Analysis of Neurocognitive Development of Moderate and Late Preterm Children in Early Childhood Using Bayley-III
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-56-65
Abstract
The article features an empirical study of the development of neurocognitive functions in moderate and late preterm children at the age of 3, 5, 10, 14, and 25 months. To date, this population of infants is 75–80 % of the total number of premature infants, but specialists of different profiles do not give enough attention to this group of children, which limits the amount of information regarding their neurocognitive development, in spite of the fact that prematurity at any gestation period gives the right to refer the child to a risk group of different impairments. Premature birth has a certain impact on the development of the infant’s brain, affecting the important processes of differentiation of neurons, myelination, synaptogenesis, etc. Neurocognitive functions were measured by the Bayley Scales behavioral technique, third edition (Bayley-III). The technique makes it possible to assess the cognitive development, the development of receptive and expressive communication, as well as fine and gross motor skills. The research demonstrated that moderate and late prematurity has a selective effect on the development of neurocognitive functions, and the degree of impact depends on the stage of ontogenesis and the sphere of development.
About the Authors
N. I. Bakushkina
B. N. Yeltsin Ural Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
19, Mira St., Yekaterinburg, Russia, 620002
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/D-6985-2019
T. V. Rogacheva
Regional Center for Rehabilitation of Disabled Persons
Russian Federation
173 A, Belinskiy St., Yekaterinburg, Russia, 620089
Russian Federation
173 A, Belinskiy St., Yekaterinburg, Russia, 620089
References
1. Muglia L. J., Katz M. The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2010, 362(6): 529–535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0904308
2. Kuzminykh T. U., Arutiunian A. V., Prokopenko V. M. New approaches to the treatment of women with the threat of premature termination of pregnancy. Vestnik Rossiiskoi assotsiatsii akusherov-ginekologov, 1997, (3): 49–51. (In Russ.)
3. Stephens B. E., Vohr B. R. Neurodevelopmental outcome of the premature infant. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 2009, 56(3): 631–646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2009.03.005
4. McGrath M. M., Sullivan M. C., Lester B. M., Oh W. Longitudinal neurologic follow-up in neonatal intensive care unit survivors with various neonatal morbidities. Pediatrics, 2000, 106(6): 1397–1405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.106.6.1397
5. Volgina S. A., Mendelevich V. D. Neuropsychiatric development of premature infants in remote periods of life. Neurological Bulletin, 2001, (3-4): 84–88. (In Russ.)
6. Johnson S., Marlow N. Early and long-term outcome of infants born extremely preterm. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2016, 102(1): 97–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-309581
7. Glass H., Costarino A., Stayer S., Brett C., Cladis F., Davis P. Outcomes for Extremely Premature Infants. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2015, 120(6): 1337–1351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000000705
8. Khashu M., Narayanan M., Bhargava S., Osiovich H. Perinatal outcomes associated with preterm birth at 33 to 36 weeks’ gestation: a population-based cohort study. Pediatrics, 2009, 123(1): 109–113. DOI: https://doi.
9. org/10.1542/peds.2007-3743
10. Kitsommart R., Janes M., Mahajan V., Rahman A., Seidlitz W., Wilson J., Paes B. Outcomes of Late-Preterm Infants: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Canadian Study. Clinical Pediatrics, 2009, 48(8): 844–850. DOI: https://doi.
11. org/10.1177/0009922809340432
12. Vasilyeva M. J., Chernego D. I., Mukhamedrakhimov R. J. Developmental status of preterm infants living in families and orphanages during their first year of life. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriia 12. Psikhologiia. Sotsiologiia. Pedagogika, 2010, (4): 193–201. (In Russ.)
13. Kugelman A., Colin A. A. Late Preterm Infants: Near Term But Still in a Critical Developmental Time Period. Pediatrics, 2013, 132(4): 741–751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1131
14. Petrini J. R., Dias T., McCormick M. C., Massolo M. L., Green N. S., Escobar G. J. Increased Risk of Adverse Neurological Development for Late Preterm Infants. The Journal of Pediatrics, 2009, 154(2): 169–176.e3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.08.020
15. Blencowe H., Lee A. C., Cousens S., Bahalim A., Narwal R., Zhong N., Chou D., Say L., Modi N., Katz J., Vos Th., Marlow N., Lawn J. E. Preterm birth-associated neurodevelopmental impairment estimates at regional and global levels for 2010. Pediatric Research, 2013, 74(S1): 17–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2013.204
16. Escobar G. J., Clark R. H., Greene J. D. Short-Term Outcomes of Infants Born at 35 and 36 Weeks Gestation: We Need to Ask More Questions. Seminars in Perinatology, 2006, 30(1): 28–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2006.01.005
17. Williams J., Pugh Y. The Late Preterm. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, 2018, 30(4): 431–443.
18. Blencowe H., Cousens S., Chou D., Oestergaard M., Say L., Moller A.-B., Kinney M., Lawn J. Born Too Soon: The global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reproductive Health, 2013, 10(1): S2. DOI: https://doi.
19. org/10.1186/1742-4755-10-s1-s2
20. Gill J. V., Boyle E. M. Outcomes of infants born near term. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2016, 102(2): 194–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-309584
21. Altimier L., Phillips R. M. The Neonatal Integrative Developmental Care Model: Seven Neuroprotective Core Measures for Family-Centered Developmental Care. Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews, 2013, 13(1): 9–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.nainr.2012.12.002
22. Tau G. Z., Peterson B. S. Normal development of brain circuits. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2010, (35): 147–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.115
23. Webb S. J., Monk C. S., Nelson Ch. A. Mechanisms of Postnatal Neurobiological Development: Implications for Human Development. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2001, 19(2): 147–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn1902_2
24. Volpe J. J. Neurology of the Newborn. 4th ed. PA: Saunders Elsevier, 2008, 715.
25. Petruhin A. S. Neurology of childhood. Moscow: Meditsina, 2004, 784. (In Russ.)
26. Skvortsov I. A., Ermolenko N. A. Development of children’s nervous system in norm and pathology. Moscow: MEDpressinform, 2003, 367. (In Russ.)
27. Volpe J. J. Brain injury in premature infants: a complex amalgam of destructive and developmental disturbances. Lancet Neurol, 2009, (8): 110–124.
28. Escobar G. J., Greene J. D., Hulac P., Kincannon N., Bischoff H., Gardner M. N., Armstrong M. A., France E. K. Rehospitalisation after birth hospitalisation: patterns among infants of all gestations. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2005, 90(2): 125–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2003.039974
29. Eryigit-Madzwamuse S., Strauss V., Baumann N., Bartmann P., Wolke D. Personality of adults who were born very preterm. ADC Fetal & Neonatal, 2015,100(6): F524–F529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-308007
30. Breeman L. D., Jaekel J., Baumann N., Bartmann P., Wolke D. Preterm Cognitive Function Into Adulthood. Pediatrics, 2015, 136(3): 415–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-0608
31. Bradfield L. Core Curriculum for Neonatal Intensive Care Nursing. Nurse Education in Practice, 2010, 10(6): e59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2010.04.001
32. Bayley N. Bayley scales of infant and toddler development. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, 2006, 267.
33. Weiss L., Oakland T., Aylward G. Bayley-III, clinical use and interpretation. London: Elsevier, 2010, 240.
34. Adams-Chapman I., Bann C. M., Vaucher Y. E., Stoll B. J. Association between Feeding Difficulties and Language Delay in Preterm Infants Using Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Third Edition. The Journal of Pediatrics, 2013, 163(3): 680–685.e3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.03.006
35. Steenis L. J. P., Verhoeven M., Hessen D. J., Baar van A. L. Performance of Dutch Children on the Bayley III: A Comparison Study of US and Dutch Norms. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10(8): e0132871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132871
36. Simpson S., D’Aprano A., Tayler C., Toon Khoo S., Highfold R. Validation of a culturally adapted developmental screening tool for Australian Aboriginal children: Early findings and next steps. Early Human Development, 2016, (103): 91–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.08.005
37. Hanlon C., Medhin G., Worku B., Tomlinson M., Alem A., Dewey M., Prince M. Adapting the Bayley Scales of infant and toddler development in Ethiopia: evaluation of reliability and validity. Child: Care, Health and Development, 2016, 42(5): 699–708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12371
38. Hicks M. S., Sauve R. S., Robertson C. M. T., Joffe A. R., Alton G., Creighton G., Boss D. B., Rebeyka I. M. Early childhood language outcomes after arterial switch operation: a prospective cohort study. SpringerPlus, 2016, 5(1): 1681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3344-5
39. Kirchner R. M., Martens M. A., Andridge R. R. Adaptive Behavior and Development of Infants and Toddlers with Williams Syndrome. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016, (7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00598
Review
For citations:
Bakushkina N.I., Rogacheva T.V. Analysis of Neurocognitive Development of Moderate and Late Preterm Children in Early Childhood Using Bayley-III. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2019;21(1):56-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-56-65
Views:
828
Email this article 