Horses in the Late Tagar Economy: Kosogol I Settlement Materials (Krasnoyarsk Region)
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-4-921-931
Abstract
The archaeological studies developed two concepts concerning the character of Tagar economy: semi-nomadic and sedentary. They are based on different approaches to burial assemblage materials, accidental findings, and general opinion on stock-raising economy in Eurasian forest-steppes and steppes. The zooarchaeological profile of Tagar settlements can resolve this argument. A high share of horse bones may mean a semi-nomadic or nomadic lifestyle, while low share of equine remains can be a sign of a sedentary economy. The research featured Tagar settlements in the forest-steppe areas of the interfluve area between the Kiya and the Chulym. The paper describes the zooarchaeological collection of the archeological site of Kоsоgol I, the largest Early Iron Age settlement in the area. The collection includes 6,634 samples, of which 687 belong to horses. The authors believe that cattle breeding was the main branch of the Tagar economy. Horses were the third most important group. However, horses were not meat animals, as bones of young horses were quite rare among the kitchen waste. The Tagars killed mature or old work horses (older than 12–13), which could not work anymore. Hunting was a secondary branch of their economy: they hunted does, as well as water and moor fowl near the settlement. The results of Kosogol I zooarchaeological assemblage study proved the theory about the sedentary cattle breeding of the early Tagar people.
About the Authors
S. S. Onischenko
Federal Research Center of Coal and Coal Chemistry, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
P. V. German
Federal Research Center of Coal and Coal Chemistry, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
A. S. Savelieva
Federal Research Center of Coal and Coal Chemistry, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
Russian Federation
Kemerovo
References
1. German P. V., Onischenko S. S., Savelieva A. S., Sviatko S. V. Modern source study and methodological problems of Tagar culture cattle breeding research. Martyanov Local History Readings (2018–2019): Proc. Conf., Minusinsk, December 11–12, 2019. Minusinsk: MBUK MKM, 2019, iss. XII, 67–71. (In Russ.)
2. Teploukhov S. А. Metal period. Siberian Soviet encyclopedia. Novosibirsk: Sib. kraev. izd-vo, 1932, vol. III, 400–415. (In Russ.)
3. Kiselev S. V. Decomposition of the clan and feudalism on the Yenisei. Leningrad: Sotsekgiz, GAIMK, 1933, 34. (In Russ.)
4. Grishin Iu. S. Production in the Tagar era. Materials and studies on archeology of the USSR, 1960, (90): 116–206. (In Russ.)
5. Kyzlasov L. R. Essays on the history of Siberia and Central Asia. Krasnoyarsk: Izd-vo Krasnoiar. un-ta, 1992, 224. (In Russ.)
6. Martynov A. I. Forest-steppe Tagar culture. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Sib. otd-nie, 1979, 208. (In Russ.)
7. Chlenova N. L. Tagar culture on the Yenisei. Materials on the ancient history of Siberia (layout of volume I of the History of Siberia), ed. Okladnikov A. P. Ulan-Ude: SO AN SSSR, 1964, 280–308. (In Russ.)
8. Chlenova N. L. Tagar culture. Steppe zone of the Asian part of the USSR in Scythian-Sarmatian time, ed. Moshkova M. G. Moscow: Nauka, 1992, 206–224. (In Russ.)
9. Sosnovskii G. P. Eastern Siberia in the first millennium BC and in the beginning of AD. The history of the USSR from ancient times to the formation of the state. Moscow-Leningrad: Izd-vо AN SSSR, 1939, pt. I-II, 413–423. (In Russ.)
10. Sosnovskii G. P. On the History of Cattle Breeding in Siberia (Materials on the History of the Most Ancient domestic animals). Problems of the origin, evolution and breed formation of domestic animals, ed. Komarov V. L. Moscow-Leningrad: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1940, vol. I, 135–150. (In Russ.)
11. Griaznov М. P. Tagar culture. The history of Siberia from ancient times to the present day. Vol. 1: Ancient Siberia, eds. Okladnikov A. P., Shunkov V. I. Leningrad: Nauka. Leningr. otd-nie, 1968, 187–195. (In Russ.)
12. Pshenitsyna М. N. Tesinsky stage. Steppe zone of the Asian part of the USSR in Scythian-Sarmatian time, ed. Moshkova M. G. Moscow: Nauka, 1992, 224–235. (In Russ.)
13. Bokovenko N. The emergence of the Tagar culture. Antiquity, 2006, 80(310): 860–879. DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00094473
14. Antipina Е. Е. Archaeozoological investigations: tasks, potential possibilities and real issues. The latest archaeological studies in Russia: On the centenary of the birth of V. I. Tsalkin, eds. Antipina E. E., Chernykh E. N. Moscow: Iazyki slavian. kultury, 2003, 8–31. (In Russ.)
15. German P. V., Onischenko S. S., Savelieva A. S. Tagar settlements of the Kiya-Chulym interfluve: research issues and prospects. Uchenye zapiski muzeia zapovednika "Tomskaia pisanitsa", 2018, (8): 16–22. (In Russ.)
16. Sovetova О. S. Petroglyphs of the Tagar era on the Yenisei (plots and images). Novosibirsk: Izd-vo IАET SО RАN, 2005, 140. (In Russ.)
17. Griaznov М. P. First Pazyryk Barrow. Leningrad: Gos. Ermitazh, 1950, 92. (In Russ.)
18. Martynov A. I., Absaliamov M. B. The Tagar settlements. Krasnoyarsk: Izd-vo Krasnoiar. un-ta, 1988, 123. (In Russ.)
19. Krasnienko S. V., Subbotin А. V. Archaeological map of the Uzhursky district of the Krasnoyarsk Territory: natural context and stages of formation. Archaeological sites of Russia: protection and monitoring. Archaeological Monitoring Group of the Institute for the History of Material Culture of the Russian Academy of Sciences (2001–2010), ed. Subbotin A. V. St. Petersburg: Info-Ol, 2012, 52–80. (In Russ.)
20. Krasnienko S. V., Subbotin А. V. At the Solgon Ridge. Archaeological sites of the Uzhursky district (Krasnoyarsk Territory): history of study and current status. St. Petersburg: IIMK RAN, 2013, 192. (In Russ.)
21. Martynov A. I. Kosogolsky archaeological complex. Archeology of South Siberia. Kemerovo: KemGU, 1980, iss. 11, 11–19. (In Russ.)
22. Nashchekin N. V. Kosogolsky treasure. Arkheologicheskie otkrytiia, 1967, 1966: 163–165. (In Russ.)
23. Martynov A. I. Studies of Kosogol settelment. Problems of archaeological cultures of the steppes of Eurasia, ed. Martynov A. I. Kemerovo: KemGU, 1987, 39–51. (In Russ.)
24. Martynov A. I. The work of the detachment of the South Siberian expedition. Arkheologicheskie otkrytiia, 1983, 1981: 213–214. (In Russ.)
25. Catalog of the museum collections "Archeology, Ethnography, and Ecology of Siberia" of Kemerovo State University, comp. Kasastikova L. Yu., eds. Sher Ya. A., Bobrov V. V. Kemerovo: Skif, 2008, iss. 3, 128. (In Russ.)
26. Gromova V. I. Determination of mammals of the USSR by skeleton bones. Iss. 1. Large bones identifier. Moscow-Leningrad: АN SSSR, 1950, 240. (In Russ.)
27. Gromova V. I. Determination of mammals of the USSR by skeleton bones. Iss. 2. The determinant for large bones is tarsus. Moscow-Leningrad: АN SSSR, 1960, 118. (In Russ.)
28. Boessneck J. Osteological differences between sheep (Ovis aries Linné) and goats (Capra hircus Linné). Science in Archaeology: A comprehensive survey of progress and research, eds. Brothwell D. R., Higgs E. S. London: Thames & Hudson, 1970, 331–358.
29. Prummel W., Frisch H.-J. A guide for the distinction of species, sex, and body size of sheep and goat. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1986, 13(6): 567–577.
30. Zeder M. A., Lapham H. A. Assessing the reliability of criteria used to identify postcranial bones in sheep, Ovis, and goats, Capra. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2010, 37(11): 2887–2905. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.06.032
31. Zeder M. A., Pilar S. E. Assessing the reliability of criteria used to identify mandibles- and mandibular dentes in sheep, Ovis, and goats, Capra. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2010, 37(2): 225–242. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.10.002
32. Onischenko S. S., Suslova V. А., Bibik Е. V. Differences features at distal of bones extremites between the roe deer, Capreolus pygargus and Ovis / Capra zooarchaeological group. V mire nauchnykh otkrytii, 2014, (6): 7–22. (In Russ.)
33. Onuk B., Kabak M., Atalar K. Anatomic and craniometric factors in differentiating roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) from sheep (Ovis aries) and coat (Capra hircus) skulls. Archives of Biological Sciences, 2013, 65(1): 133–141. DOI: 10.2298/ABS1301141M
34. Prumell W. Distinguishing features postcranial elements of cattle Bos primigenius f. taurus, and red deer, Cervus elaphus. Schriften aus der Archäologisch-Zoologischen Arbeitsgruppe Schleswing-Kiel. Kiel, 1988, 5–52.
35. Grayson D. K. Quantitative Zooarchaeology. Topics in the Analysis of Archaeological Faunas. Washington: Academic Press, 1984, 202.
36. Cornevin Ch., Lesbre F.-X. Recognition of the age of the teeth and derivatives of the epithelium of a horse, cow, sheep, pig , camel, dog , cat, and poultry. Moscow-Leningrad: Gos. izd-vo s.-kh. i kolkhoz.-koop. lit-ry, 1932, 254. (In Russ.)
37. Silver I. A. The ageing of domestic animals. Science in Archaeology: A Comprehensive Survey of Progress and Research, eds. Brothwell D. R., Higgs E. S. N. Y.: Basic books, 1963, 250–268.
38. Bartosiewicz L., Gál E. Shuffling nags, lame ducks: the archaeology of animal disease. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2013, 264.
39. Anthony D. W., Brown D. R. Looking a gift horse in the mouth: identification of the earliest bitted equids and the microscopic analysis of wear. Early animal domestication and its cultural context. Research Papers in Science and Archaeology, Special Supplement to Volume 6, eds. Crabtree P. J., Campana D., Ryan K. Philadelphia: MASCA, University Museum, 1989, 99–116.
40. Anthony D. W., Brown D. R. The origins of horseback riding. Antiquity, 1991, 65(246): 22–38. DOI: 10.1017/ S0003598X00079278
41. Anthony D. W., Brown D. R. Eneolithic horse exploitation in the Eurasian steppes: Diet, ritual, and riding. Antiquity, 2000, 74(283): 75–86. DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00066163
42. Anthony D. W., Brown D. R. The Secondary Products Revolution, Horse-Riding, and Mounted Warfare. Journal of World Prehistory, 2011, 24(2/3): 131–160. DOI: 10.1007/s10963-011-9051-9
43. Brown D. R., Anthony D. W. Bit wear horseback riding and the Botai site in Kazakstan. Journal of Archaeological Science,1998, 25(4): 331–347.
44. Bendrey R. New methods for the identification of evidence for bitting on horse remains from archaeological sites. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2007, 34(7): 1036–1050. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.09.010
45. Shulga P. I. Herders of Mountain Altai in scythian time (settlement materials). Novosibirsk: NGU, 2015, 336. (In Russ.)
46. Vitt B. O. Horses from the Pazyryk barrows. Sovetskaia arkheologiia, 1952, (XVI): 163–205. (In Russ.)
47. Brauner А. А. Materials for the knowledge of domestic animals in Russia. I. Horse burial mounds of Tiraspol county of Kherson province. Notes of the Agricultural Society of Southern Russia. Odessa, 1916, vol. 86, book 1, 184. (In Russ.)
48. Gromova V. I. The history of horses (Equus) in the Old World. Pt. 2: Evolution and classification of the genus. MoscowLeningrad: Izd-vo i 2-ia tip. Izd-va AN SSSR, 1949, 163. (In Russ.)
49. German P. V. Funeral complexes of the early stage of Tagar culture (systematics and archaeological interpretation). Cand. Hist. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Kemerovo, 2007, 28. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Onischenko S.S., German P.V., Savelieva A.S. Horses in the Late Tagar Economy: Kosogol I Settlement Materials (Krasnoyarsk Region). The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2020;22(4):921-931. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-4-921-931
Views:
637
JATS XML
Email this article 