Syntactic Relations Reflected by Word Order in "The Catcher in the Rye" by J. D. Salinger and "Fates and Furies" by L. Groff

The research features syntactic structure in the twentieth century "The Catcher in the Rye" by J. D. Salinger and the twenty first century "Fates and Furies" by L. Groff. The research objective was to study the nature of syntactic relations expressed by word order in speech of narrators and characters. The paper outlines the rules of word order in the English sentence and reviews related studies in the field of syntax. The author analyzed the syntactic structure of sentences in the speech of narrators and characters in the two novels. The analysis was based on the descriptive method and techniques of observation, interpretation, comparison, and generalization. There were numerous examples of omission of auxiliary verbs in interrogative sentences in characters' speech, as well as interrogative sentences with affirmative structure. In "The Catcher in the Rye", affirmative sentences obecame interrogative with the help of interjections eh and ah. Both novels contained sentences where adverbial modifiers, objects, or attributes preceded the main parts – in the narrators' speech. A lot of one-member and contextually incomplete sentences were used to describe events and personages in both novels. In "The Catcher in the Rye", the narrator's speech revealed few cases of violations of word order rules, mostly in sentences with direct word order. The characters' speech appeared to contain much more cases of word order violations, since the novel features colloquial speech of twentieth century American teenagers. The speech of adult personages was characterized by correct word order. In "Fates and Furies", the narrator's speech demonstrated a significant number of elliptical sentences where auxiliary verb to be was omitted in simple verbal predicate with the verb in Present Continuous, as well as in compound nominal predicate and in passive voice. A comparative study of syntactic structure contributed to a deeper understanding of the nature of syntactic relations reflected by word order in the English sentence, grammatical structure of the English language, and popular types of sentences. In addition, the study showed the way native speakers express their ideas and thoughts by linguistic means and violate linguistic norms. The results can be used in various grammar courses and compiling textbooks.

linguistics, syntax, communicative goal, pragmatics of a sentence, word order, inversion, fiction, narrator' speech, characters' speech

1. Sadykova G. V. Word order: functional aspect: the case of electronic newspaper texts in Russian and English. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Kazan, 2005, 197. (In Russ.)

2. Islamova U. A. A simple sentence in the Avar language in comparison with English. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Makhachkala, 1999, 134. (In Russ.)

3. Khutezhev Z. G. Word order in a simple sentence of the Kabardino-Circassian language. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Nalchik, 1999, 115. (In Russ.)

4. Kormilitsyn S. V. Word order and actual division of the sentence: the case of the Hungarian language. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 2000, 207. (In Russ.)

5. Kokorina E. A. The structure of the simple sentence in Lezgin languages. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 2013, 183. (In Russ.)

6. Mukhina E. N. The history of word order study in a simple sentence in the Erzyan and Finnish languages. Proc. XI Sci. Conf. of Young Scientists of the Department of Philology, Ogarev Mordovian State. Saransk: Izd-vo Mordov. un-ta, 2006, 104–109. (In Russ.)

7. Ponaryadov V. V. Word order in Perm languages in comparative-typological aspect: simple sentence. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Syktyvkar, 2001,179. (In Russ.)

8. Ganieva R. R. Structural-grammatical analysis of phraseological units with the structure of a sentence characterizing disease – health in the English, German, Russian and Tatar languages. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo univerisiteta, 2019, (4): 52–58. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24411/1994-2796-2019-10407

9. Boldyrev N. N., Kobrina N. A., Khudyakov A. A. Theoretical grammar of modern English. Moscow: Vyssh. Shk., 2007, 368. (In Russ.)

10. Langacker R. W. A usage-based model. Topics in cognitive linguistics, ed. Rudzka-Ostyn B. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1988, 78–94.

11. Voyakina E. Yu., Gunina N. A., Koroleva L. Yu. Grammar of the English language. Preparation for final certification. Tambov: Tambov. gos. techn. un-t, EBS ASB, 2015, 96. (In Russ.)

12. Shevyakova V. E. Modern English: word order, actual division, and intonation. Moscow: Nauka, 1980, 380. (In Russ.)

13. Arnold I. V. Stylistics of the modern English language. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1990, 301. (In Russ.)

14. Fedotov O. I. Fundamentals of the theory of literature. Pt. 1: Literary work and literary oeuvre. Moscow: Vlados, 2003, 272. (In Russ.)

15. Popov E. B. English Grammar. Saratov: Vuzovskoe obrazovanie, 2019, 156. (In Russ.)

16. Simkhovich V. A. Practical English Grammar. Minsk: Vysheishaia shkola, 2014, 328. (In Russ.)

17. Khoren R. V., Kryukovskaya I. V., Stambakio E. M. English Grammar Practice. Minsk: RIPO, 2016, 568. (In Russ.)

18. Shamsutdinov F. A. Correlation of structural and communicative functions of word order in modern German and English. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Moscow, 1974, 33. (In Russ.)

19. Nedyalkov I. V. Temporal forms in the Evenki language. Problems of functional grammar. Iss. 6. Predictive Categories in Utterance and Text. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2017, 96–110. (In Russ.)

20. Khabibullin V. A. Word order in modern Chinese, English, and Russian. Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dalnevost. un-ta, 1996, 106. (In Russ.)

21. Golub I. B., Rosental D. E. A book about good speech. Moscow: Kultura i sport; Iuniti, 1997, 268. (In Russ.)

22. Krasnopiorova Yu. V. Theoretical grammar of the English language. Saratov: Ai Pi Ar Media, 2019, 75. (In Russ.)

23. Dmitrieva I. V., Petrashkevich N. Р. Theory of English grammar. Minsk: RIPO, 2017, 224. (In Russ.)

24. Ivshin V. D. The speech syntax of modern English: (semantic division of sentences). Rostov-on-Don: Feniks, 2002, 317. (In Russ.)

25. Shevyakova V. E., Pavlokova M. A. Inversion in English. Moscow: Nauka, 2001, 68. (In Russ.)