Psychical Process in Social Perception
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-2-403-413
Abstract
The research features the theoretical construct of the psychical process in social perception in line with the integrative approach to human psychology and social interaction. The author believes that psychical processes can be described as an integrative phenomenon of social perception. The psychical process is a multi-level system of mental activity, determined by mutual awareness of people in the process of joint activity and communication. There are three levels of the psychical process in social perception: gnoseological, semiotic, and phenomenological. The gnoseological level is described through the categories "reflection", "representation", "expression", and "experience"; semiotic level is presented by the categories "sign", "value", "meaning", and "relation"; the phenomenological level is indicated by the categories "identification", "apperception", "interpretation", and "portrait". The methodological value of the construct of psychical process realizes the principle of integrity in the learning of human psychology. The author outlines some prospects for future studies of ways and methods of the human psychological qualities and their refraction in the human individual psychology in the course of social interaction. The paper illustrates the prospective use of the construct in interpersonal perception studies.
About the Authors
Vladimir N. Panferov
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation
48, Moika Embankment, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 191186
Russian Federation
48, Moika Embankment, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 191186
Anastasia V. Miklyaeva
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation
48, Moika Embankment, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 191186
Russian Federation
48, Moika Embankment, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 191186
Svetlana A. Bezgodova
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Russian Federation
48, Moika Embankment, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 191186
Russian Federation
48, Moika Embankment, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 191186
References
1. Andreeva G. M. Psychology of social cognition. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2000, 288. (In Russ.)
2. Bodalev A. A. The perception and understanding of man by man. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, 1982, 199. (In Russ.)
3. Labunskaya V. A. Communication and cognition people of one another in the works of A. A. Bodalev: modern view on fundamental problems (round table discussion). Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2015, 12(1): 6–11 (In Russ.)
4. Yanchuk V. A. Introduction to modern social psychology. Minsk: ASAR, 2005, 800. (In Russ.)
5. Panferov V. N. Integral synthesis of human psychology in science, in education, in social interaction. Saint-Petersburg: Izd-vo RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena, 2015, 761. (In Russ.)
6. Panferov V. N. Methodology of the integrated synthesis of human psychological knowledge (dedicated to the 110th anniversary of the birth of B. G. Ananiev). Integrative approach to the knowledge of human psychology. Saint-Petersburg: Izd-vo RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena, 2017, 11–30. (In Russ.)
7. Belinskaya E. P., Bronin I. D. The problem of accuracy of interpersonal perception: contemporary conceptual models and empirical research. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2017, (1-1): 109–113. (In Russ.)
8. Shepherd J. The face and social attribution. Handbook of research on face processing, eds. Young A., Ellis H. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1989, 289–320.
9. Wang Z., Mao H., Li Y. J., Liu F. Smile Big or Not? Effects of Smile Intensity on Perceptions of Warmth and Competence. Journal of Consumer Research, 2017, 43(5): 787–805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw062
10. Khrisanfova L.A. Perception of individual psychological characteristics of a person according to the structural features of his face. Eksperimental'naya psihologiya, 2009, 2(4): 51–73. (In Russ.)
11. Barabanshchikov V. A., Khrisanfova L. A. Confidence in a person during the initial perception of his face. Methods of studying psychological structures and their dynamics, eds. Savchenko T. N., Golovina G. M. Moscow: IP RAN, 2007, iss. 4, 117–127. (In Russ.)
12. Karitsky I. N., Finkelstein V. N. Social perception of clothes. System genesis of educational and professional activities: Proc. VII Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf. Yaroslavl: Izd-vo Yaroslavskogo gos. ped. un-ta im. K. D. Ushinskogo, 2015, 170–172. (In Russ.)
13. Labunskaya V. A., Drozdova I. I. A theoretical and empirical analysis of the influence of socio-psychological factors on young people''s assessment and self-assessment of appearance. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2017, 14(2): 202–226. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.21702/rpj.2017.2.12
14. Labunskaya V. A. Non-verbal behavior (social perceptual approach). Rostov-on-Don: Izd-vo Rostov. un-ta, 1986, 5–35. (In Russ.)
15. Kunitsyna V. N., Kazarinova N. V., Pogol'sha V. M. Interpersonal communication. Saint-Petersburg: Piter, 2001, 544. (In Russ.)
16. Mikheeva E. N. Socio-psychological interpretation of the student's personality in appearance and non-verbal behavior in a lesson situation. Diss. Cand. Psychol. Sci. Abstr. Saint-Petersburg, 1993, 17. (In Russ.)
17. Vasilyuk F. E. Psychology of experience (analysis of overcoming critical situations). Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1984, 200 (In Russ.)
18. Vygotsky L. S. Collected Works. Vol. 6. Scientific heritage. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1984, 400. (In Russ.)
19. Vekker L. M. Mind and reality. Unified theory of mental processes. Moscow: Smysl, 1998, 685. (In Russ.)
20. Vekker L. M. Perception and the basics of its modeling. Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningr. ordena Lenina gos. un-ta im. A. A. Zhdanova, 1964, 194. (In Russ.)
21. Stolier R. M., Freeman J. B. Functional and Temporal Considerations for Top-Down Influences in Social Perception. Psychological Inquiry, 2016, 27(4): 352–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1216034
22. Kunitsyna V. N., Panferov V. N. The problem of personal relations in the works of V. N. Myasishchev. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 1992, 13(3): 140–147. (In Russ.)
23. Leontyev D. A. Psychology of meaning: nature, structure and dynamics of semantic. Moscow: Smysl, 2003, 487. (In Russ.)
24. Leontyev D. A. Understanding the Meaning and Meaning of Understanding. Understanding : Experience of Multidisciplinary Research, ed. Brudnyi A. A., Utkin A. V., E. I. Yatsuty. Moscow: Smysl, 2006, 20–27. (In Russ.)
25. He X., Chen J., Li J. Bidirectional semantic associations between social power and weight. International Journal of Psychology, 2018, 53(1): 40–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12255
26. Jzerman H., Koole S. L. From perceptual rags to metaphoric riches-bodily, social, and cultural constraints on sociocognitive metaphors: Comment on Landau, Meier, and Keefer (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 2010, 137(2): 355–361. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1037/a0022373
27. Landau M. J., Meier B. P., Keefer L. A. A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 2010, 136(6): 1045–1067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020970
28. Park В., Judd C. M., Ryan C. S. Social categorization and the representation of variability information. European Review of Social Psychology, eds. Stroebe W., Hewstone M. John Wiley and sons LTD, 1991, vol. 2, 211–245.
29. Taylor S. E., Fiske S. T., Etkoff N. L., Ruderman A. J. Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1978, 36(7): 778–793.
30. Hukhlaev O. E., Tarasov K. O. Factors of choice of ethnic categorization in the situation of informational impact on adolescents and young people. Sotsial'naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo, 2015, 6(3): 64–80. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17759/sps.2015060305
31. Kurysheva O. V. Age aspects of the social categorization. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia 11: Estestvennye nauki, 2013, (1), 77–83. (In Russ.)
32. Serikov G. V. Interpretation of non-verbal behavior in connection with the socio-psychological characteristics of the person. Diss. Cand. Psychol. Sci. Abstr. Rostov-on-Don, 2001, 21. (In Russ.)
33. Yakunin A. P. The social-psychological interpretation by teenagers of the personality of adult. Lichnost', sem'ia i obshchestvo: voprosy pedagogiki i psikhologii, 2015, (53): 107–112. (In Russ.)
34. Heotis E. Cultivating Self-Awareness: Dual Processes in Social Cognition. The journal for spiritual and consciousness studies, 2018, 41(1): 22–28.
35. Mazilov V. A. Methodological problems of psychology at the beginning of the 21st century. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2006, 27(1): 23–34. (In Russ.)
36. Yurevich A. V. Paradigm debates. Metodologiia i istoriia psikhologii, 2007, 2(3): 3–17. (In Russ.)
37. Ushakov D. V. Anatomy of psychological knowledge. Psychological knowledge: The current state and development prospects, eds. Zhuravlev A. L., Yurevich A. V. Moscow: IP RAN, 2018, 71–115. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Panferov V.N., Miklyaeva A.V., Bezgodova S.A. Psychical Process in Social Perception. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2019;21(2):403-413. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-2-403-413
Views:
671
Email this article 