Linguacreative Foundations of the German Comic Book "Dig, Dag, Digedag"
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-4-1139-1149
Abstract
About the Authors
E. A. EngelRussian Federation
38, Volodarskogo St., Tyumen, 625000
M. V. Deneko
Russian Federation
38, Volodarskogo St., Tyumen, 625000
References
1. Barthes R. Rhetoric of the image. Selected works. Semiotics. Poetics, ed. and comp. Kosikova G. K. Moscow: Progress, 1989, 297–319. (In Russ.)
2. Groensteen T. Why are comics still in search of cultural legitimization? A Comics Studies Reader. University Press of Mississippi, 2009, 3–12.
3. McClaud S. Understading comics. Moscow: Beloe Iabloko, 2016, 216. (In Russ.)
4. Anisimova E. E. On the integrity and connectedness of the creolized text (problem statement). Filologicheskie nauki, 1996, (5): 74–85. (In Russ.)
5. Eykalis Yu. A. Modern German-language comic book: verbal and iconic components. Samara: Insoma-press, 2018, 159. (In Russ.)
6. Kozlov E. V. Comics as a phenomenon of linguistic culture: sign – text – myth. Volgograd: Izd-vo Volgogr. gos. un-ta, 2002, 219. (In Russ.)
7. Nefyodova L. A. Cognitive peculiarities of comic strips as creolized texts. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Linguistics, 2010, (1): 4–9. (In Russ.)
8. Stolyarova L. G. Verbal and non-verbal components of communication in the texts of French comics (based on the comics of the "Asterix" series). Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Voronezh, 2012, 23. (In Russ.)
9. Bolshiianova L. M. The external organization of a newspaper text of a multicode nature. Types of communication and the substantial aspect of the language, ed. Shakhnarovich A. M. Moscow: IIa, 1987, 167–172. (In Russ.)
10. Valgina N. S. Text theory. Moscow: Logos, 2003, 173. (In Russ.)
11. Voroshilova M. B. Creolized text: aspects of study. Politicheskaya lingvistika, 2007, (1): 75–80. (In Russ.)
12. Poimanova O. V. Semantic space of video-verbal text. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 1997, 237. (In Russ.)
13. Sorokin Iu. A., Tarasov E. F. Creolized texts and their communicative function. Speech Optimization, ed. Kotov R. G. Moscow: Nauka, 1990, 180–186. (In Russ.)
14. Belova T. M. Comics as means of expressing ethnocultural stereotypes. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2015, (2-3): 132–136. (In Russ.)
15. Dmitrieva D. G. The phenomenon of the American superhero in the context of visual culture of the XX century. Cand. Culturology Sci. Diss. Moscow, 2014, 218. (In Russ.)
16. Dmitrieva D. G. Century of superheroes: origins, history, and ideology of the American comic strip. Moscow: Izoteka, 2015, 317. (In Russ.)
17. Eykalis Yu. A. Comic discourse: specifics of the syntactic design of the characters’ speech. The evolution and transformation of discourses, eds. Dubinin S. I., Shevchenko V. D. Samara: Izd-vo Samarskogo un-ta, 2017, iss. 2, 60–67. (In Russ.)
18. Korovushkin V. P., Falodzhu J. O. Linguocreative potential of Nigerian Pidgin English as an evidence of the present socio-language situation in Nigeria. Uralskii filologicheskii vestnik. Seriia "Iazyk. Sistema. Lichnost: Lingvistika kreativa", 2013, (3): 32–42. (In Russ.)
19. Bazilevich V. B. Language game as form of linguistic creativity manifestation. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2015, (8-3): 20–22. (In Russ.)
20. Galkina A. V. Mastering of linguistic creativity in the context of mastering a foreign language. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki, 2011, (10): 158–164. (In Russ.)
21. Gardner H. E. Creating minds: an anatomy of creativity as seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. N. Y.: Basic Books, 1993, 608.
22. Ward T. B., Saunders K. N. Creativity. Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, ed. Torrance E. P. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, 1974, 3448–3455.
23. Creative Linguistics – 2, ed. Gridina T. A. Ekaterinburg: Uralskii gos. ped. un-t, 2012, 379. (In Russ.)
24. Kupina N. A. Units of a creative text in children's speech. Uralskii filologicheskii vestnik. Seriia "Iazyk. Sistema. Lichnost: Lingvistika kreativa", 2012, (3): 140–144. (In Russ.)
25. Golovanova L. N., Pankratova E. N. Lingvocreativity as an attribute of consciousness transformation. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia, 2015, (3). Available at: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=20288 (accessed 31.07.2019). (In Russ.)
26. Iriskhanova O. K. Linguacreative foundations of the theory of nominalization. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Moscow, 2005, 53. (In Russ.)
27. Mukarzhovskii Ia. Literary language and poetic language. Prague Linguistic Circle, ed. and comp. Kondrashov N. A. Moscow: Progress, 1967, 406–432. (In Russ.)
28. Boldareva E. F. Language game as a form of expression of emotions. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Volgograd, 2002, 21. (In Russ.)
29. Ponomareva G. V. Pun as a form of realization of a language game in English-language Persuasive communication in the aspect of translation. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Krasnodar, 2009, 151. (In Russ.)
30. Karl N. N. The metaphorical aspect of the representation of the quality category in modern German. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 2006, 190. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Engel E.A., Deneko M.V. Linguacreative Foundations of the German Comic Book "Dig, Dag, Digedag". The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2019;21(4):1139-1149. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-4-1139-1149