Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120
Abstract
The article features preliminary "conceptual optics" necessary for understanding the problem of thinking from the perspective of post- non-classical psychology. The study focused on methodological gaps in the formulation and solution of the problem of thinking within the framework of positivist-oriented approaches. They proved to be connected with building a one-dimensional-instrumental view of a thinking person as a gnoseological subject. The view is often reduced to an operator of cognitive processes, artificially derived from the framework of one’s own historicity and existential datum of life. It reveals the existential-anthropological givenness of human thinking, taken in the context of one’s own life world and one’s own life relationships, as well as in the context of the trans-perspective of becoming and complicating its "cogital identity". The author substantiates the view that thinking of a holistically understood person acts as a form of life-realization, and all thinking events are evidence of one’s attempts to thematisation and constitution of one’s "cogital identity" and resistance to "co- deindividualization". The study revealed a need to expand the research focus of the psychology of thinking, so that its positive heuristics were not limited to the mental apparatus of the averaged operator of cognitive processes, but include existential givenness and the capabilities of a living historical personality that realizes meaningful existential relations with itself and the world in thinking.
About the Author
N. I. NelyubinRussian Federation
4а, Partizanskaya St., Omsk, Russia, 644099
References
1. Mamardashvili M. K. Aesthetics of thinking. Moscow: Moskovskaia shkola politicheskikh issledovanii, 2000, 416. (In Russ.)
2. Ado P. Spiritual exercises and ancient philosophy. Moscow, Saint-Petersburg: Stepnoi veter; Kolo, 2005, 448. (In Russ.)
3. Frank S. L. The subject of knowledge. Human soul. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka, 1995, 656. (In Russ.)
4. Markuze G. Eros and civilization. One-dimensional man. A study of the ideology of a developed industrial society. Moscow: AST, 2002, 526. (In Russ.)
5. Bibikhin V. V. Recognize yourself. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka, 1998, 577. (In Russ.)
6. Leont’ev A. N. Lectures on general psychology. Moscow: Smysl, 2000, 509. (In Russ.)
7. Yanitsky M. S., Seryi A. V., Pelekh Yu. V. The value-and-meaning paradigm as a basis of the post-nonclassical pedagogical psychology. Philosophy of education, 2013, (1): 175–186. (In Russ.)
8. Jaspers K. Mind and existence, transl. Sudakov A. K. Moscow: Kanon+; Reabilitatsiia, 2013, 336. (In Russ.)
9. Fromm E. Man for himself. Moscow: AST: AST MOSKVA, 2010, 350. (In Russ.)
10. Nelyubin N. I. Ersatz thinking as an attribute of human quasi-identity in the postmodern era. Complex human studies: psychology: Proc. VII Siberian Psychological Forum. November 28–29, 2017. Tomsk, 2017, 159–162. (In Russ.)
11. Nelyubin N. I. Ersatz thinking as an attribute of the existence of modern man. Psikhologiia i psikhotekhnika, 2017, (4): 37–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0722.2017.4.24320 (In Russ.)
12. Piaget J. Psychology of intellect. Saint-Petersburg: Piter, 2003, 192. (In Russ.)
13. Bruner J. Life as a narrative. Postneklassicheskaia psikhologiia. Sotsialnyi konstruktsionizm i narrativnyi podkhod, 2005, (1): 9–29. (In Russ.)
14. Berdiaev N. A. About the appointment of a person. Moscow: Respublika, 1993, 383. (In Russ.)
15. Ukhtomskii A. A. Dominant. Saint-Petersburg: Piter, 2002, 448. (In Russ.)
16. Heidegger M. What is called thinking? Transl. Sagetdinov Е. Moscow: Territoriia budushchego, 2006, 320. (In Russ.)
17. Zavershneva E. Yu. L. S. Vygotsky’s notebooks, notes, scientific notebooks: Family archive findings. Voprosy psihologii, 2008, (1): 132–145. (In Russ.)
18. Mamardashvili M. K. Arrow of knowledge. Moscow: Taideks Ko, 2004, 264. (In Russ.)
19. Klochko V. E., Galajinskiy E. V., Krasnoryadtseva O. M., Lukyanov O. V. System anthropological psychology: framework of categories. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2015, (56): 9–20. (In Russ.)
20. Vasil’ev I. A., Popluzhnyi V. L., Tikhomirov O. K. Emotions and thinking. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1980, 192. (In Russ.)
21. Shchedrovitskii G. P. Thinking – Understanding – Reflection. Moscow: Nasledie MMK, 2005, 800. (In Russ.)
22. Horuzhii S. S. Lantern Diogenes. A critical retrospective of European anthropology. Moscow: Institut filosofii, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy, 2010, 688. (In Russ.)
23. Krasnoryadtseva O. M. Sensitivity to problems as description of innovative potential of a personality. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2009, (33): 13–19. (In Russ.)
24. Berdiaev N. A. The meaning of creativity (the experience of justifying the person). Moscow: Izd-vo G. A. Lemana i S. I. Sakharova, 1916, 358. (In Russ.)
25. Heidegger M. Prolegomena to the history of the concept of time, transl. Borisov Е. Tomsk: Vodolei, 1998, 384. (In Russ.)
26. Guseinov A. A., Lektorsky V. A., Shchedrina T. G., Chubarov I. M., Porus V. N., Janzen W., Pruzhinin B. I., Avtonomova N. S., Naiman E. A., Venditti M., Mikeshina L. A., Dennes M. Gustav Shpet and modern philosophy of humanitarian knowledge (a round-table discussion). Voprosy filosofii, 2010, (7): 3–39. (In Russ.)
27. Kasavin I. T. Meaning as a problem of epistemology and science. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2007, (3): 5–16. (In Russ.)
28. Psychology and ethics: the experience of building a discussion, ed. Bratus’ B. S. Samara: Bahrakh-M, 1999, 128. (In Russ.)
29. Lukyanov O. V. Identity as an element of transtemporal world and the front of existential experience. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2007, (26): 31–35. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Nelyubin N.I. Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2019;21(1):112-120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120