Assumptions of Self-Worth with a Different Attitudes to Personal Security Threats
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-4-992-999
Abstract
The present research featured the relationship between assumptions about self-worth as a characteristic of identity and the attitude to threats as part of general attitude to personal security. The study was based on R. Janoff-Bulman’s theory of basic assumptions and related methodology. Attitudes to personal security were assessed according to an authentic methodology as scores given to various threats. Assumptions of self-worth appeared to determine the values of threats in certain combinations with assumptions about the environment. For instance, respondents with high anxiety expressed a world-is-badbut-I-am-good kind of attitude, while those with lower anxiety possessed a world-is-bad-but-I-am-lucky attitude. However, identity as the relationship between ideas about one’s self and the environment needs further research. In addition, studies on identity as the key source of personal security attitudes is a promising research topic.
Keywords
assumptions,
self-image,
identity,
attitude to personal security,
perceptions of threats,
security psychology
Supporting agencies: The article was written with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) in the framework of the scientific project No. 19-013-00066 "The system of identity of the personality of young students: dynamics, factors, threats".
References
1. Ivanov M. S. Identity threats in the system of attitudes to personal security. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2019, 21(4): 974–981. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-4-974-981
2. Belinskaya E. P. Modern identity studies: From structural certainty to procedural incompleteness. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology and Education, 2018, 8(1): 6–15. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.101
3. Belinskaya E. P. The variability of self: an identity crisis or a crisis of knowledge about it? Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2015, 8(40). Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2015v8n43/1192-seryi43.html (accessed 10.11.2019). (In Russ.)
4. Belinskaya E. P. The problem of identity in modern social psychology. Cultural-historical approach: from L. S. Vygotsky to the XXI century, eds. Martsinkovskaya T. D., Orestova V. R., Gavrichenko O. V., Kiseleva E. A. Moscow: Tipografiia MPGU, 2018, 76–84. (In Russ.)
5. Asmolov A. G. Psychology of modernity: the challenges of uncertainty, complexity and diversity. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2015, 8(40). Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2015v8n40/1109-asmolov40.html (accessed 02.12.2017). (In Russ.)
6. Leontiev D. A. The challenge of uncertainty as the key issue of the psychology of personality. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2015, 8(40). Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2015v8n40/1110-leontiev40.html (accessed 02.12.2017). (In Russ.)
7. Bamberg M., De Fina A., Schiffrin D. Discourse and identity construction. Handbook of identity theory and research, eds. Schwartz S. J., Luyckx K., Vignoles V. L. N. Y.: Springer, 2011, 177–199. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_8
8. Martsinkovskaya T. D. Methodology of modern psychology: a change of paradigms?! Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2014, 7(36). Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2014v7n36/1012-martsinkovskaya36.html (accessed 02.12.2017). (In Russ.)
9. Benson C. The unthinkable boundaries of self: The role of negative emotional boundaries for the formation, maintenance, and transformation of identities. The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts, eds. Harré R., Moghaddam F. Westport: Praeger, 2003, 61–84.
10. Oyserman D., Destin M., Novin S. The context-sensitive future self: possible selves motivate in context, not otherwise. Self and Identity, 2014, 14(2): 173–188. DOI: 10.1080/15298868.2014.965733
11. Zaytseva Yu. E. Self-narrative as an instrument of identity construction: existential-narrative approach. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 16. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2016, (1): 118–136. (In Russ.)
12. McAdams D. P. Narrative identity. Handbook of identity theory and research, eds. Schwartz S. J., Luyckx K., Vignoles V. L. N. Y.: Springer, 2011, 99–115. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_5
13. Muravyeva O. I., Litvina S. A., Kruzhkova O. V., Bogomaz S. A. Russian young city-dwellers: structural features of urban identity. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2017, 7(1): 63–80. DOI: 10.15293/2226-3365.1701.05
14. Kimberg A. N. Psychology of personal safety: subject and problems in the perspective of the subjective approach. Chelovek. Soobshhestvo. Upravlenie, 2010, (1): 72–82. (In Russ.)
15. Baeva I. A. Psychological safety in education. St. Petersburg: Soiuz, 2002, 270. (In Russ.)
16. Dontsov A. I., Perelygina E. B., Zotova O. Yu., Mostikov S. V. Trust as a factor of psychological security in interethnic interaction. Social Psychology and Society, 2018, 9(2): 21–34. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17759/sps.2018090202
17. Krasnyanskaya T. M. Psychology of self-security. Pyatigorsk: PGLU, 2009, 279. (In Russ.)
18. Krasnyanskaya T. M., Tylets V. G. Fractal approach to the interpretation of psychological safety of the person. European Journal of Psychological Studies, 2015, (2): 48–57. DOI: 10.13187/ejps.2015.6.48
19. Fomenko G. Yu. Psychology of personal security: theoretical and methodological foundations of institutionalization. Chelovek. Soobshhestvo. Upravlenie, 2010, (1): 83–99. (In Russ.)
20. Ivanov M. S., Seryy A. V., Yanitskiy M. S. Mobility as strategy of providing personal security in postmodern society. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences: Intern. Conf. on research paradigms transformation in social sciences, Tomsk, May 18–21, 2017. Future Academy, 2018, vol. 35, 1187–1196. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2018.02.140
21. Ivanov M. S., Yanitskiy M. S. Attitude to personal security: concept, structure, value variation. Psychology of relations in the post-non-classical paradigm: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Belovo, June 1–7, 2015. Belovo, 2015, 54–68. (In Russ.)
22. Janoff-Bulman R. Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: Application of schema construct. Social Cognition, 1989, 7(Special Issue: Social Cognition and Stress): 113–136.
23. Bogomaz S. A., Gladkikh A. G. Psychological safety and its measurement with the scale of basic beliefs. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2009, (318): 191–194. (In Russ.)
24. Ivanov M. S. Ensuring personal safety as a problem of psychology of the way of life, self-realization and personal identity. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2015, (3-3): 128–133. (In Russ.)
25. Padun M. A., Kotel’nikova A. V. Modification of R. Janoff-Bulman’s procedure for personality basic beliefs study. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2008, 29(4): 98–106. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Ivanov M.S. Assumptions of Self-Worth with a Different Attitudes to Personal Security Threats. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2020;22(4):992-999. https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-4-992-999
Views:
532
Email this article 