Motivating Signs of the Concepts “Zvezda” and “Star” in Comparative Aspect
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-2-478-487
Abstract
The article deals with the contrastive study of the linguacultural concepts “zvezda” in Russian and “star” in English. Modern typological, comparative, and contrastive studies are aimed at defining common and distinctive characteristics of linguistic development of reality by human in related and non-closely related languages. Linguits search for parallels and differences in the course of cognitive-discursive reconstruction of linguocultural concepts. The article introduces a complex methodology of researching the language verbalization of conceptual characteristics. The algorithm of systematic study is demonstrated on the analysis of the concept “zvezda” in Russian and “star” in English. The research takes into account the following factors: 1) motivating features based on etymological dictionaries; 2) actualizing the revealed features in contexts; 3) defining the syncretic meanings. The author analyzed the etymological dictionaries of the languages and revealed 10 motivating signs for “zvezda” and 12 of motivating signs for “star”, some of which overlap. The presence of common motivating signs in the structures of the concepts suggests that the stars were interpreted by carriers of Russian and English linguacultures in a similar way. The signs “nebesnyi / heavenly” – located on the sky, “telo / body” – the mythopoetic perception of stars as the eyes of gods; “siianie / sparkling” – ability to emit light. It indicates a relationship of adequate congruency of the motivating signs. The following motivating signs showed some difference. Russian sign include “svetilo” (light-emitting body), “blesk” (brilliance), “mertsanie” (shimmer), “nepodvizhnost” (immobility), “kometa” (comet), “otmetina (na lbu zhivotnogo loshadi / korovy)” (a mark on the forehead of a horse / cow) and “serebro” (silver); in English – “not including the sun and moon”, “strewer or spreader, or disperser of light”, “sprinkling”, “constellate”, “born under unlucky star”, “disaster”, “disastrous”. This testifies to the different perception of the given concepts by the linguacultures under consideration. These data reflect the mechanism of concept formation and can serve as a basis for further development.
About the Author
Aigul A. Bakirova
Institute of Foreign Languages
Russian Federation
13, Line 12 V.O., St. Petersburg, Russia, 191178
Russian Federation
13, Line 12 V.O., St. Petersburg, Russia, 191178
References
1. Coates J. Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. 3rd ed. Routledge, 2004. 245 p.
2. Geertz C. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. N. Y.: Basiс Books Inc., 1973, 470.
3. Hymes D. The Ethnography of Speaking. Language, Culture and Society, ed. by Blount B. G. Prospect Heights (III), 1995, 248–282.
4. Lakoff G. The contemporary theory of metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 89.
5. Lakoff G., Kovecses Z. The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. Cultural Models in language and thought, eds. Quinn D., Holland N. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, 195–221.
6. Langacker R. W. Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin, N. Y., 1991, 250.
7. Wierzbicka A. Lexicography and conceptual analysis. Ann Arbor: Karoma, 1985, 270.
8. Wierzbicka A. Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 1992, 496.
9. Apresyan Yu. D. Selected works. Vol. II: Integral language description and systemic lexicography. Moscow: Shkola “Iazyki russkoi kultury”, 1995, 767. (In Russ.)
10. Krongauz M. A. Semantics. Moscow: Academia, 2005, 352. (In Russ.)
11. Stepanov Yu. S. Constants: dictionary of Russian culture, 3rd ed. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, 2004, 991. (In Russ.)
12. Pimenova M. V. On the question of the methodology of conceptual studies (on the example of the concept star). Problems of conceptualizing reality and modeling the linguistic picture of the world, ed. Simashko T. V. Moscow-Arhangel'sk, 2009, 140–153. (In Russ.)
13. Bakirova A. A. Methods of the motiving signs verbalizing of the concept “zvezda” in the Russian language picture of the world. Conceptual Studies in the aspect of Russian lingvoculture, ed. Pimenova M. V. Saint-Petersburg, 2018, 108–114. (In Russ.)
14. Bakirova A. A. Conceptual signs that have appeared in the concept star in the history of the development of the Russian language. Studies of language and speech, ed. Pimenova M. V. Saint-Petersburg: SPbGEU, 2018, 8–19. (In Russ.)
15. Pimenova M. V., Bakirova A. A. Figurative signs of concept “zvezda”. Language and text, ed. Pimenova M. V. Saint-Petersburg, 2015, 49–55. (In Russ.)
16. Pimenova M. V. Concept “serdtse”: image, meaning , symbol. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2007, 500.
17. Kolesov V. V., Pimenova M. V. Introduction to conceptology. Moscow: Flinta, 2016, 248. (In Russ.)
18. Pimenova M. V. Fixed metaphor “soul-star” and its variation “soul-sun”. Informational bulletin of specialists of Russian phylology in Ukraine. Simferopol': Krymskii Archiv, 2013, iss. 16, 37–44. (In Russ.)
19. Pimenova M. V., Chelbakova Iu. V. Naive view of native speakers (peculiarities of conceptualizing star). Innovations in cognitive linguistics, ed. Pimenova M. V. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2006, 574–579. (In Russ.)
20. Pimenova M. V. “Soul would like to be a star...”. Ethnohermeneutik und Antropologie, eds. Pimenov E. A., Pimenova M. V. Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik, 2004, 38–43. (In Russ.)
21. Pirogova M. N. The concept star in invocation poetry (on the material of Vyatka magic word formulas). Vestnik Viatskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, 2009, (4-2): 139–142. (In Russ.)
22. Lanskaya O. V. Concept “star” as a reflection of space in the poetry of Yu. P. Kuznecov. East Slavic languages in historical and cultural context: cognitive linguistics and concept studies, ed. Pimenova M. V. Kiev: Izd. dom D. Burago, 2012, 124–128. (In Russ.)
23. Barkan S. E. The signs of nature in the structure of the concept “star”. Language and Culture, 2009, (3): 5–9. (In Russ.)
24. Repiuk E. V. Mythological features of “star”. Person. Tongue. Culture. Kiev: Izd. dom D. Burago, 2013, part 1, 385–391. (In Russ.)
25. Repiuk E. V. Image signs of substance of concepts “zvezda” and “star” in Russian and English conceptual systems. Contemporary methods in research of mentality. Saint-Petersburg: SPbGU, 2011, 272–278. (In Russ.)
26. Rol'gayzer A. A. Somatic features of concepts “zvezda” and “étoile”. New in XXI century linguistics. Kiev: Izd. dom D. Burago, 2013, 304–308. (In Russ.)
27. Rol'gayzer A. A. Analysis of the zoomorphic culture code: the case of “star” and “étoile” concepts (on the material of Russian and French). East Slavic languages in historical and cultural context: cognitive linguistics and concept studies, ed. Pimenova M. V. Kiev: Izd. dom D. Burago, 2012, 153–159. (In Russ.)
28. Rol'gayzer A. A. Anthropomorphous characteristics of concepts “star” and “étoile”. Siberian Journal of Phylology, 2013, (2): 236–241. (In Russ.)
29. Rol'gayzer A. A. Vegetative code as a way of describing “zvezda” and “étoile” concepts. Person. Tongue. Culture. Kiev: Izd. dom D. Burago, 2013, part 1, 391–397. (In Russ.)
30. Rol'gayzer A. A. Vital features of “zvezda” and “étoile” concepts. Cognitive linguistics: new paradigms and new solutions. Moscow: IIA RAN, 2011, 435–441. (In Russ.)
31. Rol'gayzer A. A. Food metaphor as a way of image features realization of concept “zvezda”. Russian language in CIS, ed. Shalgimbekova K. S. Kostanai: Kostanaiskii filial ChelGU, 2014, 112–116. (In Russ.)
32. Rol'gayzer A. A. Object features realization of “zvezda” and “étoile” concepts. Contemporary methods in research of mentality, ed. Pimenova M. V. Saint-Petersburg: SPbGU, 2011, 279–284. (In Russ.)
33. Rol'gayzer A. A. Symbolic interpretation of the “star” and “étoile” concepts. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2013, (3-1): 192–195. (In Russ.)
34. Rol'gayzer A. A. Somatic signs concepts star and étoile. New in XXI century linguistics. Kiev: Izd. dom D. Burago, 2013, 304–308. (In Russ.)
35. Pimenova M. V. Concept hope in the Russian picture of the world. Human and his language: to the 75th anniversary of V. P. Nedyalkov. Kemerovo, 2003, 47–67. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Bakirova A.A. Motivating Signs of the Concepts “Zvezda” and “Star” in Comparative Aspect. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2019;21(2):478-487. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-2-478-487
Views:
713
Email this article 