Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

Legal Concept and Legal Term: Specificity of the Correlation and Definitions (Based on Russian Laws)

https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-1-207-215

Abstract

The present research featured legal concepts and terms in legislative texts. The paper focuses on various approaches to legal concepts and terms, e.g. logical-hierarchical, definitional, structural-semantic, etc. The author proved that the concepts of legal term and legal concept are often synonymous. They have the same nominative function, verbal expression, modification procedure, and variability. In addition, both terms possess legislative definitions. As a result, a legislative text can be understood in broad and narrow sense. The study touched upon the following issues: (a) the institutional functions of legislative definitions (interpretative, differentiating, legal, system-forming); (b) the location of the definition within the legislative text; (c) the main methods for constructing a legislative definition (lists, descriptions, combinations) and defective legislative definitions. The paper describes reasons for the ambiguity of legal concepts (terms) and the variability of their legislative definitions. The research was based on the texts of Russian federal and regional laws, legal dictionaries, and judicial practice. The methods included discursive, categorical, and definitional approaches, as well as induction and deduction and contextual, component, comparative analyzes. The obtained results and conclusions may be used in legislative text studies, as well as by experts in legislative and judicial discourse.

About the Author

M. V. Batyushkina
Legislative Assembly of the Omsk Region
Russian Federation
Omsk


References

1. Brinev K. I. Methodological problems of linguistic expertise: defining the essence of extremism / defining the concept of "social group". Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2012, (2): 117–123. (In Russ.)

2. Vlasenko S. V. Metaphors in legal language. Vestnik TvGU. Seriia: "Filologiia", 2014, (4): 23–30. (In Russ.)

3. Vorobyova M. E. Juridical terminology: system-centric and anthropocentric approaches. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2013, (2-1): 183–186. (In Russ.)

4. Golev N. D. On the interaction of Russian vocabulary and legal terminology in the aspect of their legalization and delegalization. Dinamika iazykovykh i kulturnykh protsessov v sovremennoi Rossii, 2018, (6): 141–146. (In Russ.)

5. Gubaeva T. V. Language and law: The art of word ownership in professional legal activities. Moscow: Norma, 2004, 160. (In Russ.)

6. Reutov V. P. The unity of terminology as a manifestation of the culture of the legal language. Seventh Perm Congress of Lawyers, eds. Golubtsov V. G., Kuznetsova O. A. Moscow: Statut, 2017, 89–98. (In Russ.)

7. Turanin V. Yu. Systematic legal terms as a form of manifestation of the culture of lawmaking. Politics and culture: problems of interaction in the modern world, ed. Osipova N. O. Budapest-Kirov: Raduga-PRESS, 2019, 417–424. (In Russ.)

8. Khizhnyak S. P. Terminological derivational meanings as a result of scientific concepts' categorization (on the example of Russian legal terminology). Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye issledovaniia, 2019, (2): 82–84. (In Russ.)

9. Chirkin V. E. A word about constitutional terminology. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, 2013, (12): 13–19. (In Russ.)

10. Saltykov K. G. Legal concepts and terms: the correlation and interpretation. Vestnik Dalnevostochnogo iuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii, 2017, (4): 5–9. (In Russ.)

11. Bondareva N. A. Applied aspects of terminology modeling (based on the terminological systems of criminal law in Russian and English). Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. St. Petersburg, 2003, 21. (In Russ.)

12. Malyukova E. V. Legal terminology in systemocentric and anthropocentric aspects. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Kemerovo, 2005, 21. (In Russ.)

13. Apt L. F., Dorofeeva T. A. Guidelines for the formation of the conceptual apparatus of the bill. Iuridicheskii vestnik, 2009, (3-4): 64–70. (In Russ.)

14. Golev N. D. Juridical terminology in the context of doctrinal interpretation. Siberian Journal of Philology, 2015, (4): 138–148. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17223 / 18137083/53/15

15. Kosova M. V., Sharipova R. R. Termination as the basis for classification of document texts. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, 2016, 15(4): 245–252. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2016.4.26

16. Kushneruk S. P. Modern texts of documents: sign composition. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, 2013, (3): 90–96. (In Russ.)

17. Palashevskaya I. V. Legal definitions: functional and typological characteristics. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, 2017, 16(3): 131–141. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2017.3.13

18. Maltsev G. V. Social grounds of law. Moscow: Norma, 2007, 800. (In Russ.)

19. Tonkov E. E., Turanin V. Yu. Prospects for improving the legal terminology in the context of the development of modern legislative activity. Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Philosophy. Sociology. Lawseries, 2017, (3): 113–116. (In Russ.)

20. Abramova A. I. Legal concepts in the general cycle of development of the Russian legislation. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, 2017, (11): 34–42. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/article_59f067bf2fb468.89553258

21. Zalevskaya A. A. General and specialized meanings of a term. Vestnik TvGU. Seriia: "Filologiia", 2017, (2): 7–13. (In Russ.)

22. Sandalova N. V. Norm and variativity of legal terms (on lexicographical sources of material). Perm University Herald. Russian and foreign philology, 2010, (2): 42–47. (In Russ.)

23. Presnyakov M. V. Terms of limitation in labor law: about words and definitions. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, 2018, (3): 53–65. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_3_5

24. Kabataeva K. T. Unity legal terminology and systematic approach to legal terminology. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamentalnykh issledovanii, 2013, (8-3): 71–74. (In Russ.)

25. Bulba M. S. Features of the modern Russian legal terminology in terms of pragmatic focus of the text of the legislative act. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2009, (1): 177–184. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Batyushkina M.V. Legal Concept and Legal Term: Specificity of the Correlation and Definitions (Based on Russian Laws). The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2020;22(1):207-215. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-1-207-215

Views: 845


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)