Precedent Phenomena as Names of Acts
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-3-802-810
Abstract
The article focuses on the cognitive-semiotic nature of precedent phenomena as a marker of intertextuality. The symbolic function of precedent statements, texts, and names allows them to act as indirect naming and represent concepts of acts. An act is always voluntary; it is committed by an actant, receives external evaluation, and leads to a certain result. The precedent phenomena that facilitate interpretation of the acts they describe appeared to have a high cognitive potential in the Russian speech. Different kinds of phenomena represent different acts, precedent statements being the most popular type. They can represent all kind of acts, even in their concise form. Some precedent phenomena name only particular acts, e.g. betrayal, dishonesty, and other negatively evaluated acts, while others can mark a wide range of acts, even those with opposite values, e.g. heroism vs. crime.
About the Author
L. A. Bushuyeva
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod
References
1. Kolesov V. V., Kolesova D. V., Kharitonov A. A. The Dictionary of Russian Mentality. St. Petersburg: Zlatoust, 2014, vol. 2, 592. (In Russ.)
2. Bushuyeva L. A. The act frame: the invariable model and variants of its actualization. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2017, (2): 173–178. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.21603/2078-8975-2017-2-173-178
3. Bushuyeva L. A. The names of acts and values connected with them in Russian and English languages. Vestnik Saratov state technical university, 2006, (2-2): 143–147. (In Russ.)
4. Bakhtin M. M. Toward a philosophy of the act. Philosophy and Sociology of Science and Technology. Yearbook 1984–1985. Moscow: Nauka, 1986, 80–160. (In Russ.)
5. Leontiev D. A. An introduction to the psychology of action. Ekzestentsialnaia traditsiia: filosofiia, psikhologiia, psikhoterapiia, 2009, (2): 153–158. (In Russ.)
6. Golovin S. Yu. Psychologist’s dictionary. Minsk: Kharvest, 1998, 551. (In Russ.)
7. Maksimov A. M. Many-sided essayist. The book for those who want to live a meaningful life. Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf, 2016, 448. (In Russ.)
8. Okolelova O. N. Extralinguistic elements of the concept "act" (the case of Russian and English). Almanakh sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniia, 2010, (2-2): 119–121. (In Russ.)
9. Kubryakova E. S. The word in discourse (new approaches to the analysis). Text and discourse: traditional and cognitivefunctional aspects of the analysis, ed. Manerko L. A. Ryazan: Izd-vo Riaz. gos. ped. un-t im. S. A. Esenina, 2002, 7–11. (In Russ.)
10. Krasnykh V. V. The glossary and grammar of linguaculture: the basics of cultural psycholinguistics. Moscow: Gnozis, 2016, 493. (In Russ.)
11. Zolotarev M. V. To the question of precedence and the secondary conceptualization of the knowledge. Languages and cultures: functional-communicative and lingua-pragmatic aspects, Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., dedicated in memory of Sterligov S. G., Nizhny Novgorod, April 26–27, 2019. Nizhny Novgorod: NNGU im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 2019, 33–34. (In Russ.)
12. Lebedev M. V. Consistency of the meaning. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 1998, 167. (In Russ.)
13. Blokhina E. N. On the linguoculturological approach to the study of precedent texts as phenomena of regional culture. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2015, (11-1): 26–28. (In Russ.)
14. Zakharenko I. V. On the matter of canon and standard in the sphere of precedent phenomena. Language – Mind – communication, eds. Krasnykh V. V., Izotov A. I. Moscow: Filologiia, 1997, iss. 1, 104–113. (In Russ.)
15. Kremneva A. V. The precedent name as a syncretic semiotic sign and its culture-related character. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki, 2019, (4): 46–53. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2019-4-46-53
16. Golubkova E. E. Precedent names as the names of events. Representation of events: integrative approach from the perspective of cognitive studies, ed. Zabotkina V. I. Мoscow: ID IaSK, 2017, 252–279. (In Russ.)
17. Iriskhanova O. K. Focus games in language: semantics, syntax and pragmatics of defocusing. Moscow: Iaz. slavianskoi kultury, 2014, 319. (In Russ.)
18. Zakharenko I. V., Krasnykh V. V., Gudkov D. B., Bagaeva D. V. The precedent name and precedent statement as symbols of precedent phenomena. Language – Mind – communication, eds. Krasnykh V. V., Izotov A. I. Moscow: Filologiia, 1997, iss. 1, 82–103. (In Russ.)
19. Talmy L. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Massachusets; London: The MIT Press, 2000, 504.
20. Popadinets R. V. The precedent name in the conscious of the Russian language speaker: experience in psycholinguistic research. Kursk: Kursk. gos. tekh. Un-t, 2010, 126. (In Russ.)
21. Boldyrev N. N. Problems of verbal communication in cognitive perspective. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki, 2017, (2): 5–14. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2017-2-5-14
22. Slyshkin G. G., Efremova M. A. Film text (linguistic and cultural analysis experience). Moscow: Vodolei Publishers, 2004, 153. (In Russ.)
23. Bushuyeva L. A. The categories of acts and their linguacognitive modeling. Nizhny Novgorod: Izd-vo NNGU im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 2019, 306. (In Russ.)
24. Bushuyeva L. A. Categorization of acts (a case study of the acts of the category "prank"). Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im N. I. Lobachevskogo, 2018, (1): 155–159. (In Russ.)
25. Borbotko V. G. The principles of discourse building: From psycholinguistics toward linguasynergetics, 3rd ed. Moscow: URSS, 2009, 286. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Bushuyeva L.A. Precedent Phenomena as Names of Acts. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2020;22(3):802-810. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-3-802-810
Views:
521
Email this article 