CRITICAL DISCOURSE OF TOTALITARIANISM IN FOREIGN HISTORIOGRAPHY OF THE 1960S
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2018-1-66-73
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze the reasons and the substantive content of the critical discourse on totalitarianism developed in foreign historiography of the 1960s. The analysis is based on the fundamental methodological principles of historical study: systemic approach of historicism and scientific objectivity. The research focuses on the works by famous foreign researchers in the area: H. Arendt, P. Sorokin, K. Friedrich, Z. Brzezinski, R. Мills, A. Ulam. The content of these works makes it possible to highlight the main methodological problems of critical discourse. The author criticizes the totalitarian model for its structural and external uniformity and lack of differentiation of totalitarian regimes. Revisionism in foreign historiography of the 1960s contributed to the study of Soviet society on the basis of sociological methodology by highlighting its high social mobility. The critical approach specifies the differences between communist and fascist systems and the peculiarities of individual communist regimes. However, the representatives of the critical approach failed to create a coherent theory compatible to the one offered by the adherents of totalitarianism. The critical discourse of totalitarianism in the 1960s contributed to the formation of a modernized concept of the phenomenon. The final part of the article contains the main conclusions of the discussion. The content and results of this article can be used in foreign historiography courses.
About the Author
E. V. Moroz
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (Kemerovo branch)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Moroz E. V. Fenomen totalitarizma v amerikanskoi istoriografii (1930–1980-e gody). Avtoref. diss. doktora ist. nauk [The phenomenon of totalitarianism in American historiography (1930–1980s years). Dr. hist. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Kemerovo, 2006, 50.
2. Karpov A. A. Sovremennyi totalitarizm i ego raznovidnosti [Modern totalitarianism and its variants]. Leningradskii iuridicheskii zhurnal = Leningrad Law Journal, no. 1 (2016): 52–58.
3. Mamedov A. A. O., Orishev A. B. Totalitarizm: traktovki proshlogo i nastoiashchego [Totalitarianism: interpretation past and present]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv = Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture and Arts, no. 2 (2014): 108–115.
4. Moroz E. V. Kriticheskoe osmyslenie totalitarizma v amerikanskoi politicheskoi mysli serediny proshlogo veka (nekotorye aspekty problemy) [Critical understanding of totalitarianism in American political thought mid-century (some aspects of)]. Etnosotsium i mezhnatsional’naia kul’tura = Ethnosociology and interethnic culture, no. 2 (2015): 104–108.
5. Moroz E. V. Totalitarizm: interpretatsii v zarubezhnykh issledovaniiakh 20–30-kh godov ХХ veka (nekotorye aspekty problemy) [Totalitarianism: the interpretation of the foreign studies of the 20–30s of XX century (some aspects of)]. Evoliutsiia rossiiskogo i zarubezhnogo gosudarstva i prava. K 80-letiiu kafedry istorii gosudarstva i prava Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo iuridicheskogo universiteta (1936–2016). Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. T. II: Evoliutsiia zarubezhnogo gosudarstva i prava, uchenii o zarubezhnom gosudarstve i prave, problemy teorii, filosofii i metodologii prava v trudakh-pozdravleniiakh kolleg [Evolution of the Russian and foreign state and law. To the 80th anniversary of the Department of the History of State and Law of the Ural State Law University (1936– 2016). Collection of scientific papers. Vol. II: Evolution of a foreign state and law, doctrines about a foreign state and law, problems of theory, philosophy and methodology of law in works-congratulations of colleagues]. Ed. Smykalin A. S. Ekaterinburg: Ural’skii gosudarstvennyi iuridicheskii universitet, 2016, 465–478.
6. Kolko J., Kolko G. The Limits of Power: The Wоrld and United States Foreign Policy, 1945–1954. New York: Harper & Row, 1972, 820.
7. Moroz E. V. Nekotorye problemy evoliutsii politicheskogo ucheniia o totalitarnom gosudarstve [Some problems of the evolution of political doctrine of the totalitarian state]. Pravo i obrazovanie = Law and Education, no. 8 (2010): 68–80.
8. Moroz E. V. Stanovlenie kontseptsii totalitarnogo gosudarstva v zarubezhnoi obshchestvenno-politicheskoi mysli 20–30 gg. ХХ veka [The formation of the concept of the totalitarian state in foreign political thinking in the 20–30 years of the twentieth century]. Sovremennyi mir. Sovremennoe obrazovanie. Problemy, tendentsii razvitiia, podkhody: materialy VI Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Kemerovo, iiun’ 2012 g. [Modern world. Modern education. Problems, development trends, approaches: Proc. VI Russian Sc.-Prac. Conf. (June 2012)]. Ed. Filippov V. M. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo sovremennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, 2012, 115–126.
9. Friedrich C. J., Brzezinski Z.K. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Revised by Friedrich C. J. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1965, 439.
10. Arendt H. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1966, 526.
11. Arendt H. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1973, 576.
12. Aron R. Demokratiia i totalitarizm [Democracy and totalitarianism]. Moscow: Tekst, 1993, 303.
13. Sorokin P. A. Mutual Convergence of the United States and the USSR to the Mixed Sociocultural Type. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, no. 1 (1960): 143–176.
14. Mills R. Vlastvuiushchaia elita [The ruling elite]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoi literatury, 1959, 544.
15. Moroz E. V. Kritika totalitarnogo gosudarstva v amerikanskoi obshchestvenno-politicheskoi mysli 60-kh godov ХХ veka [Criticism of the totalitarian state in American political thinking in the 60s of XX century]. Sotsiogumanitarnyi vestnik = Social and humanitarian bulletin, no. 1 (2011): 66–73.
16. Gleason A. Totalitarianism. The Inner History of the Cold War. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, 307.
17. Ulam A. B. The New Face of Soviet Totalitarianism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963, 233.
18. Inkeles A., Bauer R. A. The Soviet Citizen: Daily Life in a Totalitarian Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Pr., 1961, 533.
19. Spiro H. J. Totalitarianism. International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan and Free Press, vol. 16 (1968–1976): 106–107.
20. Sauer W. National Socialism: Totalitarianism or Fascism? The American Historical Review, December, LXXIII, no. 2 (1967): 404–424.
21. Skilling H. G. Interest Group and Communist Politics. World Politics, April (1966): 435–451.
22. Hough J. The «Dark Forces», the Totalitarian Model, and Soviet History. Russian Review, 46, October (1987): 397–403.
23. Slavic Review. March, XXVI, no. 1 (1967): 1–112.
24. Hollander P. Observations on Bureaucracy, Totalitarianism, and the Comparative Study of Communism. Slavic Review, June, XXVI, no. 2 (1967): 302–307.
25. Inkeles A. Models and Issues in the Analysis of Soviet Society. Survey, July (1966): 3–17.
26. Change in Communist Systems. Ed. Johnson Ch. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1970, 368.
Review
For citations:
Moroz E.V. CRITICAL DISCOURSE OF TOTALITARIANISM IN FOREIGN HISTORIOGRAPHY OF THE 1960S. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2018;(1):66-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2018-1-66-73
Views:
732
Email this article 