REPRESENTATION OF THE MORPHEMIC COMPOSITION OF THE VERBAL WORD FOR LINGUODIDACTIC PURPOSES
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2018-1-168-177
Abstract
The article deals with a number of issues related to the morphology of the Russian verb. The research was performed according to the "objective grammar" of the Russian language in the framework of the Functional-Communicative Grammar (M.V. Vsevolodova's School). The aim of the study is to correlate the morphemic composition of the Russian verb and the meaning of "perfective aspect" vs. ‘imperfective aspect" forms of the verb, to distinguish the actual correlation of the aspects and the phenomenon of the methods of verbal action (the so-called characterized verbs). The author proceeds from the premise that a clear understanding of the aspect will improve the method of cross-lingual matching as well as make Russian classes more effective for non-Slavic speakers. The factors of linguistic relativity, their content and means of expression, predetermine a need for a comparative analysis of the lexical-grammatical category of the verbal form embracing the methods of verbal action as a means of expressing the category of verbal aspect and the possibilities of expressing similar meanings in Chinese. The functional-communicative approach allows for a linguodidactic description, relevant for the entire language system (objective grammar); a comparative approach will remove many of the linguistic barriers of a foreign student whose mother tongue is an analytic language.
About the Author
I. I. Akimova
Military Institute (Engineering and Technical) of the General A. V. Khrulev Military Academy of Material and Technical Support
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Shmelev A. D. Russkii iazyk i vneiazykovaia deistvitel'nost' [Russian language and extralinguistic reality]. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul'tury, 2002, 496.
2. Petrukhina E. V. Aspektual'nye kategorii glagola v russkom iazyke v sopostavlenii s cheshskim, slovatskim, pol'skim i bolgarskim iazykami [The aspect category of the verb in the Russian language in comparison with Czech, Slovak, Polish and Bulgarian languages]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 2000, 256.
3. Den In. Semantika i funktsii glagol'nykh form proshedshego vremeni sovershennogo i nesovershennogo vida v russkom iazyke v zerkale kitaiskogo. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [Semantics and functions of the verbal forms of the past tense perfective and imperfective aspect in the Russian language in the mirror of the Chinese. Cand. philol. Sci. Diss.]. Moscow State Univ. named after M. V. Lomonosov. Moscow, 2006, 179.
4. Fen Shisiuan'. Izuchenie russkogo iazyka kitaiskimi studentami: problemy, vozmozhnosti, perspektivy [The study of Russian language to Chinese students: problems. possibilities. perspectives]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriia: Russkii i inostrannye iazyki i metodika ikh prepodavaniia = Bulletin of the Russian University of Peoples' Friendship. Series: Russian and foreign languages and methods of teaching them, no. 2 (2015). Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/izuchenie-russkogo-yazyka-kitayskimi-studentami-problemyvozmozhnosti-perspektivy#ixzz4NEJzDHWv/ (accessed 03.03.2017).
5. Chzhan Chzhitsziun'. Sopostavitel'noe issledovanie russkogo iazyka s kitaiskim v aspekte aspektual'nosti iazyka [A comparative study of the Russian language with Chinese in the aspect of aspectualacme language]. Iazyk – kul'tura – kommunikatsiia [Language – Culture – Communication: Proc. KAPRIaL]. Khanchzhou (KNR): Izdatel'stvo Tszhetszianskogo un-ta, 2007, 106–116.
6. Zalizniak A. A., Shmelev A.D. Vvedenie v russkuiu aspektologiiu [Introduction to Russian Aspectology]. Moscow: Iazyki russkoi kul'tury, 2000, 226.
7. Kovalenko B. N. Eshche raz o spornykh voprosakh teorii vida russkogo glagola [Once again on the disputed questions of the theory of the form of the Russian verb]. Innovatsionnaia nauka = Innovative science, no. 1-3 (2016): 85–87.
8. Tipologiya vida / aspekta: problemy, poiski, resheniya. Tezisy II Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii (22– 26 sentiabria 2009) [Typology of views / aspect: problems, searches, solutions. Abstr. of the II Intern. Sc. Conf. (September 22–26 2009)]. Simferopol – Gaspra. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 2009, 108.
9. Chertkova M. Iu. Grammaticheskaia kategoriia vida v sovremennom russkom iazyke [Grammatical category of aspect in modern Russian language]. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1996, 171.
10. Shatunovskii I. B. Problemy russkogo vida [The problem of the Russian kind]. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskikh kul'tur, 2009, 352.
11. Vsevolodova M. V. Kategoriia aspektual'nosti, glagol'nyi vid i sposoby glagol'nogo deistviia. O nekotorykh nerassmotrennykh voprosakh grammatiki vida [Category aspectuality. verbal view. and ways of verbal action. About some pending issues of the grammar of the form]. V Mezhdunarodnyi kongress issledovatelei russkogo iazyka «Russkii iazyk: istoricheskie sud'by i sovremennost'»: trudy i materialy (18–21 marta 2014) [V International Congress of Russian Language Researchers "Russian Language: Historical Fates and the Present": Proceedings and Materials (March 18–21 2014)]. Moscow, 2014, 37–53.
12. Karavanov A. A. Vidy russkogo glagola: znachenie i upotreblenie [The Russian verb: meaning and use]. Moscow: Russkii iazyk. Kursy, 2008, 175.
13. Peshkovskiy A. M. Ob"ektivnaia i normativnaia tochka zreniia na iazyk [Objective and normative point of view on the language]. Russkii iazyk v shkole = Russian language at school, Iss. I (1923): 230–241.
14. Pospelov N. S. K voprosu o razlichnykh vremennykh znacheniiakh russkogo proshedshego sovershennogo. [The question of different time values of the Russian past perfect]. Doklady i soobshcheniia instituta iazykoznaniia AN SSSR [Reports and reports of the Institute of Linguistics of the USSR Academy of Sciences]. Moscow: Izdvo AN SSSR, no. 1 (1952): 61–66.
15. Pospelov N. S. O dvukh riadakh grammaticheskikh znachenii glagol'nykh form vremeni v russkom iazyke [Two ranks of grammatical meanings of the verbal forms of time in the Russian language]. Voprosy iazykoznaniia = Questions of linguistics, no. 2 (1966): 25.
16. Rassudova O. A. Upotreblenie vidov glagola v russkom iazyke [The use of the imperfective aspect in the Russian language]. Moscow: Russkii iazyk, 1982, 151.
17. Akimova I. I. Lingvisticheskie universalii kak metodologicheskaia osnova obucheniia inostrannym iazykam. Funktsional'no-semanticheskaia kategoriia imennoi temporal'nosti [Linguistic universals as a methodological basis for teaching foreign languages. Functional-semantic category of nominal temporality]. Moscow: RPA Miniusta Rossii, 2013, 170.
18. Avilova N. S. Vid glagola i semantika glagol'nogo slova [Verb type and semantics of the verb word]. Moscow: Nauka, 1976, 328.
19. Ulman L. M. Problema grammaticheskoi interferentsii. Avtoref. diss. kand. filol. nauk [The problem of grammatical interference. Cand. philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Moscow, 1964, 16.
20. Iudina L. P. O roli rodnogo iazyka pri obuchenii russkomu iazyku inostrantsev [On the role of the native language in teaching the Russian language for foreigners]. Iz opyta prepodavaniia russkogo iazyka inostrantsam [From the experience of teaching Russian to foreigners]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo MGU, 1964, 6‒20.
21. Vsevolodova M. V. Teoriia funktsional'no-kommunikativnogo sintaksisa: fragment fundamental'noi prikladnoi (pedagogicheskoi) modeli iazyka [Theory of functional-communicative syntax: a fragment of a fundamental applied (pedagogical) language model]. Moscow: URSS, 2017, 649.
22. Maslov Iu. S. Vid i leksicheskoe znachenie glagola v sovremennom russkom iazyke [The form and the lexical meaning of the verb in modern Russian language]. Izvestiia Akademii nauk SSSR. Otdelenie literatury i iazyka = Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Department of Literature and Language, VII, no. 4 (1948): 303–316.
23. Chang Pei-Chi. Leksikograficheskie problemy predstavleniia vidovoi parnosti v sovremennom russkom iazyke. Avtoref. diss. kand. filol. nauk [Lexicographical problems of representing the species. is taken into account in the modern Russian language. Cand. philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Moscow, 1999, 21.
24. Shamov A. N. Psikhologo-didakticheskie osnovy organizatsii poznavatel'noi deiatel'nosti uchashchikhsia v protsesse ovladeniia leksicheskoi storonoi inoiazychnoi rechi [Psycho-didactic bases of organization of cognitive activity of students in the process of mastering the lexical party of foreign speech.]. Nizhnii Novgorod: Izd-vo NGLU, 2003, 238.
25. Merenkova A. G. Vidovye troiki v sovremennom russkom iazyke. Diss. kand. filol. nauk [Three species in the modern Russian language. Cand. philol. Sci. Diss.]. Yelets State Univ. named after I. A. Bunin. Yelets, 2003, 267.
26. Tan' Aoshuan. Problemy skrytoi grammatiki. Sintaksis, semantika i pragmatika iazyka izoliruiushchego stroia (na primere kitaiskogo iazyka) [Problems of hidden grammar. Syntax. semantics and pragmatics of the language of the insulating system (for example Chinese)]. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul'tury, 2002, 896.
27. Khrakovskii V. S. Problemy lingvisticheskoi tipologii i struktury iazyka [Issues of linguistic typology and language structure]. Leningrad: Nauka, 1977, 192.
28. Shanskii N. M. Sopostavlenie kak odin iz metodicheskikh priemov obucheniia russkomu iazyku nerusskikh [Mapping as one of the instructional techniques of teaching Russian language for non-Russians]. Russkoe iazykoznanie i lingvodidaktika [Russian linguistics and linguodidactics]. Moscow: Russkii iazyk, 1985, 220–240.
29. Shatilov S. F. Nekotorye voprosy sopostavleniia inostrannogo i rodnogo iazykov v metodicheskikh tseliakh [Some questions of comparison of foreign and native languages in a methodical order]. Russkii iazyk za rubezhom = Russian language abroad, no. 5 (1985): 61–64.
30. Shubina O. Iu. Cemanticheskie i poniatiinye kategorii kak osnova dlia sopostavleniia razlichnykh iazykov [Semantic and conceptual categories as the basis for comparison of different languages]. Vestnik KRSU = Bulletin of KRSU, 3, no. 1 (2003). Available at: http://www.krsu.edu.kg/vestnik/2003/v1/a11.html (accessed 03.03.2017).
31. Vsevolodova M. V., Zagnitko A. A. Slavianskie iazyki: ob"ektivnaia grammatika i kategoriia grammatikalizatsii [Slavic languages: objective grammar and category of grammaticalization]. Rossiia v mirovom soobshchestve: smyslovoe prostranstvo dialoga kul'tur: materialy Mezhdunarodnogo foruma «Vostochnyi vektor migratsionnykh protsessov: dialog s russkoi kul'turoi» (16–17 noiabria 2016) [Russia in the world community: the semantic space of the dialogue of cultures: materials of the International Forum "Eastern Vector of Migration Processes: Dialogue with Russian Culture" (November 16–17 2016)]. Khabarovsk, 2016, 298–310.
32. Vsevolodova M. V. Iazyk: norma i uzus (podkhody k sisteme iazyka) [Language norm and language usage (approaches to language)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 9. Filologiia = Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 9. Philology, no. 6 (2015): 35–57.
Review
For citations:
Akimova I.I. REPRESENTATION OF THE MORPHEMIC COMPOSITION OF THE VERBAL WORD FOR LINGUODIDACTIC PURPOSES. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2018;(1):168-177. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2018-1-168-177
Views:
619
Email this article 