NAIVE SEMANTIZATION AND LEXICOGRAPHY OF MONGOLIAN BIONYMS: THE CASE OF "HARE" BIONYM
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2018-2-141-147
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the theory of naive linguistics and the principles of its research. The material of the research is the results of psycholinguistic experiment. The results show ordinary representations of native speakers of Mongolian language. The words denoting flora and fauna (bionyms) were used as the stimuli for the experiment. The responses in the experiment have revealed a specific character of word functioning in the language consciousness of Mongolian native speakers. To describe a naive view on a word meaning, the respondents used associations in the form of spontaneous definitions and citations that include the word stimulus as well as comparisons it inspired. The research has made it possible to reconstruct a fragment of the ethnical language world view as a component of the language consciousness of Mongolian native speakers. In the conclusion the author gives a description of these bionyms, compiled on the basis of lexicographic processing of reactions and within the framework of the naive linguistics theory.
About the Author
G. BattulgaRussian Federation
2, Pirogova St., Novosibirsk, Russia, 630090
References
1. Sokolova N. Iu. Lingvokul’turologicheskie osnovy funktsionirovaniia nominatsii voprosa i otveta v angliiskom iazyke. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [Linguistic and cultural basis of functioning of nominations of the question and answer in English. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss.]. Saint-Petersburg State Univ. Saint-Petersburg, 2016, 193.
2. Kashkin V. B. Bytovaia filosofiia iazyka i iazykovye kontrasty [Household language philosophy and language contrasts]. Teoreticheskaia i prikladnaia lingvistika [Theoretical and applied linguistics]. Voronezh, iss. 3 (2002): 3–34.
3. Rostova A. N. Narodnaia filosofiia iazyka [Folk philosophy of language]. Etnogermenevtika i iazykovaia kartina mira [Ethnogermeneutics and the language picture of the world]. Kemerovo: Kemerovskii gos. un-t, 1998, 79–80.
4. Golev N. D., Kim S. V., Stevanovich S. V. «Raznoiazychnyi slovar’ obydennoi semantiki bionimov» kak istochnik sopostavitel’nykh issledovanii naivnoi kartiny mira nositelei razlichnykh iazykov [Multilingual dictionary of everyday semantics bionyms as a source of comparative studies of naive picture of the world of speakers of different languages]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaia kommunikatsiia = Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 13, no. 2 (2015): 29–35.
5. Debrenn M. Frantsuzskii iazyk v rechevoi praktike russkikh. Mezh”iazykovaia deviatologiia [The French language in speech Russian. Interlingual deviatology]. Novosibirsk: Novosibirskii gos. un-t, 2006, 385.
6. Shkuropatskaia M. G., Davaa U. Natsional’naia iazykovaia kartina mira kak komponent iazykovogo soznaniia russkoi i mongolʹskoi iazykovoi lichnosti (sopostavitel’nyi aspekt) [National language picture of the world as a component of language consciousness of Russian and Mongolian language personality]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiia = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philology, no. 1 (2016): 80–95.
7. Ortega y Gasset J. Chto takoe filosofiia? [What is philosophy?]. Moscow: Nauka, 1991, 411.
8. Vygotskii L. S. Psikhologiia razvitiia cheloveka [The psychology of human development]. Moscow: Smysl; Eksmo, 2006, 1136.
9. Polinichenko D. Iu. Lingvistika i folk-lingvistika: kontseptsiia A. N. Dragunkina [Linguistics and folk-linguistics: the concept of A. N. Dragunkin]. Obydennoe metaiazykovoe soznanie: ontologicheskie i gnoseologicheskie aspekty [Ordinary metalanguage consciousness: ontological and epistemological aspects]. Kemerovo: Kemerovskii gos. un‑t, vol. III (2010): 384–394.
10. Kashkin V. B. Konstanty obydennogo i nauchnogo znaniia o iazyke [The constants of ordinary and scientific knowledge about language]. Obydennoe metaiazykovoe soznanie: ontologicheskie i gnoseologicheskie aspekty [Ordinary metalanguage consciousness: ontological and epistemological aspects]. Kemerovo: Kemerovskii gos. un‑t, vol. IV (2012): 422–427.
11. Kashkin V. B. Obydennaia filosofiia iazyka, naivnaia lingvistika i naivnaia lingvisticheskaia tekhnologiia [Everyday philosophy, linguistics and naive naive linguistic technology]. Obydennoe metaiazykovoe soznanie: ontologicheskie i gnoseologicheskie aspekty [Ordinary metalanguage consciousness: ontological and epistemological aspects]. Kemerovo-Barnaul, vol. I (2009): 41–60.
12. Shor R. O. Iazyk i obshchestvo [Language and society]. Moscow: Librokom, 2010, 160.
13. Leontʹev A. A. Obshchie svedeniia ob assotsiatsiiakh i assotsiativnykh normakh [General information about associations and Association rules]. Slovar’ assotsiativnykh norm russkogo iazyka [Dictionary of associative norms of the Russian language]. Ed. Leontʹev A. A. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1977, 5–16.
14. Butakova L. O. Znachenie kak dostoianie individa (eksperimental’noe issledovanie) [Value as a property of the individual experimental study]. Obydennoe metaiazykovoe soznanie: ontologicheskie i gnoseologicheskie aspekty [Ordinary metalanguage consciousness: ontological and epistemological aspects]. Kemerovo: Kemerovskii gos. un‑t, vol. IV (2012): 11–35.
15. Cherkasova G. A. Kvantitativnye issledovaniia assotsiativnykh slovarei [Quantitative studies of associative dictionaries]. Iazykovaia lichnost’: tekst, slovar’, obraz mira [Language personality: text, vocabulary, image of the world]. Moscow: Izd-vo RUDN, 2006, 129–134.
16. Golev N. D., Debrenn M. Raznoiazychnyi sopostavitel’nyi slovar’ obydennoi semantiki bionimov: kontseptsiia, leksikograficheskii proekt i opyt ego realizatsii [A multilingual comparative dictionary of ordinary semantics of bionym: the concept, lexicographic project and the experience of its implementation]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaia kommunikatsiia = Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 11, no. 2 (2013): 80–91.
Review
For citations:
Battulga G. NAIVE SEMANTIZATION AND LEXICOGRAPHY OF MONGOLIAN BIONYMS: THE CASE OF "HARE" BIONYM. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2018;(2):141-147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2018-2-141-147