paroemiological units with a zoonym component in the English and Russian languages. Philology and Culture, 2015, (3): 82–88. (In Russ.)
10. Goddard C. A semantic menagerie: the conceptual semantics of ethnozoological categories. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 2018, 22(3): 539–559. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-3-539-559
11. Egorova А. V. Names of animate and inanimate nature in axiological and conceptological aspects (based on the proverbial and proverbial fund of the English language). Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Ivanovo, 2006, 22. (In Russ.)
12. Beliaeva I. V. The interpreting nature of phraseological units with the zoonym component. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki, 2019, (3): 103–109. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2019-3-103-109
13. Lyzlov A. I. The axiological dimension zoomorphic phraseological units. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2017, (6): 67–77. (In Russ.)
14. Lyzlov A. I. Evaluative potential of zoonymic concepts in English phraseological units on the example of publicist texts. Vestnik MGPU. Ser.: Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoe obrazovanie, 2019, (4): 44–50. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25688/2076-913X.2019.36.4.05
15. Sharova A. A. Zoomorphisms as a means of representation of gender concepts in the English linguistic culture. Jaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik, 2010, 1(3): 144–148. (In Russ.)
16. Agafonova O. I. Metaphorical model "politics is animal world" in political discourse (based on American and British online media). Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Belgorod, 2012, 23. (In Russ.)
17. Gimadeeva A. A. The concept of "happiness" in Tatar and English phraseological units with a zoonym. Topical issues of education and science: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Tambov, January 31, 2018. Tambov: Konsaltingovaia kompaniia Iukom, 2018, pt. 3, 35–36. (In Russ.)
18. Antonova A. B. The role of zoonyms in representation of notional, image-bearing and evaluative aspects of the concept DRINKING. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, 2010, (4): 149–155. (In Russ.)
19. Kotova N. S. Linguaculturological features of English color names. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2007, (8): 32–37. (In Russ.)
20. Molchanova G. G. Cognitive dissonance as a transactional mechanism of the urbanonimic formation. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2018, (1): 8–16. (In Russ.)
21. Bobyleva N. I., Evseeva O. V. The semiotics of "wolf-dog-man" relations and their reflection in the culture's. Znenie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 2014, (2): 91–101. (In Russ.)
22. Erofeeva I. V., Bocharnikov V. N. Dog as gestalt in hunter's linguistic view of the world: specialized magazine discourse. Humanitarian Vector, 2019, 14(1): 30–40. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-1-30-40
23. Erofeeva I. V., Bocharnikov V. N. Concept "dog" in the discourse of hunting magazines. Sciences of Europe, 2019, (37-3): 32–35. (In Russ.)
24. Brukvina V. A. Experience of structure description of zooconcepts in military slang. Izv. Volgogr. gos. ped. un-ta, 2014, (5): 20–23. (In Russ.)
25. Aleksandrova Yu. M., Gorshunov Yu. V. Author's metaphors and similes based on the dog image in the works by Gerald Durrell. Vestnik BashGU, 2016, 21(3): 698–705. (In Russ.)
26. Kochelorova Yu. К. Translation of idioms with zoonsemantic component dog deom Russian into English. Vestnik nauchnykh konferentsii, 2019, (7-2): 61–61. (In Russ.)
27. Metelskaya E. V. Image of man in English and Russian substrate linguacultures (based on English and Russian zoonyms). Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. 2012, 26. (In Russ.)
28. Marugina N. I. The concept "dog" as the element of the Russian linguage picture of the world. Yazyk i kul'tyra, 2009, (2): 11–30. (In Russ.)
29. Boldyrev N. N. Cognitive semantics: lectures in English philology. Tambov: Izd-vo TGU, 2001, 123. (In Russ.)
30. Shank R. C., Abelson R. P. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. N. Y.: Taylor & Francis, 1977, 266.
31. Lugovskoy A. V. Scenario concept of chase in English insular fiction. Language and Culture: Issues of modern philology and teaching languages at university: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Khabarovsk, May 15, 2014, Khabarovsk: TOGU, 2014, 265–270.
32. Eco U. Casablanca, or, The Clichés are Having a Ball. Maasik S., Solomon J. Signs of Life in the U.S.A.: Readings on Popular Culture for Writers. Boston: Bedford Books, 1994, 260–264.
33. Campbell J. Myths to Live By. Kiev, Moscow: Sofiia; Gelios, 2002, 256. (In Russ.)
34. Khramova M. N. Semantic of zoomorph images in modern European culture. Cand. Cultural Studies Sci. Diss. St. Petersburg, 2015, 206. (In Russ.)
35. Rabkina N. V. The concept of unfreedom in Stephen King’s works. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2012, (4-4): 112–115. (In Russ.)
36. Vanacker H. Death in a Catheral. The Low Countries 18: Arts and Society in Flanders and the Netherlands, 2011, 18: 282–283.
37. Weil E., Wolf G. K. Harlan Ellison: the edge of forever. Ohio State University Press, 2002, 276.
Review
For citations:
Rabkina N.V., Valko O.V. Literary Concept of Dog: Dog’s Death Scenario in American Mass Fiction. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2020;22(4):1116-1125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-4-1116-1125