READER'S SKILL
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-4-219-224
Abstract
The article deals with the issues of artistic perception culture of fictional texts. The sufficiency of literary reading is derived from the aesthetic specificity of verbal art: from special status of an author's figure, from the special nature of the artistic sense, from the special text organization as a combination of the reader's impression factors. According to M. Bakhtin, literature is interpreted as the art of “indirect speaking”, where the author “puts on silence” because in fictional text we never deal with the writer's speech, it is always mediated by the figure of the talking hero or the narrator. The artistic perception of fictional texts should be studied as a reader's skill. The culture of reading is the complementarity of two differently directed vectors: it is a deep and sincere empathy, as if it were reality; on the other hand – the reader's creativity in relation to the text artfullness, which conceals the meaning of the art work. The artistic sense is actualized by the reader's consciousness as complementary to the author's consciousness manifested in the text.
About the Author
V. I. Tyupa
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valery I. Tyupa.
6, Miusscay Square, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Fukson L. Iu. Chtenie [Reading]. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2007, 266.
2. Bakhtin M. M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki [Questions of literature and aesthetics]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia literatura, 1975, 504.
3. Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1979, 424.
4. Bakhtin M. M. Sobr. soch. [Collected Works by Bakhtin M. M.]. Moscow: Russkie slovari, vol. 1 (2003): 955.
5. Prishvin M. M. Sobr. soch. [Collected Works by Prishvin M. M.]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia literatura, vol. 7 (1984): 480.
6. Fukson L. Iu. Interpretatsiia fragmenta teksta kak opyt «medlennogo chteniia» [Interpretation of a fragment of the text as an experience of "slow reading"]. Sibirskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal = Siberian Pedagogical Journal, no. 3 (2015): 193–197.
7. Gadamer H.-G. Aktual'nost' prekrasnogo [The relevance of the beautiful]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1991, 368.
8. Rosenstock-Huessy E. Rech' i deistvitel'nost' [Speech and reality]. Moscow: Labirint, 1994, 210.
9. Bakhtin M. M. Sobr. soch. [Collected Works by Bakhtin M. M.]. Moscow: Russkie slovari, vol. 5 (2003): 730.
10. Anandavardkhana. Dkhvan'ialoka [Light of Dhwani]. Moscow: Nauka, 1974, 304.
11. Tolstoy L. N. O literature [About the literature]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo khudozhestvennoi literatury, 1955, 806.
12. Tyupa V. I. Analiz khudozhestvennogo teksta [Analysis of artistic text]. Moscow: Akademiia, 2006, 336.
13. Girshman M. M. Literaturnoe proizvedenie: teoriia i praktika analiza [Literary work: theory and practice of analysis]. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola, 1991, 136–155.
14. Podkovyrin Iu. V. Poniatie «inkarnatsii» v filosofii KhKh veka i fenomen smysla literaturnogo proizvedeniia [Notion of Incarnation in Philosophy of the ХХth Century and Sense Phenomenon of Literary Work]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki = Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, no. 6 (2012): 137–142.
Review
For citations:
Tyupa V.I. READER'S SKILL. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2017;(4):219-224. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-4-219-224
Views:
987
Email this article 