Stereotyped Perception of Animals in the Dutch Language: the Results of a Linguistic Experiment
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-285-296
Abstract
The article describes the results of an associative experiment conducted in 2017, which involved 235 respondents. The author identified stereotyped characteristics of animals in Dutch. On the one hand, the characteristics manifest themselves in free associations with the zoonym. On the other hand, they can be obtained from sustainable comparisons, e. g. "as stupid as a donkey". These comparisons are seen as a sort of phraseological constructions. The experiment had two parts. In the "free associations" part, the respondents had to give a spontaneous reaction on a zoonym as stimulus, while in the "phraseological" part they had to add a missing adjective in a sustainable comparison. The author also intended to reveal the connections between the stereotyped perception of animals reflected in free associations and phraseology. The phraseological part of the experiment resulted in a larger amount of answers than expected. A comparative analysis showed that the stereotyped perception coincided in phraseology and free associations. In addition, the stereotyped perception changes with time and can produce new phraseological units.
About the Author
E. V. TereshkoRussian Federation
7/9, Universitetskaya embankment, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 199034
1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, Russia, 119991
References
1. Mokienko V. M., Volodina T. V., Kuznetsova I. V., Savchenko A. V. Stable comparisons in the phraseology system. Saint-Petersburg: Graifsvald, 2016, 278. (In Russ.)
2. Ivanova E. V. On nests, cows and ends of the earth (on the reconstruction of the language picture of the world). Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriia 9. Filologiia. Vostokovedenie. Zhurnalistika, 2014, (1): 136–143. (In Russ.)
3. Lado R. Linguistics over the boundaries of cultures. New in foreign linguistics. Vol. XXV: Contrastive linguistics, 1989, 34–55. (In Russ.)
4. Ivanova E. V. Phraseological representation of a concept. V mire nauki i iskusstva: voprosy filologii, iskusstvovedeniia i kul'turologii, 2015, (55): 46–51. (In Russ.)
5. Vorkachev S. G. Happiness as a linguocultural concept. Moscow: Gnozis, 2004, 192. (In Russ.)
6. Bochkareva E. V. Influence of the form of the experiment on the core of the associative field of the younger student. Problems of children's speech: Proc. Vseros. Conf., November 24–26, 1999. Saint-Petersburg, 1999, 35–39. (In Russ.)
7. Ershova T. A. Russian-German associative portraits (interpretation experience). Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 1998, 163. (In Russ.)
8. Anthology of concepts, eds. Karasik V. I., Sternin I. A. Volgograd: Paradigma, 2005, Vol. I, 352. (In Russ.)
9. Wierzbicka A. Language. Culture. Cognition. Thans. from Eng. M.: Russkiye slovari, 1997, 411. (In Russ.)
10. Kubriakova E. S., Demiankov V. Z., Luzina L. G., Pankrats Iu. G. Short dictionary of cognitive terms. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, 1996, 245. (In Russ.)
11. Popova Z. D., Sternin I. A. Semantic and cognitive analysis of language. Voronezh: Istoki, 2006, 226. (In Russ.)
12. Karasik V. I. Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002, 477. (In Russ.)
13. Pimenova M. V., Kondrateva O. N. Wanderings of the Russian Soul. Cultural Travel Space: Proc. Sci. Conf., April 8–10, 2003. Saint-Petersburg, 2003, 179–181. (In Russ.)
14. Pimenova M. V. Soul and spirit: features of conceptualization. Kemerovo: Grafika, 2004, 386. (In Russ.)
15. Vorkachev S. G. The concept of happiness in the Russian language consciousness: the experience of linguoculturological analysis. Krasnodar: Izd-vo KubGTU, 2002, 142. (In Russ.)
16. Balashova E. Iu. Concepts love and hate in Russian and American linguistic minds. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Saratov, 2004, 22. (In Russ.)
17. Van Dijk T. A. Prejudice in discourse. An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. 1984, 170.
18. Silant'ev I. V., Shatin Yu. V. Discourse and stereotype. Critique and Semiotics, 2014, (1): 10–17. (In Russ.)
19. Bartmin'skii E. The linguistic image of the world: essays on ethnolinguistics. Moscow: Indrik, 2005, 527. (In Russ.)
20. Putnam H. The meaning of "meaning". Language, Mind and Knowledge, 1975, 7(13): 131–193.
21. Lippmann W. Public opinion. Wading River, Long Island, 1921, 266.
22. Vilinbakhova E. L. The stereotype in linguistics: an object or a research tool? Problems of the language: Proc. First Conference-School "Problems of Language and the View of Young Scientists", September 20–22. Moscow, 2012, 19–28. (In Russ.)
23. Tolstaia S. M. Stereotype and picture of the world. Ethnolinguistics. Onomastics. Etymology: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., September 8–12, 2012. Yekaterinburg, 2009, 262–264. (In Russ.)
24. Krasnykh V. V. "Own" among "alien": myth or reality? Moscow: Gnozis, 2003, 375. (In Russ.)
25. Gibbs R. W., McCarrell N. S. Why Boys Will Be Boys and Girls Will Be Girls: Understanding Colloquial Tautologies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Resesrch, 1990, (19): 125–145.
26. Kleiber G. The possessive via associative anaphor. From NP to DP. Vol. 2: The expression of possession in noun phrases, 2003, 43–71.
27. Fradin B. Anaphorisation et stereotypes nominaux. Lingua, 1984, 64(4): 325–369.
28. Gorbenko M. V. Stereotypes of perception of zoonyms in intercultural communications: an example of the diasporas of Kostanay. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Chelyabinsk, 2009, 241. (In Russ.)
29. Dobrikova K. A. Bestiary in the national linguistic picture of the world. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Chelyabinsk, 2005, 215. (In Russ.)
30. Kirpicheva O. V. Zoonymic stereotypes (based on empiric research). Izv. Volgogr. gos. ped. un-ta, 2016, (9-10): 92–95. (In Russ.)
31. Kowalska-Szubert A. J. De kool en de geit. Nederlandse vaste verbindingen met een dier- of plantelement. Utrecht: Led. Proefschrift Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, 1996, 179.
32. Frumkina R. M. Psycholinguistics. Moscow: Akademiia, 2001, 320. (In Russ.)
33. Vinogradova O. E. Directed associative experiment for describing word semantics. Izvestiia Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im A. I. Gertsena, 2013, (161): 66–73. (In Russ.)
34. Goroshko E. I. Problems of conducting a free associative experiment. Izvestiia Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2005, (3): 53–61. (In Russ.)
35. Ufimtseva N. V. System of verbal consciousness of native speaker as the reflection of the system of culture. Russkii iazyk za rubezhom, 2011, (4): 98–108. (In Russ.)
36. Saharnyi L. V. Introduction to Psycholinguistics. Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1989, 184. (In Russ.)
37. Mokienko V. M., Volodina T. V., Kuznetsova I. V., Savchenko A. V. Stable comparisons in the phraseology system. Saint-Petersburg: Graifsvald, 2016, 278. (In Russ.)
38. Ivanova E. V. Phraseological representation of a concept. V mire nauki i iskusstva: voprosy filologii, iskusstvovedeniia i kul'turologii, 2015, (55): 46–51. (In Russ.)
39. Bochkareva E. V. Influence of the form of the experiment on the core of the associative field of the younger student. Problems of children's speech: Proc. Vseros. Conf., November 24–26, 1999. Saint-Petersburg, 1999, 35–39. (In Russ.)
40. Ershova T. A. Russian-German associative portraits (interpretation experience). Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 1998, 163. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Tereshko E.V. Stereotyped Perception of Animals in the Dutch Language: the Results of a Linguistic Experiment. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2019;21(1):285-296. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-285-296