Propositional-Frame Approach to the Description of Families of Russian Cognate Words as a Representation of Mental Discourse
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-205-211
Abstract
The research features families of cognate words in the Russian language as a dynamic phenomenon. Frame and proposition were adopted as the basic units of representation of word families. The study focused on derivatives with the borrowed formants -атор/-тор (-ator/-tor). Most of the propositions with -атор revealed a high degree of typification. This typification of propositions undergoes changes under the influence of the tendencies of the Russian linguistic system and as a result of assimilation. The mutation occurs both by changing the actants in the proposition, as well as by expanding the actant paradigm and the appearance of new members in the proposition. Assimilation results in polysemic potency derivatives. Occasional meanings of the analyzed derivatives form a new family with a typified frame structure. The nests are divided into propositions typical for similar families, with the same limited set of actants. The propositional-frame approach to the description of the families of cognate words makes it possible to express the knowledge of native speakers about the world, as well as to represent the epistemological basis of mental discourse.
About the Author
T. V. Kalyuzhnaya
Moscow Pedagogical State University (Anapa branch)
Russian Federation
88, Astrakhanskaya St., Anapa, Russia, 353410
Russian Federation
88, Astrakhanskaya St., Anapa, Russia, 353410
References
1. Araeva L. A. Word-Formation type as semantic microsystem: Suffixal substances (on the material of Russian dialects). Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 1994, 223. (In Russ.)
2. Osadchiy M. A. Monohull vocabulary of Russian folk dialects. Frame structure of the nest. Moscow: Librokom, 2009, 304. (In Russ.)
3. Evseeva I. V. Cognitive modeling of the word-formation system of the Russian language (a case study of complex units). Dr. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Kemerovo, 2011, 49. (In Russ.)
4. Kovaleva T. V. Derivatives of -ator/-tor in the derivational system of the Russian language. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Kemerovo, 2004, 191. (In Russ.)
5. Obraztsova M. N. Propositional-frame organization of families of cognate words with the nuclear component "pchela" (bee). Modern problems of science and education, 2013, (4). Available at: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=9668 (accessed 27.07.2018). (In Russ.)
6. Shirshov I. A. Plurality of word-formation motivation in the modern Russian language. Dr. Philol. Sci. Diss. Rostov-on-Don, 1982, 410. (In Russ.)
7. Ginzburg E. L. Word-formation and syntax. Moscow: Nauka, 1979, 264. (In Russ.)
8. Vinogradov V. V. Lexicology and lexicography. Selected works. Moscow: Nauka, 1977, 312. (In Russ.)
9. Minskiy M. Frames for presentation of knowledge. Moscow: Energiia, 1979, 152. (In Russ.)
10. Lebedeva N. B. Polysituational character of verbal semantics (a case study of Russian prefixed verbs). Dr. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Tomsk, 2000, 55. (In Russ.)
11. Araeva L. A. The Word-Forming Type: On the problem of definition. Actual Problems of Russian Studies: Proc. All-Russian Sci. Conf., dedicated to the 70th anniversary of O. I. Blinova, Professor of the Russian Language Department, TSU. Tomsk: TGU, 2001, 57–58. (In Russ.)
12. Kubryakova E. S. The role of word formation in the formation of the linguistic worldview. The Role of the Human Factor in Language: Language and Picture of the World, ed. Serebrennikov B. A. Moscow: Nauka, 1988, 141–172. (In Russ.)
13. Kubryakova E. S. Types of linguistic meanings. The semantics of the derived word. Moscow: Nauka, 1981, 200. (In Russ.)
14. Rezanova Z. I. Semantic questions of word formation. Producing word. Tomsk: Izd. Tom. un-ta, 1991, 273. (In Russ.)
15. Rezanova Z. I. Functional aspect of word formation. Russian derived name. Tomsk: Izd. Tom. un-ta, 1996, 219. (In Russ.)
16. Yantsenetskaya M. N. Semantic issues of the theory of word formation. Tomsk: Izd. Tom. un-ta, 1979, 242. (In Russ.)
17. Yantsetskaya M. N. The propositional aspect of word formation (Review of Works of Siberian Derivatologists). Actual Problems of Regional Linguistics and History of Siberia. Kemerovo, 1992, 4–33. (In Russ.)
18. Evseeva I. V., Ponomareva E. A. Lexico-word-formation nest: cognitive modeling. Krasnoyarsk: SFU, 2018, 199. (In Russ.)
19. Evseeva I. V., Kreydlin G. E. Frame modeling of fragments of lexical-derivational nests with the 'disease' semantics. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2017, (49): 5–23. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/49/1
20. Dokulil M. Tvořeni slov v češtinĕ: Teorie odvozování slov. Praha: Nakl, Československé akademie věd, 1962, 263.
Review
For citations:
Kalyuzhnaya T.V. Propositional-Frame Approach to the Description of Families of Russian Cognate Words as a Representation of Mental Discourse. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2019;21(1):205-211. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-205-211
Views:
583
Email this article 