Latent Profiles Analysis of Personal Determinants of Overcoming Adversity (Russian and Uzbek Samples)
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-4-972-981
Abstract
The article introduces an analysis of latent profiles of personal determinants of overcoming adversity. The research included 989 Russian respondents aged 18–78 years and 272 Uzbek respondents aged 18–48. The study involved the following methods: Proactive Coping Questionnaire (PCI), Uncertainty Tolerance Questionnaire (MSTAT–II), Positive and Negative Emotions Questionnaire (PANAS). The statistical analysis of latent profiles (LPA) made it possible to describe the best model, which included five latent profiles. This model demonstrated similar profiles in the Russian and Uzbek samples. Profiles with high proactive, reflexive, preventive coping, and strategic planning values accompanied by low social and emotional support values, had a high level of positive and low values of negative decompensation. Profiles with low proactive, reflexive, preventive coping, and strategic planning values combined with high social and emotional support values were associated with high problem avoidance, low tolerance to uncertainty, and a negative decompensation.
Supporting agencies: This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No. 19-013-00612 "Intercultural analysis of personal and situational determinants of overcoming adversity".
References
1. Sirota N. A., Yaltonsky V. M. Application and implementation of rehabilitation and prevention programs for addictive behavior as an urgent task of Russian clinical psychology. Med. psihol. Ross., 2012, (2): 72–74. (In Russ.)
2. Nartova-Bochaver S. K. "Coping behavior" in the system of concepts of personality psychology. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 1997, 18(5): 20–30. (In Russ.)
3. Pearlin L. I., Schooler C. The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1978, 19(1): 2–21. DOI: 10.2307/2136319
4. Folkman S., Lazarus R. S. The relationship between coping and emotion: Implications for theory and research. Social Science & Medicine, 1988, 26(3): 309–317. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90395-4
5. Skinner E. A., Edge K., Altman J., Sherwood H. Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 2003, 129(2): 216–269. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216
6. Israel B. A., House J. S., Schurman S. J., Heaney C. A., Mero R. P. The relation of personal resources, participation, influence, interpersonal relationships and coping strategies to occupational stress, job strains, and health: A multivariate analysis. Work and Stress, 1989, 3(2): 163–194. DOI: 10.1080/02678378908256942
7. Schwarzer R. Proactive Coping Theory. Paper presented at the 20th International Conference of the Stress and Anxiety Research Society (STAR). Cracow, Poland, July 12–14, 1999.
8. Billings A. G., Moos R. H. Coping, stress and social resources among adults with unipolar depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 46(4): 877–891. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.46.4.877
9. Greenglass E., Fiksenbaum L., Eaton J. The relationship between coping, social support, functional disability and depression in the elderly. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 2006, 19(1): 15–31. DOI: 10.1080/14659890500436430
10. Folkman S., Aldwin C., Lazarus R. The relationship between locus of control, cognitive appraisal and coping. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA, August, 1981.
11. O'Neill C. P., Zeichner A. Working women: A study of relationships between stress, coping and health. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1985, 4(2): 105–116. DOI: 10.3109/01674828509085266
12. Perrewe P. L., Ganster D. C. The impact of job demands and behavioral control on experienced job stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1989, 10(3): 213–229. DOI: 10.1002/job.4030100303
13. Folkman S. Personal control, stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 46(4): 839–852. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.46.4.839
14. Dunkel-Schetter C., Feinstein L. G., Taylor S. E., Falke R. L. Patterns of coping with cancer. Health Psychology, 1992, 11(2): 79–87. DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.11.2.79
15. Greenglass E. R., Fiksenbaum L. Proactive coping, positive affect, and well-being: Testing for mediation using path analysis. European Psychologist, 2009, 14(1): 29–39. DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040.14.1.29
16. Wills T. A. Social support and interpersonal relationships. Review of personality and social psychology. Vol. 12. Prosocial behavior, ed. Clark M. S. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991, 265–289.
17. Greenglass E. The contribution of social support to coping strategies. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 1993, 42(4): 323–340. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1993.tb00748.x
18. Ouwehand C., De Ridder D. T. D., Bensing J. M. Situational aspects are more important in shaping proactive coping behavior than individual characteristics: A vignette study among adults preparing for aging. Psychology & Health, 2006, 21(6): 809–825. DOI: 10.1080/14768320500537639
19. Brissette I., Scheier M. F., Carver C. S. The role of optimism and social network development, coping and psychological adjustment during a life transition. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2002, 82(1): 102–111. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.102
20. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. N. Y.: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1997, 604
21. Voishcheva N. M., Nikiforov G. S., Starchenkova E. S., Slabinsky V. Yu. Individual-psychological features of reactive, active and proactive coping behavior in professional activity of ecologists. Uchenye zapiski universiteta im. P. F. Lesgafta, 2018, (2): 314–319. (In Russ.)
22. Starchenkova E. S. Psychological resource of proactive coping behavior. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriia 12. Psikhologiia. Sotsiologiia. Pedagogika, 2012, (1): 51–61. (In Russ.)
23. Bogdan C., Rioux L., Negovan V. Place attachment, proactive coping and well-being in university environment. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 33: 865–869. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.245
24. Greenglass E., Schwarzer R., Taubert S. The Proactive Coping Inventory (PCI): A multidimensional research instrument. Paper presented at the 20th International Conference of the Stress and Anxiety Research Society (STAR). Cracow, Poland, July 12–14, 1999.
25. Belinskaya E. P., Veсherin A. V., Agadullina E. R. Proactive coping inventory: adaptation to a non-clinical sample and the predictive capability. Klinicheskaia i spetsial'naia psikhologiia, 2018, 7(3): 192–211. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17759/cpse.2018070312
26. Osin E. N. Measuring positive and negative affect: development of a Russian-language analogue of PANAS. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 2012, 9(4): 91–110. (In Russ.)
27. McLain D. L. Evidence of the properties of an ambiguity tolerance measure: The Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance Scale–II (MSTAT–II). Psychological Reports, 2009, 105(3): 975–988. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.105.3.975-988
28. Spurk D., Hirschi A., Wang M., Valero D., Kauffeld S. Latent profile analysis: A review and "how to" guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2020, 120. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
29. Rosenberg J. M., Van Lissa C. J., Beymer P. N., Anderson D. J., Schell M. J., Schmidt J. A. tidyLPA: Easily carry out Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) using open-source or commercial software. Journal of Open Source Software, 2019, 3(30). DOI: 10.21105/joss.00978
30. Crichtlow D. E., Fligner M. A. On distribution-free multiple comparisons in the one-way analysis of variance. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 1991, 20(1): 127–139. DOI: 10.1080/03610929108830487
31. Frydenberg E. Coping research: Historical background, links with emotion, and new research directions on adaptive processes. Australian Journal of Psychology, 2014, 66(2): 82–92. DOI: 10.1111/ajpy.12051
Review
For citations:
Vecherin A.V. Latent Profiles Analysis of Personal Determinants of Overcoming Adversity (Russian and Uzbek Samples). The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2020;22(4):972-981. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-4-972-981
Views:
552
Email this article 