"That" and "This" vs "Tot" and "Etot"
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-3-850-859
Abstract
The abstracted article summarizes the author's observations concerning the use of the English demonstrative pronouns this and that. The author focuses on the contradiction between what is prescribed by the language system, and what is accepted by the language community. The contradiction mentioned reveals itself in the tendency of the pronoun that to accept the functions of its counterparts by the oppositions of this – that and it – this / that. The speculations of the author are grounded by the theory of oppositional reduction, the fundamentals of which are shortly described after a brief review of literature devoted to the study of demonstrative pronouns. Next, the author passes to the description of the research procedure, which includes statistical, experimental and analytical components. The author's tools also involve elements of comparative analysis of English and Russian demonstrative pronouns, which was ultimately necessary for the implementation of the didactic task. The author's reasoning is accompanied by text illustrations, from which it follows that the main condition contributing to the reduction of the opposition by proximity is anaphoric reference, which is most often accompanied by the stressed position of the pronoun. In conclusion, the author notes the tendency of the pronoun that to secure the status of a universal demonstrative, capable of representing both this and it. This circumstance constitutes one of the specific features of the English demonstrative pronouns in relation to Russian ones, which, in turn, creates additional problems for Russian learners of English.
About the Author
A. V. Terenin
Elabuga Institute of Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Russian Federation
89, Kazanskaya St., Elabuga, 423600
Russian Federation
89, Kazanskaya St., Elabuga, 423600
References
1. Fomenko L. N. English demonstrative pronouns as one of the linguistic deictic resources. Vestnik IMSIT, 2014, (3-4): 69–71. (In Russ.)
2. Samokhvalova E. V. The demonstrative pronoun this as a means of identifying reference. Vestnik Severo-Osetinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. K. L. Khetagurova. Obshchestvennye nauki, 2012, (2): 351–356. (In Russ.)
3. Paducheva E. V. Demonstrative pronouns. Russian corpus grammar. 2016. Available at: http://rusgram.ru/Ukazatel’nye_mestoimeniia#221 (accessed 12.01.2019). (In Russ.)
4. Paducheva E. V., Stoynova N. M. Demonstrative pronouns ‘tot’ (that) and ‘etot’ (this) as components of tense markers. Izvestiia RAN. Seriia literatury i iazyka, 2017, 76(4): 5–17. (In Russ.)
5. Allamurodova S. D. The connection between the words by means of demonstrative pronouns. Vestnik instituta iazykov, 2013, 4(4): 11–17. (In Russ.)
6. Razdina T. I. Functioning of the demonstrative pronouns as means of cohesion in texts of oral and written communication in the English language. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, 2011, (633): 158–168. (In Russ.)
7. Kulikov L. I. Replaceability of anaphoric pronouns ETOT and TAKOI. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 9. Filologiia, 1985, (1): 72–74. (In Russ.)
8. Fedorova M. A. Pronouns and the ambiguity of pronoun reference. Nauchnye trudy KubGTU, 2016, (1): 10–17. (In Russ.)
9. Gundel J. K., Hedberg N., Zacharski R. Demonstrative Pronouns in Natural Discourse. Proceedings of the Fifth Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution Colloquium, 2004, 81–86.
10. Rahimova D. I., Yusupova Z. F. Semantics and pragmatics of demonstrative pronouns in Russian and Turkic languages. Journal of language and literature, 2015, (6-2): 113–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7813/jll.2015/6-2/22
11. Rustipa K. The Use of Demonstrative Pronoun and Demonstrative Determiner this in Upper-Level Student Writing: A Case Study. English Language Teaching, 2015, (8-5): 158–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n5p158
12. Vaysi E., Salehnejad L. Spatial and Temporal Deixis in English and Persian. International journal of humanities and cultural studies, 2016, (6-2): 1405–1414.
13. Rabadi R. Demonstrative Pronouns in English and Arabic: Are they Different or Similar? English Language and Literature Studies, 2016, (6-1): 16–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v6n1p16
14. Coventry K., Griffiths D., Hamilton C. Spatial demonstratives and perceptual space: Describing and remembering object location. Cognitive Psychology, 2014, (69): 46–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.12.001
15. Tymchuk E. V., Fedorova M. A. Factors influencing the referential choice of demonstrative pronouns in the English language. Nauchnye trudy KubGTU, 2015, (3): 97–109. (In Russ.)
16. Biber D., Johansson S., Leech G., Conrad S., Finegan E. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Edinbourgh Gate: Pearson Education Limited, 2000, 1204.
17. Diessel H. Demonstratives. Form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins publishing company, 1999, 218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.015
18. Blokh M. Ia. Theoretical outline of English grammar. Moscow: Vyssh. shk., 2002, 160. (In Russ.)
19. Trubetskoi N. S. Fundamental of phonology. Moscow: Aspekt-Press, 2000, 352. (In Russ.)
20. Moskalskaja O. Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Moscow: Akademiia, 2004, 352.
21. Schendels E. Deutsche Grammatik. Moscow: Vyssh. shk., 1979, 397.
22. Bondarko A. V. Aspect and tense of the Russian verb (meaning and usage). Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1971, 239. (In Russ.)
23. Khlebnikova I. B. Oppositions in morphology. Moscow: MOPI im. N. K. Krupskoi, 1969, 132. (In Russ.)
24. Petina S. S. The oppositional substitution in morphology as the research object in communicative paradigmatic linguistics. Izvestiia Iuzhnogo federal’nogo universiteta, 2014, (1): 80–86. (In Russ.)
25. Morozova E. N. Oppositional substitution by the category of tense (present – future). Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N. A. Nekrasova, 2008, (1): 188–193. (In Russ.)
26. Terenin A. V. Neutralization of voice relations in the English language. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2018, (7-1): 177–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018-7-1.39 (In Russ.)
27. Levinson S. C. Deixis and Demonstratives. Manual for the 1999 Field Season, ed. D. Wilkins. Nijmegen. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 1999, 29–40. DOI. https://doi.org/10.17617/2.2573810
28. Gudde H. B., Coventry K., Engelhardt P. E. Language and memory for object location. Cognition, 2016, (153): 99–107. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.016
29. Skrebnev Iu. M. Theoretical outline of stylistics. Gorkii, 1975, 175. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Terenin A.V. "That" and "This" vs "Tot" and "Etot". The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2019;21(3):850-859. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-3-850-859
Views:
636
Email this article 