Personal and Communicative Contexts of the Creative Leadership Potential in Students of Humanities and Science
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-2-426-436
Abstract
This research is part of a large-scale project aimed at creating a factor model of creative leadership potential. The present article features the effect of major and gender of students on their creative leadership potential. The authors identified groups of variables that characterize creative leadership potential. The study was based on the holodynamic and trans-communicative paradigm. The following range of scientific methods made it possible to determine the characteristics of creative leadership potential: the method of modeling communicative worlds, the method of psychosemantic graph, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, sociability scale profile, and social network analysis. The study involved 189 students of humanities (101) and science (88). The results showed the specificity of personal creative characteristics and parameters of the communicative world of the participants. Gender proved insignificant for future research. Students that majored in humanities appeared both more original and more conformal. They tended to find unusual negative points in positive topics and problems. Science students worked better with specific information and facts. They were good at evaluating alternatives and planning.
Keywords
creativity,
communication,
communicative world of personality,
trans-professionalism,
trans-communicative approach,
psychosemantics,
stress-trans-formations
Supporting agencies: This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, project No. 0721-2020-0040.
About the Authors
V. I. Kabrin
National Research Tomsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valery I. Kabrin
Tomsk
V. S. Vyskochkov
National Research Tomsk State University; Siberian State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir S. Vyskochkov
Tomsk
I. O. Prudovikov
National Research Tomsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor O. Prudovikov
Tomsk
O. R. Polyakova
National Research Tomsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga R. Polyakova
Tomsk
References
1. Efimov V. S. Future challenges: high school of Russia in postindustrial transition. Vestnik NGUJeU, 2012, (3): 40–57. (In Russ.)
2. Kabrin V. I., Galazhinskiy E. V. Psychological prospects for the potential of creative leadership of a transfessional in university education. New psychological contexts of personality formation in a changing world, eds. Galazhinskiy E. V., Kabrin V. I. Tomsk: Izd. Dom Tom. gos. un-ta, 2017, 11–68. (In Russ.)
3. Jakson M. C. Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers , ed. and tr. Tarasenko F. P. Tomsk: Izd. Dom Tom. gos. un-ta, 2016, 404. (In Russ.)
4. Barnett R. The ecological university: A feasible utopia. London: Routledge, 2017, 214.
5. Kolesnikova I. A. Transdisciplinary strategy of lifelong education research. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek, 2014, (4): 14–36. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2014.2642
6. Alves C. A. Answers from the holistic transdisciplinary paradigm to the contemporary challenges in education: the subject awakening and integration among sciences, tradition, wisdom and experiences. Open Access Library Journal, 2016, 3. DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1102497
7. Tkacheva N. A., Fokina A. B. The professionalism and professional potential of youth. Uspekhi sovremennoj nauki i obrazovaniya, 2016, 2(9): 185–186. (In Russ.)
8. Petriglieri G., Petriglieri J. L. Can business schools humanize leadership? Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2015, 14(4): 625–647. DOI: 10.5465/amle.2014.0201
9. Carmeli A., Gelbard R., Reiter-Palmon R. Leadership, creative problem-solving capacity, and creative performance: The importance of knowledge sharing. Human Resource Management, 2013, 52(1): 95–121. DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21514
10. Ibbotson P., Darsø L. Directing creativity: the art and craft of creative leadership. Journal of Management & Organization, 2008, 14 (5): 548–559. DOI: 10.1017/S1833367200003035
11. Kabrin V. I. The creative leadership: transcultural prospect. Sibirsky psikhologichesky zhurnal, 2015, (58): 121–135. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17223/17267080/58/9
12. Rickards T., Moger S. Creative leadership processes in project team development: an alternative to Tuckman's stage model. British Journal of Management, 2000, 11(4): 273–283. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.00173
13. Sternberg R. J., Kaufman J. C, Pretz J. E. A propulsion model of creative leadership. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2004, 13(3): 145–153. DOI: 10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00304.x
14. Manz C. C., Sims H. P. SuperLeadership: beyond the myth of heroic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 1991, 19(4): 18–35. DOI: 10.1016/0090-2616(91)90051-A
15. Prysor D., Henley A. Boundary spanning in higher education leadership: identifying boundaries and practices in a British university. Studies in Higher Education, 2018, 43(12): 2210–2225.
16. Galazhinskiy E. V., Kabrin V. I. The prospect of the development of a creative personality of a "trans-professional" in the conditions of changes in the scientific and educational paradigm of the university. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2019, (447): 207–214. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17223/15617793/447/25
17. Alizamar A., Afdal A., Ifdil I., Syahputra Y. Exploration of students' creativity based on demography. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 2019, 5(1): 50–65.
18. Maltsev V. P., Shibkova D. Z. Peculiarities of graphic and verbal creativity of students taking into consideration their gender. Vestnik IuUrGU. Seriia "Obrazovanie, zdravookhranenie, fizicheskaia kultura", 2009, (39): 45–47. (In Russ.)
19. Chang H.-Y., Lin H.-C., Wu T.-T., Huang Y.-M. The influence of interactive art of visual music on the creativity of science and engineering students. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Dubai, April 8–11, 2019. Dubai, 2019, 1087–1092. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725233
20. Kapoor H. Sex differences and similarities in negative creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 2019, 142: 238–241. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.043
21. Abraham A., Thybusch K., Pieritz K., Hermann C. Gender differences in creative thinking: behavioral and fMRI findings. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 2014, 8: 39–51. DOI: 10.1007/s11682-013-9241-4
22. Ermakova E. S. Social creativity of students in various areas of vocational training. Vestn. Leningr. gos. unta im. A. S. Pushkina, 2019, (2): 87–100. (In Russ.)
23. Borisova E. V. Comparative analysis of sociability of students of humanitarian and technical profiles at the stage of adaptation at university. Uchenye zapiski: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2019, (2): 217–226. (In Russ.)
24. Kabrin V. I. The communicative world and transcommunicative potential of a person's life: theory, methods, research. Moscow: Smysl, 2005, 247. (In Russ.)
25. Goldstein D. B., Kroeger O. Creative you, tr. Kirova S. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2014, 402. (In Russ.)
26. Computational social network analysis, eds. Abraham A., Hassanien A.-E., Snasel V. London: Springer-Verlag, 2010, 485. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84882-229-0
27. Brabanderу L. D. The forgotten half of change: achieving greater creativity through changes in perception, tr. Maier K., Oreshkina A. Moscow: Pretekst, 2006, 203. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kabrin V.I., Vyskochkov V.S., Prudovikov I.O., Polyakova O.R. Personal and Communicative Contexts of the Creative Leadership Potential in Students of Humanities and Science. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2020;22(2):426-436. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-2-426-436
Views:
527
Email this article 