FUTURE TENSE IN THE PORTUGUESE LINGUISTIC TRADITION
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2018-4-205-210
Abstract
The paper deals with the concept of the Future tense found in the Portuguese linguistic tradition. As the Portuguese linguistics appeared in the context of the European linguistic tradition, the first part of the article features the main views on the Future tense from the Antiquity to the Renaissance. The second part of the article is devoted to the Future tense in the Portuguese linguistics in XVI – early XX century, namely Latin and Portuguese grammar books, as well as those on other European and some non-European languages. The present research has shown that the Renaissance scholars already raised the questions that remain topical in the current linguistics. Those included the problems of relative tenses, the tense distance, the differences of the Future tense expression in languages with different structures, the tense as a complex functional semantic category that is not limited by the verb features, the close connection between the Future tense and the modality. Linguists of the subsequent epochs contributed to the investigation of these issues: the descriptions made in the early XX century are very close to the modern ones.
About the Author
P. E. Egizaryan
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, Russia, 119991
https://www.researcherid.com/rid/V-3255-2018
References
1. Gaydenko P. P. Vremia. Dlitelnost'. Vechnost'. Problema vremeni v evropeiskoy filosofii i nauke [Time. Duration. Eternity. Problem of time in the European philosophy and science]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiia, 2006, 464.
2. Alpatov V. M. Istoriia lingvisticheskikh uchenii [History of the linguistic doctrines]. 4th ed. Moscow: Iazyki slavyanskoy kultury, 2005, 368.
3. Kosarik M. A. Opisanie iazykovoi sistemy v rannikh lingvisticheskikh pamiatnikakh Portugalii. T. I: Fonetika. Morfemika. Morfologiia imennykh chastei rechi [Description of the language system in the early linguistic documents of Portugal. Vol. 1: Fonetics. Morphemics. Morphology of the nominal parts of speech]. Moscow: MAKS Press, 2013, 228.
4. Arnauld A., Lancelot C. Grammatika obschaia i ratsionalnaia Por-Roialia [General and rational grammar of Port-Royal]. Ed. Stepanov Yu. S. Moscow: Progress, 1990, 272.
5. Oliveira F. d. Grammatica da lingoagem portuguesa. Lisboa: Germam Galharde, 1536, 38. Available at: http://purl.pt/120/3/#/1 (accessed 04.03.2018).
6. Barros J. d. Grammatica da lingua Portuguesa. Lisboa: Lodovicus Rotorigius, 1540, 60. Available at: http://purl.pt/12148/5/#/3 (accessed 04.03.2018).
7. Roboredo A. d. Methodo grammatical para todas as Linguas. Ed. Kossarik M. A. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional-Casa de Moeda, 2002, 350.
8. Kossarik M. A. A obra de Amaro de Roboredo. Questões de historiografia linguística portuguesa. Roboredo A. d. Methodo grammatical para todas as Linguas. Ed. Kossarik M. A. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional-Casa de Moeda, 2002, 7–63.
9. Verney L. A. Verdadeiro metodo de estudar. Valensa: Antonio Balle, t. 1 (1746): 327. Available at: http://purl.pt/118/4/ (accessed 04.03.2018).
10. Verney L. A. Verdadeiro metodo de estudar. Valensa: Antonio Balle, t. 2 (1746): 302. Available at: http://purl.pt/118/4/ (accessed 04.03.2018).
11. Leite M. Q. Considerações sobre uso e Norma na Gramática Portuguesa – O Methodo Grammatical para todas as Linguas (1619), de Amaro de Roboredo. Filologia e Linguistica Portuguesa, 13, no. 2 (2011): 337–368.
12. Lião D. N. d. Origem da lingoa portuguesa. Lisboa: Pedro Crasbeeck, 1606, 150. Available at: http://purl.pt/50/1 (accessed 04.03.2018).
13. Severim de Faria M. Discursos varios politicos. Novamente reimpressos e corrigidos segundo a Edição feita em Evora no anno de 1624. Lisboa: Impressão Regia, 1805, 348. Available at: http://purl.pt/966/1 (accessed 04.03.2018).
14. Pereira B. Ars grammaticae pro lingua lusitana addiscenda latino. Lugdunum: Laurentius Anisson, 1672, 323. Available at: https://play.google.com/books (accessed 04.03.2018).
15. Távora F. d. Grammatica hebraea novissime edita. Conimbrica: I. Alvarus, 1566, 69. Available at: http://purl.pt/23236/1 (accessed 04.03.2018).
16. Porkhomovskii V. Ia. Poroda [Conjugation]. Iazykoznanie. Bolʹshoi entsiklopedicheskii slovarʹ [Linguistics. Big Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Ed. Iartseva V. N. Moscow: Bolʹshaia Rossiiskaia entsiklopediia 1998, 386.
17. Kosarik M. A. Sotsiolingvisticheskaia problematika v rannikh portugal'skikh sochineniiakh o iazyke [Sociolinguistic problems in the early Portuguese writings on language]. Moscow: MAKS Press, 2013, 208.
18. Anchieta J. d. Arte de grammatica da lingua mais usada na costa do Brasil. Lipsia: B. G. Teubner, 1874, 82. Available at: https://play.google.com/books (accessed 04.03.2018).
19. Argote J. C. d. Regras da lingua portugueza, espelho da lingua latina, ou disposição para facilitar o ensino da lingua latina pelas regras da portugueza. Lisboa: Officina da musica, 1725, 360. Available at: http://purl.pt/10/3/#/1 (accessed 04.03.2018).
20. Barboza J. S. Grammatica philosophica da lingua portugueza ou principios da grammatica geral applicados á nossa linguagem. 2 ed. Lisboa: Academia Real das Sciencias, 1830, 458. Available at: http://www4.iel.unicamp.br/biblioteca/gramatica.php (accessed 04.03.2018).
21. Coelho F. A. Noções elementares de grammatica portugueza. Porto: Lemos, 1891, 130. Available at: https://bibdig.biblioteca.unesp.br/handle/10/26050 (accessed 04.03.2018).
22. Cortesão A. A. Nova gramática portuguesa. 7.a ed. Coimbra: F. França Amado, 1907, 160. Available at: https://bibdig.biblioteca.unesp.br/handle/10/26051 (accessed 04.03.2018).
Review
For citations:
Egizaryan P.E. FUTURE TENSE IN THE PORTUGUESE LINGUISTIC TRADITION. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2018;(4):205-210. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2018-4-205-210
Views:
645
Email this article 