Brazilian National Identity and the Notion of Brazil
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-3-811-820
Abstract
The Portuguese word "Brazil" is a complex notion for bearers of Brazilian language identity. Not only does it include the name of the country but also a number of generic notions, one of which is primary with respect to the geographical name and others are secondary. The name of the country goes back to the word-combination pau brasil (mahogany). This secular name co-occurred with a sacral one, i.e. Terra de Santa Cruz. The secular variant survived in spite of the negative attitude it evoked in the first decades of its existence. Its further reassessment led to the formation of other notions that form the core of the semantic field "Brazil". The peculiar feature of this field is its early formation (mid XVII century) and early elaboration of various meanings that the word "Brazil" has retained up to now. The complex notion "Brazil", which includes such meanings as "mahogany", "country", "indigenous population", "territories", and "language", is so multifold due to its secular nature: the sacral name of Santa Cruz (Holy Cross) could not have been used in such a way.
References
1. Zagryazkina T. Yu. Ethnodiscours in the space of language and culture. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2016, (2): 52–65. (In Russ.)
2. Zagryazkina T. Yu. France and francophonie: language, society, culture. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 2015, 245. (In Russ.)
3. Joseph J. Language and identity: national, ethnic, religious. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, 268.
4. Huntington S. The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 1993, 72(3): 22–49.
5. Kornienko O. Yu. Cultural and linguistic identity: traditional and modern approaches. Alma Mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly), 2017, (9): 101–105. (In Russ.)
6. Raevskaya M. M. Language ideology as a mental model and research paradigm. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2019, (2): 24–35. (In Russ.)
7. Aroutiounova N. D. Editorial. Logical analysis of the language. Favorites 1988–1995, comp. and ed. Aroutiounova N. D. Moscow: Indrik, 2003, 456–460. (In Russ.)
8. Wierzbicka A. Semantic universals and language descriptions. Moscow: Iaz. rus. kultury, 1999, 780. (In Russ.)
9. Apresyan Yu. D. Selected Works. Vol. II. Integral description of the language and systemic lexicography. Moscow: Shk. "Iaz. rus. kultury", 1995, 766. (In Russ.)
10. Noll V. O português brasileiro: formação e contrastes. São Paulo: Globo, 2008, 399.
11. Noll N., Dietrich W. (orgs.) O Português e o tupi no Brasil. São Paulo: Contexto, 2016, 229.
12. Noll V. Brasil: Herkunft und Entstehung eines Toponyms. Vox Romanica, 1996, 55(1): 188–202.
13. Sousa Mello L. O nome do Brasil. Revista de História, 2001, (145): 61–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9141.v0i145p61-86
14. Leite E. Predadores. Repensando o Brasil nos seus fundamentos morais. Rio de Janeiro: Jaguatirica, 2019, 231.
15. Fausto B. A brief history of Brazil. Moscow: Ves Mir, 2013, 446. (In Russ.)
16. Saprykina O. A. Description of Brazil in the Portuguese written monuments of the XVI century. Russia and Iberoamerica in a globalizing world: history and modernity: Proc. third Intern. forum, St. Petersburg, October 2–4, 2017. St. Petersburg: Skifiia-print, 2017, 2325–2333. (In Russ.)
17. Alvim M. H., Brzozowski S. Saberes no Brasil dos séculos XVI e XVII: Produção e circulação. Brazilian Journal of Development, Curitiba, 2019, 5(8): 13079–13085. DOI: 10.34117/bjdv5n8-123
18. Lehmann M. The depiction of America on Martin Waldseemüller’s world map from 1507 – Humanistic geography in the service of political propaganda. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 2016, 3(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2016.1152785
Review
For citations:
Gurevich D.L. Brazilian National Identity and the Notion of Brazil. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2020;22(3):811-820. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-3-811-820
Views:
535
Email this article 