THE PROBLEM OF ACCURACY OF INTERPERSONAL PERCEPTION: CONTEMPORARY CONCEPTUAL MODELS AND EMPIRICAL RESEARCH
Abstract
The paper discusses the background and development of modern concepts of interpersonal perception that influenced the practice of empirical studies of the accuracy of interpersonal perception. From this perspective, the paper analyzes the content of such approaches as the social relations model (D. Kenny), the social accuracy model (J. Biesanz), the theory of pragmatic accuracy (W. Swann), calibration hypothesis (E. Tenney) and the theory of realistic accuracy (D. Funder). It is noted that the general principle underlying the data concepts was the increased attention to contextual characteristics of different levels of generality of the process of interpersonal perception, which have a significant impact on its accuracy. In conclusion, the authors state that, despite the accumulated mass of empirical data, the problem of accuracy of interpersonal perception is far from being resolved, and outline the possible future lines of its theoretical and empirical analysis.
About the Authors
E. P. BelinskayaRussian Federation
Elena P. Belinskaya – Doctor of Psychology, Professor at the Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology
I. D. Bronin
Russian Federation
Igor D. Bronin – post-graduate student at Psychological Institute
References
1. Андреева Г. М. Психология социального познания. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2000. 288 с.
2. Бэрон Р. Социальная психология: ключевые идеи. 4-е изд. СПб.: Питер, 2003. 512 с.
3. Back M. D., Kenny D. A. The Social Relations Model: How to Understand Dyadic Processes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2010. Vol. 10. Issue 4. P. 855 – 870.
4. Barrett L. F., Pietromonaco P. R. Accuracy of the Five-Factor Model in Predicting Perceptions of Daily Social Interactions. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin. 1997. Vol. 23. Issue 11. P. 1173 – 1187.
5. Berry D. S. Accuracy in Social Perception: Contributions of Facial and Vocal Information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991. Vol. 61. P. 298 – 307.
6. Biesanz J. C. The Social Accuracy Model of Interpersonal Perception: Assessing Individual Differences in Perceptive and Expressive Accuracy. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2010. Vol. 45. Issue 5. P. 853 – 885
7. Biesanz J. C., Human L. J., Paquin A.-C., Chan M., Parisotto K. L., Saraccino J., Gillis R. L., Do We Know When Our Impressions of Others Are Valid? Evidence for Realistic Accuracy Awareness in First Impressions of Personality. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2011. Vol. 2. Issue 5. P. 452 – 459.
8. Borkenau P., Liebler A. Trait Inferences: Sources of Validity at Zero Acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992. Vol. 62. No. 4. P. 645 – 657.
9. Funder D. C. On the Accuracy of Personality Judgment: A Realistic Approach. Psychological Review. 1995. 102. P. 652 – 671.
10. Funder D. A. Accurate Personality Judgment. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2012. Vol. 21. P 172 – 182.
11. Gosling S. D., Ko S. J., Mannarelli T., Morris M. E. A Room with a Cue: Personality Judgments Based on Offices and Bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002. Vol. 82. Issue 3. P. 379 – 398.
12. Gosling S. D., Vazire S. E-Perceptions: Personality Impressions Based on Personal Websites. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004. Vol. 87. Issue 1. P. 123 – 132.
13. Human L. J., Sandstorm G. M., Biesanz J. C., Dunn E. W. Accurate First Impressions Leave a Lasting Impression: The Long-Term Effects of Distinctive Self-Other Agreement on Relationship Development. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2012. Vol. 4. Issue 4. P. 395 – 402.
14. Maureen O., Ekman P., Wallace F., Scherer K. What You Say and How You Say It: The Contribution of Speech Content and Voice Quality to Judgments of Others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985. Vol. 48. P. 54 – 62.
15. Snijders T. A. B., Kenny D. A. The Social Relations Model for Family Data: A Multilevel Approach. Personal Relationships. 1999. Vol. 6. P. 471 – 486.
16. Swann W. B. Quest for Accuracy in Person Perception – A Matter of Pragmatism. Psychological Review. 1984. Vol. 91. Issue 4. P. 457 – 477.
17. Swann W. B. The Self and Identity Negotiation. Interaction Studies. 2005. Vol. 6. Issue 1. P. 69 – 83.
18. Tenney E. R., Spellman B. A. Complex Social Consequences of Self-Knowledge. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2011. Vol. 2. Issue 4. P. 343 – 350.
19. West T. V., Kenny D. A. Truth and Bias Model of Judgment. Psychological Review. 2011. Vol. 118. Issue 2. P. 357 – 378.
20. David A. Kenny’s Homepage. Режим доступа: www.davidakenny.net
Review
For citations:
Belinskaya E.P., Bronin I.D. THE PROBLEM OF ACCURACY OF INTERPERSONAL PERCEPTION: CONTEMPORARY CONCEPTUAL MODELS AND EMPIRICAL RESEARCH. SibScript. 2015;(1-1):109-113. (In Russ.)