FACTORS OF LINGUISTIC AND CULTURAL TRANSFER IN NAMING UNITS OF SOCIAL DISEASES: A DIACHRONIC APPROACH
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2018-4-175-181
Abstract
This article deals with the processes of linguistic and cultural transfer of nominations of the social diseases sphere in the diachronic aspect, as well as the factors that lead to the appearance and consolidation of new linguistic units in the language. The study features nominations related to the social diseases and medical spheres taken from bilingual and multilingual medical dictionaries and dictionaries of foreign words, scientific and popular science literature. We can distinguish the following diachronic classification of English words in Russian language: 1) non-assimilated anglicisms; 2) partially assimilated anglicisms; 3) fully assimilated anglicisms. The extralinguistic factors of linguistic and cultural transfer may include the interaction of cultures and the authority of the source language. The intralinguistic factors may include the absence of the equivalent in the native language, the tendency to use one word instead of a descriptive phrase, impossibility of formation of derivatives in the native language.
About the Authors
E. V. Arkhipova
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation
6, Krasnaya St., Kemerovo, Russia, 650000
Russian Federation
6, Krasnaya St., Kemerovo, Russia, 650000
A. G. Fomin
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation
6, Krasnaya St., Kemerovo, Russia, 650000
Russian Federation
6, Krasnaya St., Kemerovo, Russia, 650000
References
1. Bochegova N. N., Grishkova L. V., Portniagin D. V., Stepanenko O. A., Tsytsarkina N. N. Teoriia i praktika filologicheskogo analiza teksta i diskursa [Theory and practice of philological analysis of text and discourse]. Kurgan: Izd-vo Kurganskogo gos. un-ta, 2011, 250.
2. Ter-Minasova S. G. Iazyk i mezhkul’turnaia kommunikatsiia [Language and cross-cultural communication]. Moscow: Slovo, 2008, 264.
3. Kondrat’ev M. Iu., Il’in V. A. Azbuka sotsial’nogo psikhologa-praktika [The alphabet of the practicing social psychologist]. Moscow: Per Se, 2007, 464.
4. Khrolenko A. T. Osnovy lingvokul’turologii [Basics of cultural linguistics]. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 2009, 184.
5. Fomin A. G., Arkhipova E. V. Linguistic and cultural transfer in euphemistic naming of social diseases. Zhurnal Sibirskogo federalʹnogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye nauki = Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 11, no. 1 (2018): 63–70.
6. Hymes Dell. Studies in the History of Linguistics: Traditions and Paradigms. London: Indiana Univ. Press, vol. VIII (2008): 519.
7. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ meditsinskikh terminov [The encyclopedic dictionary of medical terms]. Ed. Pokrovskii V. I. Moscow: Meditsina, 2001, 960.
8. Fray, Mac. Understanding Medical Terminology. St. Louis. 2005, 246.
9. Vasilenko I. A. Dialog kul’tur, dialog tsivilizatsii [Dialogue of cultures, dialogue of civilizations]. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk = Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 66, no. 5 (1996): 394–402.
10. Andrews D. R. Sociocultural perspectives on language change in diaspora. Soviet immigrants in the United States. Philadelphina, PA: John Benjamins, 1998, 347.
11. Crystal. D. English as a global language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 212.
12. Efrangeon. R. Medical terms. Their origin and construction. London: Heinemmann medical books, 1971, 102.
13. Schmidt I. E. Structural units of medical and biomedical terms. Springfield: Charles and Thomas Publisher, 1987, 172.
14. Food W. E. Scientific words. Their structure and meaning. Greenwood press, 2010, 220.
Review
For citations:
Arkhipova E.V., Fomin A.G. FACTORS OF LINGUISTIC AND CULTURAL TRANSFER IN NAMING UNITS OF SOCIAL DISEASES: A DIACHRONIC APPROACH. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2018;(4):175-181. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2018-4-175-181
Views:
702
Email this article 