Team Approach to Diagnostic and Correction of Learning Problems in a Public Primary School
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-4-998-1004
Abstract
The paper presents an analysis of opportunities of a team approach in support of primary school pupils with learning difficulties and maladjustment. It describes the possibilities of neuropsychological approach in conjunction with the team method of work. The authors introduced stages of the diagnostic and remedial process, taking into account the specific features of public primary school. The research objective was to analyze opportunities of team method in a primary school, based on the neuropsychological approach. The diagnostic and remedial process has four stages. For the diagnosis, the authors used age-adapted individual and group neuropsychological assessment of children using Luria's battery, with quantitative evaluation of data, as well as a modified method of "proof-reading test" and Gestalt test by Bender. The authors proposed a multi-stage diagnostic method, adapted to conditions of the public primary school. The results of diagnosis revealed the structure of cognitive disturbances in children. The paper focuses on the application possibilities of the team method, based on the neuropsychological approach in primary school, as well as on the opportunities for schools to support children "at risk".
Keywords
children with learning difficulties,
difficulties in behavior,
remediation at school,
diagnostic method,
neuropsychologist at school,
disadaptation
Supporting agencies: This work was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant No. 18-013-00721.
About the Authors
A. V. Plotnikova
Lyceum No. 109
Russian Federation
37B, Volgogradskaya St., Ekaterinburg, 620146
Russian Federation
37B, Volgogradskaya St., Ekaterinburg, 620146
J. M. Glozman
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
Russian Federation
1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
References
1. Glozman J. M. Pediatric neuropsychology, 2nd ed. Moscow: Iurait, 2017, 268. (In Russ.)
2. Mikadze Y. V. Pediatric Neuropsychology. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2008, 288. (In Russ.)
3. Yanitskiy M. S., Seryy A. V., Ivanov M. S., Utyuganov A. A., Khakimova N. R. Post-non-classical pedagogical psychology: valuesemantic trend. Kemerovo: KRIRPO, 2017, 202. (In Russ.)
4. Children with learning problems, eds. Sapir S. G., Nitzberg A. C. N. Y.: Behavioral Publications, 1973, 150.
5. Akhutina T. V. Neuropsychology of individual differences of children as the basis for the use of neuropsychological methods in school. I Intern. Conf. in memory of A. R. Luria, eds. Khomskaia E. D., Akhutina T. V. Moscow: Izd-vo RPO, 1998, 201–208. (In Russ.)
6. Vygotsky L. S. Collected works. Vol. 4: Child psychology. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1984, 376–385. (In Russ.)
7. Practical neuropsychology. Experience with children with learning difficulties, ed. Glozman J. M. Moscow: Genezis, 2016, 336. (In Russ.)
8. Mikadze Y. V. Neuropsychological analysis of the formation of mental functions in children. I Intern. Conf. in memory of A. R. Luria, eds. Khomskaia E. D., Akhutina T. V. Moscow: Izd-vo RPO, 1998, 225–231. (In Russ.)
9. Markovskaia I. F. Impaired mental function. Clinical and neuropsychological diagnosis. Moscow: Kompens-tsentr, 1993, 198. (In Russ.)
10. Akhutina T. V., Pylaeva N. M. Methodology of neuropsychological support for children with uneven development of mental functions. A. R. Luria and Psychology of the XXI Century: Proc. II Intern. Conf., dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the birth of A. R. Luria, ed. Akhutina T. V., Glozman J. M. Moscow: Smysl, 2003, 181–189. (In Russ.)
11. Simernickaia E. G. The human brain and mental processes in ontogenesis. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, 1985, 190. (In Russ.)
12. Hynd G. W., Obrzut J. E. School neuropsychology. Journal of school psychology, 1981, 19(1): 45–50.
13. Brain development and cognition: a reader, 2nd ed., eds. Johnson M. H., Munakata Y., Gilmore R. O. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993, 560.
14. Davidson M. C., Amso D., Anderson L. С., Diamond A. Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 2006, 44(11): 2037–2078. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.006
15. Gaddes W. H. An examination of the validity of neuropsychological knowledge in educational diagnosis and remediation. Neuropsychological assessment and the school-aged child: issues and procedures, eds. Hynd G. W., Obrzut J. E. N. Y.: Grune&Stratton, 1981, 27–85.
16. Gerstadt C. L., Hong Y. J., Diamond A. The relationship between cognition and action: performance of children 3 1/2-7 years old on a Stroop-like day-night test. Cognition, 1994, 53(2): 129–153.
17. Mikadze Y. V., Korsakova N. K. Neuropsychological diagnosis and correction of schoolchildren. Moscow: IntelTekh, 1994, 231. (In Russ.)
18. Hongwanishkul D., Happaney K. R., Lee W. S. C., Zelazo Р. D. Assessment of hot and cool executive function in young children: age-related changes and individual differences. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2005, 28(2): 617–644.
19. Lebedinskii V. V. Normal and pathological developmental problems. I Intern. Conf. in memory of A. R. Luria, eds. Khomskaia E. D., Akhutina T. V. Moscow: Izd-vo RPO, 1998, 193–201. (In Russ.)
20. Glozman J. M., Soboleva A. E. Neuropsychological diagnosis of school children, 2nd ed. Moscow: Smysl, 2018, 175. (In Russ.)
21. Neuropsychological diagnosis, examination of writing and reading of primary school students, eds. Akhutina T. V., Ishankova O. V. Moscow: V. Sekachev, 2008, 128. (In Russ.)
22. Menchinskaia N. A., Moro M. I. Questions of the methodology and psychology of teaching arithmetic in elementary grades. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1965, 224. (In Russ.)
23. Glozman J. M. Neuropsychological examination: a qualitative and quantitative assessment of data. Moscow: Smysl, 2012, 264. (In Russ.)
24. Lovi O. V., Belopolsky V. I. Bender Hand-held Gestalt Test. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr, 2003, 42. (In Russ.)
25. Korsakova N. K., Mikadze Y. V., Balashova E. Yu. Unsuccessful children: neuropsychological diagnosis of learning difficulties. Moscow: Pedagogicheskoe obshchestvo Rossii, 2001, 238. (In Russ.)
26. Shimamura A. Р., Pechenkova E. V. Frontal lobes and regulation of cognitive activity. A. R. Luria and psychology of the XXI century: Proc. II Intern. Conf., dedicated to the 100th anniversary of A. R. Luria, eds. Akhutina T. V., Glozman J. M. Moscow: Smysl, 2003, 80–90. (In Russ.)
27. Filippello Р., Buzzai C., Costa S., Sorrenti L. School refusal and absenteeism: perception of teacher behaviors, psychological basic needs, and academic achievement. Front. Psychol., 2019, 10: 57–62. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01471
28. Bailey R., Meland E. A., Brion-Meisels G., Jones S. M. Getting developmental science back into schools: can what we know about self-regulation help change how we think about "no excuses"? Front. Psychol., 2019, 10: 78–97. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01885
29. Krispenz A., Gort C., Schültke L., Dickhäuser O. How to reduce test anxiety and academic procrastination through inquiry of cognitive appraisals: a pilot study investigating the role of academic self-efficacy. Front. Psychol., 2019, 10: 37–42. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01917
Review
For citations:
Plotnikova A.V., Glozman J.M. Team Approach to Diagnostic and Correction of Learning Problems in a Public Primary School. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2019;21(4):998-1004. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-4-998-1004
Views:
532
Email this article 