Genus – Species and Whole – Part Relations in Legal Terms
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-4-1050-1060
Abstract
The research featured the way legal terms express the genus – species relationship (hyperonyms vs. hyponyms) and whole – part relationship (holonyms vs. meronyms / partonyms). The article introduces the basic differences in the relations of these types, as well as terminological variants. The author specified the related research terminology, the specific use of hyponyms / hyperonyms and holonyms / meronyms in the formation of a legislative definition, and the intra-text semantic correlation of concepts expressed by these relations. The author also defined the means and ways of expressing hyper-hyponymy and holonymy-meronymy: syntactic, grammatical, punctuation, numbering, graphic, speech markers, etc. The paper describes the main functions of legal hyponyms / hyperonyms and holonyms / meronyms: structuring the terminological system of law and the textual space of the law, official legal interpretation, the formation of an interpretation strategy, synonymous correlation, etc. It also mentions nominal (subject-conceptual, attributive) and verbal (procedural, effective) semantics. The research was based on the methods of conceptual, contextual, and comparative analysis of Russian legal texts, their classification and generalization. The research was based on Russian laws, as well as the Dictionary of Legislative Terms and Concepts, compiled by the author from federal laws.
References
1. Kiseleva S. V. The relationship of "part-whole" expressed by predicates of partitive semantics (cognitive aspect). Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena, 2006, 7(21-1): 57–71. (In Russ.)
2. Kottsova E. E. Hyponymical relations of verbs and nouns in the lexical system of the Russian language. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 2011, (6-2): 324–327. (In Russ.)
3. Kravchenko A. V. Language and perception. Cognitive aspects of linguistic categorization. Irkutsk: Izd-vo Irkut. un-ta, 1996, 159. (In Russ.)
4. Krysin L. P. Word in modern texts and dictionaries: essays on Russian vocabulary and lexicography. Moscow: Znak, 2008, 223–242. (In Russ.)
5. Loukachevitch N. V. Part-whole relations in theory and practice. Neurocomputers, 2013, (1): 7–12. (In Russ.)
6. Belov V. A. Semantic proximity of nouns in the cognitive aspect. Cherepovets: ChGU, 2018, 210. (In Russ.)
7. Goldberg V. B. Structural links in the lexical-semantic system of the language: On the material of Russian and English lexicalphraseological fields "Biological existence of man". Dr. Philol. Sci. Diss. Voronezh, 2000, 380. (In Russ.)
8. Krongauz M. A. Semantics, 2nd ed. Moscow: Academia, 2005, 350. (In Russ.)
9. Korzhuk A. N. Cognitive aspects of formation "part-whole" relation. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskiye yavleniya i protsessy, 2010, (6): 224–226. (In Russ.)
10. Semina I. A. Broad meaning and hyper-hyponymy as related phenomena. Language and reality. Scientific readings at the Department of Romance Languages V. G. Gak: Proc. III Intern. Conf., Moscow, March 22–24, 2018. Moscow: Sputnik+, 2018, vol. 3, 301– 307. (In Russ.)
11. Eliseeva E. P., Kornienko E. A. Methods of terminological definition (as in the case of linguistic terms). Lepta: an annual scientific and methodological almanac, eds. Glotova E. A., Prodanik N. V. Omsk: OmGPU, 2020, iss. 5, 35–39. (In Russ.)
12. Beldiian V. M., Batyushkina M. V. Fundamentals of the theory of language and speech. Omsk: OmGPU, 2016, 425. (In Russ.)
13. Bykova S. E. Thesaurus modeling of legal terminology (based on the French language in comparison with Russian). Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Ekaterinburg, 2006, 19. (In Russ.)
14. Denisova A. A. Semantics of terms in the general theory of law (paradigmatic aspect). Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Moscow, 1992, 16. (In Russ.)
15. Lavdarenko L. I., Ryabova L. G. Participants in criminal proceedings: legal and linguage aspects of some notions. Russian investigator, 2017, (22): 22–26. (In Russ.)
16. Myatchenko I. V. Lexical and semantic aspect of the legal metalanguage. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Krasnodar, 2000, 18. (In Russ.)
17. Ponkin I. V., Redkina A. I. Classification as a method of scientific research, particularly in jurisprudence. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki, 2017, 3(37): 249–259. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-37-249-259
18. Agamirov K. V. The compelled deviations and predictive gaps as categories of jurisprudence. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2019, (1): 18–26. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31857/S013207690003645-1
19. Lysyakova M. V. Syntagmatic potential of Russian synonyms and hyponyms. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 2004, (6): 143–150. (In Russ.)
20. Latu M. N. Verbal representation of systemic organization of political concepts in definitions. Political Linguistics, 2019, (1): 107–113. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.26170/pl19-01-12
21. Khantakova V. M., Dei T. M. Specific features of the "part-whole" relationship in a synonymic chain. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2017, (4): 41–46. (In Russ.)
22. Batyushkina M. V. On the legal concepts expressed in the names of the positive semantics in the -nest / -nie. Lepta: an annual scientific and methodological almanac, eds. Glotova E. A., Prodanik N. V. Omsk: OmGPU, 2020, iss. 5, 8–15. (In Russ.)
23. Miloslavsky I. G. Hyperonyms without hyponyms and hyponyms without hyperonyms in Russian. Semantic-discursive studies of language: explicit / implicit expression of meanings: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., Kaliningrad-Svetlogorsk, September 15–17, 2005. Kaliningrad: BFU im. I. Kanta, 2006, 53–61. (In Russ.)
24. Miloslavsky I. G. On the key words of modern Russian political discourse. Russkaia rech, 2017, (4): 50–60. (In Russ.)
25. Makovich G. V. Linguistic competences in legal analysis of laws. Scientific notes of the Kazan Law Institute of MIA of Russia, 2020, 5(1): 48–51. (In Russ.)
26. Plotnikova A. M. Nominations of socially vulnerable groups in legal space and outside it. Izvestia Ural Federal University Journal. Series 2: Humanities and Arts, 2019, 21(4): 209–218. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15826/izv2.2019.21.4.077
Review
For citations:
Batyushkina M.V. Genus – Species and Whole – Part Relations in Legal Terms. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2020;22(4):1050-1060. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-4-1050-1060
Views:
536
Email this article 