Cognitive Script of Verbalization of Concept "Threat" in Media Discourse (as Exemplified in D. Trump's Statements)
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-164-170
Abstract
The paper presents such basic units of cognitive linguistics as frame, script, and concept from the perspective of theories and concepts introduced by leading scientists. It introduces some results of the construction of the nominative field of the concept "threat". The research featured the concept "threat" in the political mass media discourse as a universal means of speech influence. The lexical units under analysis belonged both to the core and periphery of the nominative field of the concept. The authors defined the most frequent scripts of the concept "threat", both general and particular, e. g. direct threat, indirect threat, explicit threat, and implicit threat. Their structural characteristics were based on the examples from D. Trump’s statements. The most characteristic attributes of the concept "threat" proved to be verbs of destructive semantics, nuclear lexemes of the concept field, etc. This article reflects the features of the verbal representation of the concept "threat", as well as the purposes of the speech act of threat as a universal leverage in the modern political communication.
About the Authors
K. O. GausRussian Federation
6, Krasnaya St., Kemerovo, Russia, 650000
M. Yu. Riabova
Russian Federation
6, Krasnaya St., Kemerovo, Russia, 650000
References
1. Kubriakova E. S., Demiankov V. Z., Luzina L. G., Pankrats Iu. G. Short dictionary of cognitive terms. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, 1996, 245. (In Russ.)
2. Gofman I. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience, eds. Batygin G. S., Kozlova L. A. Moscow: Institut sotsiologii RAN, 2003, 752. (In Russ.)
3. Riabova M. Iu. Linguistic categories of ideological analysis of mass media discourse. Tomsk: Izd-vo TGPU, 2008, 96. (In Russ.)
4. Minsky M. A framework for representing knowledge. Frame conceptions and text understanding, ed. Metzing D. B.; NY: Gruyter, 1980, 1–25.
5. Schank R., Abelson R. Scripts Plans and Knowledge. Advance Papers of Fourth Intern. Joint Conf. on Artif. Intell, 1975, (2): 151–157.
6. Karasik V. I. Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Moscow: GNOZIS, 2004, 477. (In Russ.)
7. Boldyrev N. N. Conceptual basis of language. Cognitive language studies. Iss. IV. Conceptualization of the world in language. Moscow: In-t iazykoznaniia RAN; Tambov: Izdatel'skii dom TGU im. G. R. Derzhavina, 2009, 25–77. (In Russ.)
8. Baranov A. N. Introduction to Applied Linguistics. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2001, 358. (In Russ.)
9. Zhabotinskaia S. A. Conceptual analysis: frame types. At the junction of the paradigms of linguistic knowledge at the beginning of the XXI century: grammar, semantics, word formation: Proc. Intern. Conf. Kaliningrad: Izd-vo KGU, 2003, 141–159. (In Russ.)
10. Gaus K. O., Riabova M. Yu. The concept "threat" in media discourse. Current issues of philology and translation studies in the light of modern research: Proc. XIV Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., eds. Kormilina N. V., Shugaeva N. Iu., October 20, 2017. Cheboksary: Chuvashskii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet im. I. Ia. Iakovleva, 2017, 74–78. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Gaus K.O., Riabova M.Yu. Cognitive Script of Verbalization of Concept "Threat" in Media Discourse (as Exemplified in D. Trump's Statements). The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2019;21(1):164-170. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-164-170