Hate Speech as a Manipulative Means of Forming the Inimical Image of Russia in British and American Mass-Media (viewed from the Aspect of the English Language Taught to Russian Students)
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-212-222
Abstract
The research features manipulative technologies aimed at forming the inimical image of Russia in British and American mass-media. The inimical conception, when intentionally built, is predetermined by the already existing stereotype of an enemy, whose most evident and manifest features are singled out and enclosed into the image thus constructed. The stereotype, in its turn, can be traced back to the most ancient archetype of a hostile member of a different tribe, perilous to the group he intends to destroy. The image of Russia created by the British and American mass-media is overloaded with negative connotations as contrasted with a highly positive self-image of the British and Americans. Russia is presented as an aggressor that interferes with other countries’ affairs, while its opponents, as they claim, fight against terrorism and meet other global challenges. Nothing is farther from the truth but the manipulative technologies employed help to drive this idea into the readers’ heads. The British and American media-language turns to “hate speech” whenever they refer to Russia. Most effective, though over-exploited, is its constant repetition. All this serves as a substitute for actual facts, logic, and arguments. The question arises: what should EFL students do with the language material that often misinforms or insults their country? The answer is obvious: never degrade yourself by attacking or insulting the opponents. They might be entrapped in the war rhetoric or the stereotypes and be truly convinced of the Russians’ hostility. Consider the facts, but not emotions, and manipulation will miss you or your friendly attitude to Englishmen and Americans as a target.
About the Author
T. P. KarpukhinaRussian Federation
136, Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, Russia, 680035
References
1. Gudkov L. The ideology of the enemy. "Enemies" as a mass syndrome and a mechanism for socio-cultural integration. The image of the enemy, comp. Gudkov L.; ed. Konradova N. Moscow: OGI, 2005, 7–79. (In Russ.)
2. Kaplunenko A. M. On the technological essence of the manipulation of consciousness and its linguistic features. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, 2007, (5): 3–12. (In Russ.)
3. Kozyrev G. I. "The enemy" and "the image of the enemy" in social and political relations. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2008, (1): 31–39. (In Russ.)
4. Kuznetsova N. V. The phenomenon of political correctness in modern political discourse. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Ulan-Ude, 2017, 206. (In Russ.)
5. Syrovatkin S. N., Shevliagina N. V. The main types of holofrastic structures in modern English. Lexical and grammatical compatibility in Germanic languages. Chelyabinsk, 1976, iss. 1, 109–114. (In Russ.)
6. Karpukhina T. P., Kuznetsova N. V. The basis of the politically correct modern political discourse in the French language. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2017, (3): 180–186. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-3-180-186
7. Derrida J. Letter and distinction. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, 2000, 495. (In Russ.)
8. Karpukhina T. P., Kuznetsova N. V. The phenomenon of political correctness in modern Western political discourse: the beginning of the end of a new liberal ideology? Khabarovsk: Izd-vo TOGU, 2018, 226. (In Russ.)
9. Karpukhina T. P. Morphemic repetition in artistic prose viewed in the light of the general aesthetic game theory. Khabarovsk: DVGGU, 2006, 392. (In Russ.)
10. Khromenkov P. N. "Hate speech" in public political rhetoric of the period of the Cold War (by the example of inaugural speeches of the USA presidents form the middle of XX century – the 80s of XX century. Bulletin of Moscow State Region University. Series: Linguistics, 2016, (3): 107–117. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-712X-2016-3-107-117
11. Chudinov A. P. Political linguistics. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 2006, 256. (In Russ.)
12. Gauzhaeva V. A. The concept of extremist ideology. Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve, 2016, (2): 53–55. (In Russ.)
13. Danilova A. A. The word as a means of manipulation in mass media. 2nd ed. Moscow: Dobrosvet; Izd-vo KDU, 2011, 232. (In Russ.)
14. Rimskiy A. V., Artukh A. V. Extremism and terrorism: notion and essential forms. Bulletin of Belgorod state University. Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 2009, (16): 244–250. (In Russ.)
15. Golubykh N. V., Legotin M. P. On the essence of concept essence "extremism". Advokat, 2013, (6): 60–63. (In Russ.)
16. Boziev A. T. On extremism and terrorism ideology. V mire nauchnykh otkrytii, 2015, (3-1): 1004–1018. (In Russ.)
17. Dobrosklonskaya T. G. Issues of studying media texts. Finding in the research of modern English media. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2005, 288. (In Russ.)
18. Kara-Murza S. G. Mind manipulation. Moscow: EKSMO, 2005, 832. (In Russ.)
19. Lippmann W. Public opinion, transl. Barchunova T. V., eds. Levinson K. A., Petrenko K. V. Moscow: Institut fonda "Obshchestvennoe mnenie", 2004, 384. (In Russ.)
20. Kopnina G. A. Speech manipulation. Moscow: Flinta, 2009, 176. (In Russ.)
21. Zaripov R. I. Manipulation impact through metaphors in political discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 2014, (2): 145–158. (In Russ.)
22. Troitskaya T. B. The role of evaluations in the realization of the polemic strategy in German publicistic discourse. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2009, (560): 221–231. (In Russ.)
23. Miklyaeva V. N. Communicative strategies of newspaper discourse and the role of image-bearing idioms in their realisation (on the material of English newspaper comment). Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2010, (596): 235–249. (In Russ.)
24. Balashova L. V. Implementation of the concepts of "friend or foe" in Russian political discourse in the beginning of XXI century. Political Linguistics, 2014, (1): 40–50. (In Russ.)
25. Gudkov L. The ideology of the enemy. "Enemies" as a mass syndrome and a mechanism for socio-cultural integration. The image of the enemy, comp. Gudkov L.; ed. Konradova N. Moscow: OGI, 2005, 7–79. (In Russ.)
26. Kozyrev G. I. "The enemy" and "the image of the enemy" in social and political relations. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2008, (1): 31–39. (In Russ.)
27. Syrovatkin S. N., Shevliagina N. V. The main types of holofrastic structures in modern English. Lexical and grammatical compatibility in Germanic languages. Chelyabinsk, 1976, iss. 1, 109–114. (In Russ.)
28. Derrida J. Letter and distinction. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, 2000, 495. (In Russ.)
29. Karpukhina T. P. Morphemic repetition in artistic prose viewed in the light of the general aesthetic game theory. Khabarovsk: DVGGU, 2006, 392. (In Russ.)
30. Chudinov A. P. Political linguistics. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 2006, 256. (In Russ.)
31. Danilova A. A. The word as a means of manipulation in mass media. 2nd ed. Moscow: Dobrosvet; Izd-vo KDU, 2011, 232. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Karpukhina T.P. Hate Speech as a Manipulative Means of Forming the Inimical Image of Russia in British and American Mass-Media (viewed from the Aspect of the English Language Taught to Russian Students). The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2019;21(1):212-222. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-212-222