Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

EKPHRASIS AND ITS FUNCTIONING IN THE NOVEL "POINT COUNTER POINT" BY ALDOUS HUXLEY

https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2018-1-184-192

Abstract

The current article features the phenomenon of ekphrasis in the novel "Point Counter Point" by Aldous Huxley. The ekphrastic text consists of two conspicuous parts, the central and the peripheral ones. Various aspects of ekphrasis are subjected to analysis. The aesthetic component of the ekphrastic text reveals itself in the description of the picture painted by the main hero as a genuine work of art with great aesthetic value. The semiotic component manifests itself in the phenomenon of semiotic transference: the iconic signs of painting are translated into the verbal signs of a work of literature. The ekphrastic text, the signifier, points at the signified, i.e. the painting, described in the novel. The archetypal component reveals itself in the specific features of the description of the painting, as represented both in an ekphrastic dialogue and a monologue. These invariable features refer the reader to the archetypal scheme of such a description, elaborated in the ancient Greek classic literature. The linguistic component reveals itself in the perceptive vocabulary of the ekphrastic description that encourages the reader-beholder to marvel at the image and evokes a sense of beauty. The hermeneutic aspect reveals itself not only in the interpretation of the painting but also in the interpretation of the meaning of art itself, which is timeless and opposite to the mundane. The article also considers the following functions of ekphrasis: an aesthetically-appreciative, a semiotic, an archetypal, an emotionally-expressive, a character-drawing, and a hermeneutic function.

About the Author

T. P. Karpukhina
Pacific National State University, Pedagogical Institute
Russian Federation


References

1. Hajnády Z. Zhivopisanie slovom. O poeticheskoi funktsii vizual'nogo izobrazheniia v tvorchestve L. Tolstogo [Depiction with the Word. About the Poetic Function of a Visual Representation in the Creations of L. Tolstoy]. Voprosy Literatury = Questions of literature, no. 6 (2010): 359–377.

2. Griakalova N. Yu. Vizual'nyi obraz i smysl: Zametki o chekhovskikh ekfrasisakh (k iubileiu A. P. Chekhova) [Visual Image and Meaning: Notes on Chekhov’s Ekphrases (for A. P. Chekhov’s Anniversary)]. Russkaia Literatura = Russian literature, no. 6 (2010): 3–14.

3. Frank S. Zarazhenie strastiami kak tekstovaia nagliadnost': pathos i ekphrasis u Gogolia [Passion Contamination as Textual Ostensiveness: Pathos and Ekphrasis from Gogol]. Ekfrasis v russkoi literature. Trudy Lozannskogo simpoziuma [Ekphrasis in Russian Literature: papers of the Lozannsk symposium]. Ed. Geller L. Moscow: MIK, 2002, 32–42.

4. Urtmintseva M. G. Ekfrasis: nauchnaia problema i metodika ee issledovaniia [Ekphrasis: the scientific problem and the methodology of its investigation]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo = Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N. I. Lobachevsky, no. 4 (2010): 975–977.

5. Krivonos V. Sh. Mertvye dushi Gogolia: izobrazhennyi chelovek [Dead Souls by Gogol: the Man Depicted]. Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka = Izvestiya of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Series of literature and language, no. 1 (2012): 24–31.

6. Nike M. Tipologiia ekfrasisa v «Zhizni Klima Samgina» M. Gor'kogo [Typology of Ekphrasis in "The Life of Klim Samgin" by M. Gorki]. Ekfrasis v russkoi literature. Trudy Lozannskogo simpoziuma [Ekphrasis in Russian Literature: papers of the Lozannsk symposium]. Ed. Geller L. Moscow: MIK, 2002, 123–135.

7. Khaninova R. M. Son-ekfraza i «ozhivshii» ekfrasis v proze A. K. Tolstogo 1910–1920-kh godov [Dream-Ekphrase and "Resurgent" Ekphrasis in the Prose by A. K. Tolstoy of 1910–1920]. Izvestiia Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriia «Filologicheskie nauki» = Izvestiia of Volgograd State Pedagogical University. The series "Philological Science", no. 10 (2008): 150–156.

8. Poddubtsev R. A. Ekfrasis u Andreia Platonova: Poetika vizual'nosti [Ekphrasis in Andrey Platonov’s oeuvre: Poetics of the Visual]. Voprosy Literatury = Questions of literature, no. 5 (2011): 173–196.

9. Morozova N. G. Ekfrasis v proze russkogo romantizma. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [Ekphrasis in the Prose of Russian Romanticism. Cand. philol. Sci. Diss.]. Novosibirsk: NGPU, 2006, 210.

10. Karpukhina T. P. Ekfrasis i ego funktsionirovanie v romane Somerseta Moema «The Moon and Sixpence» («Luna i grosh») [Ekphrasis and its functioning in the novel «The Moon and Sixpence»by Somerset Maugham]. Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University, no. 2 (2017): 200–205. DOI: 10.21603/2078-8975-2017-2-200-205.

11. Vasiliev S. A. Pushkinskaia «Madona» [Pushkin’s «Madonna»]. Russkaia Rech = Russian speech, no. 5 (2013): 3–7.

12. Rubens M. Ekfrasis v rannem tvorchestve Georgiia Ivanova [Ekphrasis in the Early Works by Georgiy Ivanov]. Russkaia Literatura = Russian literature, no. 3 (2003): 68–85.

13. Khadynskaia A. A. Ekfrasis kak sposob voploshcheniia pastoral'nosti v rannei lirike Georgiia Ivanova. Avtoref. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [Ekphrasis as a Technique of the Embodiment of the Pastoral in the Early Poetry by Georgiy Ivanov. Cand. philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Tyumen, 2004, 22.

14. Lann J.-K. O raznykh aspektakh ekfrasisa u Velimira Khlebnikova [About the Different Aspects of Ekphrasis from Velimir Khlebnikov]. Ekfrasis v russkoi literature. Trudy Lozannskogo simpoziuma [Ekphrasis in Russian Literature: papers of the Lozannsk symposium]. Ed. Geller L. Moscow: MIK, 2002, 71–87.

15. Mnikh R. Sakral'naia simvolika v situatsii ekfrasisa (stikhotvorenie Anny Akhmatovoi «Tsarskosel'skaia statuia») [Sacral Notation in the Situation of Ekphrasis (the Poem by Anna Akhmatova "Tzarist-Countrified Statue")]. Ekfrasis v russkoi literature. Trudy Lozannskogo simpoziuma [Ekphrasis in Russian Literature: papers of the Lozannsk symposium]. Ed. Geller L. Moscow: MIK, 2002, 87–97.

16. Rubins M. Crossroad of Arts, Crossroad of Cultures: Ecphrasis in Russian and French Poetry. N.-Y.: Palgrave, 2000, 302.

17. Karpukhina T. P. Ekfrasticheskoe prochtenie stikhotvoreniia Teda Kh'iuza «Portraits» [The ekphatic reading of Ted Hughes' poem Portraits]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Tomsk State Pedagogical University, no. 10 (2014): 16–23.

18. Braginskaia N. V. Ekfrasis kak tip teksta (k probleme strukturnoi klassifikatsii) [Ekphrasis as a type of text (to the problem of structural classification)]. Slavianskoe i balkanskoe iazykoznanie. Karpato-vostochnoslavianskie paralleli. Struktura balkanskogo teksta [Slavic and Balkan linguistics. Carpathian-East Slavic parallels. Structure of the Balkan text]. Moscow: Nauka, 1977, 259–283.

19. Braginskaia N. V. «Kartiny» Filostrata Starshego: genezis i struktura dialoga pered izobrazheniem [«Pictures» of Philostratus the Elder: the genesis and structure of the dialogue before the image]. Odissei. Chelovek v istorii 1994. Kartina mira v narodnom i uchenom soznanii [Odysseus. Man in the history of 1994. The picture of the world in the popular and scientific consciousness]. Moscow: Nauka, 1994, 274–313.

20. Geller L. Voskreshenie poniatiia, ili Slovo ob ekfrasise [Evocation of the Notion or the Message of Ekphrasis]. Ekfrasis v russkoi literature. Trudy Lozannskogo simpoziuma [Ekphrasis in Russian Literature: papers of the Lozannsk symposium]. Ed. Geller L. Moscow: MIK, 2002, 5–23.

21. Huxley A. Point Counter Point. Leningrad: Vintage Books, 2004, 569.

22. Krivoruchko A. Yu. Funktsii ekfrasisa v russkoi proze 1920-kh godov. Avtoref. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [The Functions of Ehkfrasis in Russian Prose of the 1920-s. Cand. philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Tver': TGU, 2009, 18.

23. Iatsenko E. V. «Liubite zhivopis', poety…». Ekfrasis kak khudozhestvenno-mirovozzrencheskaia model' [«Love painting, poets...». Ekkfrasis as an artistic-ideological model]. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of philosophy, no. 11 (2011): 47–57.

24. Uspenskiy B. A. Poetika kompozitsii [Poetics of Composition]. Saint-Petersburg: Azbuka, 2000, 352.

25. Karpukhina T. P. Morfemnyi povtor v khudozhestvennom tekste v svete obshcheesteticheskoi teorii igry [Morphemic Recurrence in the Literary Text in the View of the General Esthetic Game Theory]. Khabarovsk: DVGGU, 2006, 392.

26. Tret'iakov E. N. Ekfrasis kak matrichnaia reprezentatsiia obraznykh znakov. Avtoref. diss. kand. filol. nauk [Ecphrasis as a matrix representation of figurative signs. Cand. philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Tver', 2009, 19

27. Vishnyakova E. P. Kategoriia pertseptivnosti kak osnova iazykovogo modelirovaniia vozmozhnykh mirov v novelle G. Uellsa «The Country of the Blind». Avtoref. diss. kand. filol. nauk [The category of perceptivity as the basis for the language modeling of possible worlds in the novel by H. Wells "The Country of the Blind". Cand. philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Khabarovsk: TGU, 2015, 24.

28. Vishniakova E. P., Karpukhina T. P. Funktsionirovanie kategorii pertseptivnosti v novelle G. Uellsa «Strana slepykh» [The functioning of the category of perceptivity in the novel by Wells «The Country of the Blind»]. Vestnik Tikhookeanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Pacific State University, no. 2 (2013): 241–250.

29. Varlamenko I. G. Sub"ektno-ob"ektnye otnosheniia v angliiskikh frazeologizmakh s pertseptivnym komponentom vkusa [Subject-object relations in English phraseological units with a perceptual taste component]. Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University, no. 2 (2017): 179–183. DOI: 10.21603 / 2078-8975-2017-2-179-183.

30. Karpukhina T. P. Esteticheskii aspekt vzaimodeistviia morfemnogo povtora i sintaksicheskogo parallelizma v angliiskoi khudozhestvennoi proze [The Aesthetic Aspect of Interplay of Morphemic Recurrence and Syntactic Parallelism in English Narrative Literature]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Tomsk State Pedagogical University, no. 2 (2013): 216–222.

31. Karpukhina T. P. Vzaimodeistvie morfemnogo povtora i sintaksicheskogo parallelizma v angloiazychnoi khudozhestvennoi proze [Interplay of Morphemic Recurrence and Syntactic Parallelism in English Narrative Literature]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaia kommunikatsiia = Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and intercultural communication, no. 2 (2013): 36–41.


Review

For citations:


Karpukhina T.P. EKPHRASIS AND ITS FUNCTIONING IN THE NOVEL "POINT COUNTER POINT" BY ALDOUS HUXLEY. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2018;(1):184-192. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2018-1-184-192

Views: 706


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)