Axiological Sphere in Adolescents with Different Levels of Agency Formation
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2018-3-140-152
Abstract
The article presents the results of a psychological research aimed at studying the axiological sphere in adolescents with different levels of agency formation. The authors conducted a thorough theoretical analysis and formulated some theses concerning the dynamics of the axiological sphere during the stage of development. The empiric research involved 71 respondents. The reference set was split into two groups according to agency formation level. The data obtained were interpreted according to criterion and correlation analyses. The axiological sphere of young men and women with better formed agency was characterized by a higher degree of crystallization of values that determine behavior and activity, strong pro-social orientation, and non-adaptive essence; their relations with other people were more productive, although they maintained a significant autonomy. Those with a lower degree of agency formation were characterized by hedonistic life-orientation, adaptibility of behavior, and a tendency to maintain their position in the system of social interaction.
About the Authors
M. A. Frizen
Vitus Bering Kamchatka State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina A. Frizen
4, Pogranichnaya St., Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, 683032
L. O. Kostenko
Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky School No. 1 for students with disabilities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lyubava O. Kostenko
101, Pogranichnaya St., Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, 683032
References
1. Rubinshtein S. L. Bytie i soznanie. Chelovek i mir [Existence and consciousness]. Saint-Petersburg: Peter, 2003, 512.
2. Asmolov A. G. Psikhologiia lichnosti: printsipy obshchepsikhologicheskogo analiza [Psychology of personality: principles of general psychological analysis]. Moscow: Smysl: Akademiia, 2002, 416.
3. Bratusʹ B. S. Lichnostnye smysly po A. N. Leontʹevu i problema vertikali soznaniia [Personal meanings according to A. N. Leontiev and the problem of the vertical of consciousness]. Traditsii i perspektivy deiatelʹnostnogo podkhoda v psikhologii: shkola A. N. Leontʹeva [Traditions and perspectives of the activity approach in psychology: the school of A. N. Leontiev]. Eds. Voiskunskii A. E., Zhdan A. N., Tikhomirova O. K. Moscow: Smysl, 1999, 284–298.
4. Ginzburg M. R. Tsennostno-smyslovye i prostranstvenno-vremennye aspekty razvitiia v podrostkovom i iunosheskom vozrastakh [Value-semantic and spatio-temporal aspects of development in adolescence and youth]. Mir psikhologii = World of Psychology, no. 1 (2017): 125–129.
5. Kaliteyevskaya E. R., Leontiev D. A. Puti stanovleniia samodeterminatsii lichnosti v podrostkovom vozraste [Formation of personality self-determination in adolescence]. Voprosy psikhologii = Questions of psychology, no. 3 (2006): 49–55.
6. Leontiev D. A. Psikhologiia smysla. Priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoi realʹnosti [Psychology of meaning. Nature, structure and dynamics of semantic reality]. Moscow: Smysl, 2003, 488.
7. Anikina V. G., Tsvetaeva A. S. Lichnostnaia refleksiia kak psikhologicheskii mekhanizm stanovleniia samosoznaniia v podrostkovom i iunosheskom vozrastakh [Personal Reflection as a Psychological Mechanism of Self-Identification Formation at the Age of Adolescence and Youth]. Konferentsium ASOU: sbornik nauchnykh trudov i materialov nauchno-prakticheskikh konferentsii = Conference of the Academy of Social Management: a collection of scientific papers and materials of scientific and practical conferences, no. 3 (2015): 21–33.
8. Vesna E. B., Frizen M. A. Osobennosti razvitiia smyslovoi sfery podrostkov [Features of the development of the semantic sphere of adolescents]. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky: Izd-vo Kamchatskogo gos. un-ta im. Vitusa Beringa, 2007, 189.
9. Erikson E. Identichnostʹ: iunostʹ i krizis [Identity: youth and crisis]. Moscow: Flinta: MPSI: Progress, 2006, 352.
10. Praktikum po psikhologii zhiznennykh situatsii [Practicum on psychology of life situations]. Ed. Korzhova E. Iu. Saint-Petersburg: Stiks, 2016, 266.
11. Yanitskiy M. S., Seryy A. V. Razvitiesistemytsennostno-smyslovykhorientatsiilichnostivprofessionalʹnoi deiatelʹnosti spetsialistov deontologicheskogo statusa [Development of the system of value-semantic orientations of the individual in the professional activity of specialists of deontological status]. Lichnostʹ i professionalʹnaia deiatelʹnostʹ [Personality and professional activity]. Eds. Dikaia L. G., Nevstrueva T. Kh. Khabarovsk: Izd-vo DVGUPS, vol. 1 (2008): 147–159.
12. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of personality. Cervone D., Shoda Y. (eds.). Te coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization. N. Y.: Guilford Press, 1999, 185–241.
13. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 52 (2001): 141–166.
14. Frankl V. Chelovek v poiskakh smysla [Person in search of meaning]. Moscow: Progress, 1990, 368.
15. Abulʹkhanova-Slavskaia K. A. Strategiia zhizni [Strategy of life]. Moscow: Myslʹ, 1991, 159.
16. Alekseeva L. V. Psikhologiia sub"ekta i sub"ekta prestupleniia [Psychology of the Agent and the Agent of Crime]. Tyumen: Izd-vo Tiumenskogo gos. un-ta, 2004, 520.
17. Brushlinskii A. V. Sub"ektno-deiatelʹnostnaia kontseptsiia i teoriia funktsionalʹnykh sistem [Subjectactivity conception and theory of functional systems]. Voprosy psikhologii = Questions of psychology, no. 5 (1999): 110–121.
18. Lichnostnyi potentsial: struktura i diagnostika [Personality potential: structure and diagnosis]. Ed. Leontʹev D. A. Moscow: Smysl, 2011, 680.
19. Osnitsky A. K. Problemy issledovaniia sub”ektnoi aktivnosti [Problems of investigation of subject activity]. Voprosy psikhologii = Questions of psychology, no. 1 (1996): 5–19.
20. Petrovskii V. A. Lichnostʹ v psikhologii: paradigma sub”ektnosti [Personality in psychology: subjectivity paradigm]. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks, 2006, 512.
21. Yanitskiy M. S., Seryy A. V. Osnovnye metodologicheskie podkhody k izucheniiu tsennostno-smyslovoi sfery lichnosti [The main methodological approaches to the study of value-semantic sphere of personality]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kulʹtury i iskusstv = Bulletin of Kemerovo State University of Culture and Arts, no. 19-1 (2012): 82–97.
22. Shchukina M. A. Oprosnik «Urovenʹ razvitiia sub”ektnosti lichnosti (URSL) [Questionnaire "Personal agency development level"]. Tyumen: Izd-vo Tiumenskogo gos. un-ta, 2005, 45.
23. Leontiev D. A. Lichnostnoe izmerenie chelovecheskogo razvitiia [The personality dimension of human development]. Voprosy psikhologii = Questions of psychology, no. 3 (2013): 67–80.
24. Bazhin E. F., Golynkina E. A., Etkind A. M. Metod issledovaniia urovnia sub”ektivnogo kontrolia [Method of investigation of subjective control level]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 5, no. 3 (1984): 152–162.
25. Leontʹev D. A. Test smyslozhiznennykh orientatsii (SZHO) [Test of meaning-oriented orientations]. Moscow: Smysl, 1992, 16.
26. Karandashev V. N. Metodika Shvartsa dlia izucheniia tsennostei lichnosti: kontseptsiia i metodicheskoe rukovodstvo [Schwarz methodology for studying values of personality: methodological guidelines]. SaintPetersburg: Rechʹ, 2004, 70.
27. Senin I. G. Oprosnik terminalʹnykh tsennostei (OTeTS) [Terminal values questionnaire]. Yaroslavl: Psikhodiagnostika; Sodeistvie, 1991, 20.
28. Fetiskin N. P., Kozlov V. V., Manuilov G. M. Sotsialʹno-psikhologicheskaia diagnostika razvitiia lichnosti i malykh grupp [Social and psychological diagnostics of development of personality and small groups]. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Psikhoterapii, 2002, 362.
29. Dergacheva O. E., Dorfman L. Ya., Leontiev D. A. Russkoiazychnaia adaptatsiia oprosnika kauzalʹnykh orientatsii [Russian adaptation of the general causality orientation scale]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 14: Psikhologiia = Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14: Psychology, no. 3 (2008): 91–106.
30. Kotlyakov V. Yu. Metodika «Sistema zhiznennykh smyslov» ["The system of life senses" methodology]. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, no. 2-1 (2013): 148–153.
31. Yanitskiy M. S. Osnovnye psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy adaptatsii studentov na pervom i vtorom kursakh obucheniia v vuze [Main psychological mechanisms of adaptation of first and second-year university students]. Voprosy obshchei i differentsialʹnoi psikhologii [Questions of general and differential psychology]. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 1997, 60–69.
32. Yanitskiy M. S., Seryy A. V., Prokonich O. A. Osobennosti vremennoi perspektivy lichnosti predstavitelei razlichnykh tsennostnykh tipov massovogo soznaniia [Peculiarities of personality time perspective in representatives of different types of mass consciousness]. Vestnik KRAUNTS. Gumanitarnye nauki = Journal Collection of scientific works of KRASEC. Section "The Humanities", no. 2 (2012): 175–180.
33. Seryy A. V. Osmyslennoe otnoshenie k professionalʹnoi deiatelʹnosti kak uslovie razvitiia professionalʹno znachimykh kachestv psikhologov-praktikov [Analytical attitude to professional activity as a condition of professionally significant qualities development in practicing psychologists]. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, no. 2 (2005): 158–162.
Review
For citations:
Frizen M.A., Kostenko L.O. Axiological Sphere in Adolescents with Different Levels of Agency Formation. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2018;(3):140-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2018-3-140-152
Views:
704
Email this article 