IDENTITY AS A DYNAMIC HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM: SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXT OF FORMATION

In accordance with the methodology of the constructivist approach, the personal identity manifested as a unique self-image is regarded  as a dynamic hierarchical system. Under the approach based on M.  Kuhn and T. McPartland’s test, we have developed and put into  practice a special questionnaire, which allows ranking 16 categories  in terms of their importance. These categories reflect social role  components of identity in the main spheres of life, thus presenting  an individual or a group identity structure as an orderly hierarchy.  Based on a sample of 1251 students of various sex, age, nationality, confession, residence and field of study, we have proved  that affiliation to a certain social or cultural group influences the  hierarchy of identity components. The study has shown that gender  and professional affiliation are of highest impact on the significance of identity components, as well as, albeit less  substantial, belonging to a particular ethnoreligious group and being  the resident of a certain region. Sociocultural affiliation in all  instances was an important differentiating characteristic, which  determined the disparities in significance of the respective basis of  the identity in the hierarchy. At the  same time, sociocultural  affiliation in most cases had an effect on the importance of less than  a half of the other identity components, thus determining the  general structure of the identity. In conclusion, gender, educational  and professional, ethnic, confessional or regional sociocultural group  is a significant social determinant of personal development in the  formation of the self-image hierarchy, which underlies the characteristics and structure of one’s identity.

1. Erikson E. E. Identichnost': iunost' i krizis [Identity: youth and crisis]. Moscow: Progress, 1996, 344.

2. Tajfel H., Turner J. C. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson Hall, 1986, 7–24.

3. Brown R. J., Hinkle S., Ely P. G., Fox-Cardamone L., Maras P., Taylor L. A. Recognising Group Diversity Individualist Collectivist and Autonomous Relational Social Orientations and their Implications for Intergroup Processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 318 (1992): 327–342.

4. Razlogov K. E. Metamorfozy identichnosti [Transformations of Identity]. Voprosy filosofii = Philosophy Questions, no. 7 (2015): 28–40.

5. Oyserman D., Destin M., Novin S. The context-sensitive future self: possible selves motivate in context, not otherwise. Self and identity, 14, no. 2 (2014): 173–188.

6. Jaspal R., Cinnirella M. The construction of ethnic identity: Insights from identity process theory. Ethnicities, 12, no. 5 (2012): 503–530.

7. Muravyeva O. I., Litvina S. A., Bogomaz S. A. Sredovaia identichnost': soderzhanie poniatiia [Environmental identity: the concept content]. Sibirskii psihologicheskii zhurnal = Siberian Journal of Psychology, no. 58 (2015): 136–148.

8. Belinskaya E. P. Izmenchivost' Ia: krizis identichnosti ili krizis znaniia o nei? [The variability of self: an identity crisis or a crisis of knowledge about it?]. Psikhologicheskie issledovania = Psychological Stadies, 8, no. 40 (2015): 12.

9. Stefanenko T. G. Izuchenie identifikatsionnykh protsessov v psikhologii i smezhnykh naukakh [Studying of identification processes in psychology and interdisciplinary sciences]. Transformatsiia identifikatsionnykh struktur v sovremennoi Rossii [Transformation of identification structures in modern Russia]. Moscow: Moskovskii obshchestvennyi nauchnyi fond, 2001, 11–29.

10. Martsinkovskaya T. D. Metodologiia sovremennoi psikhologii: smena paradigm?! [Methodology of modern psychology: a change of paradigms?!]. Psikhologicheskie issledovanka = Psychological Stadies, 7, no. 36 (2014): 1.

11. Seryy A. V., Yanitskiy M. S. Smyslovye aspekty perezhivaniia krizisa sotsial'noi identichnosti pri vynuzhdennoi smene zhiznennoi situatsii [Semantic aspects of the experience of the social identitys crisis in the forced change of life situation]. Psikhologicheskie issledovanka = Psychological Stadies, 8, no. 43 (2015): 12.

12. Mazurkevich A. V., Yanitskiy M. S., Seryy A. V. Temporal'nye aspekty transformatsii tsennostnoi struktury samoidentichnosti v usloviiah kardinal'nykh izmenenii zhiznennoi situatsii [Temporal aspectsof transformation selfidentity value structure in conditions of radical changes in life situations]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Вulletin, no. 3 (2017): 104–122.

13. Yanitskiy M. S., Seryy A. V., Braun O. A. Osobennosti ierarkhii sostavliaiushchikh obraza Ia v zavisimosti ot prinadlezhnosti k etnicheskomu bol'shinstvu libo men'shinstvu [Hierarchy of components of Self-image due to belonging to national minority or majority]. Lurievskii podkhod v mirovoi psikhologicheskoi nauke [Luria approach in world psychological science]. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2017, 154–155.

14. Korolenko C. P., Dmitrieva N. V., Zagoruiko E. N. Identichnost'. Razvitie. Perenasyshchennost'. Begstvo [Identity. Development. Oversaturation. Flight]. Novosibirsk: Izdatel'stvo NGPU, 2007, 472.

15. Dmitrieva N. V., Samojlik N. A. Krizis identichnosti: fenomenologiia perezhivaniia [Crisis of identity: experience phenomenology]. Novosibirsk: Izdatel'stvo NGPU, 2013, 233.

16. Braun O. A., Arkuzin M. G. Dinamika sistemy identichnosti lichnosti studentov-psikhologov [Dynamics of the system of identity of the identity of students- psychologists]. Kompleksnye issledovaniia cheloveka: psihologiia: materialy VII sibirskogo psihologicheskogo foruma [Complex researches of the person: psychology: materials VII of the Siberian psychological forum]. Tomsk: Tomskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, part 1 (2017): 30–33.

17. Rumyantseva T. V. Psikhologicheskoe konsul'tirovanie: diagnostika otnoshenii v pare [Psychological consultation: diagnostics of the relations in couple]. Saint-Petersburg: Rech', 2006, 176.