WHY DID MERCHANTS IN TRADITIONAL CHINA NEED AN ACADEMIC TITLE?
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-4-46-50
Abstract
The article explores the issue of participation of the traditional China merchant class in special examinations that gave the right to work in the state authorities. The author’s aim was to find the answer to the following question: why were merchants banned from the exams, whereas artisans and peasants were granted this opportunity. When they were finally given such an option, it immediately resulted in a huge wave of applicants willing to pass the difficult test, despite its great material and moral costs and the fact that there was no guarantee that the applicant could ever become a government official to become officials, even if they passed the ordeal with flying colors. The author concludes that for most of the applicants the main purpose was not the bureaucratic post itself but the degree that allowed them to enter the ranks of the privileged scholar class shênshih (绅士) and become part of the political elite of Chinese society, which gave them more opportunities to develop their trading business.
About the Author
A. V. Danshin
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (Kemerovo branch)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
DanshinAlexandr V.
39, Kuznetsky Ave., Kemerovo, 650992
References
1. Krol’ Iu. L. Nekotorye voprosy issledovaniia fenomena biurokratii v starom Kitae i perevoda sootvetstvuiushchikh administrativnykh terminov (v sviazi s vykhodom v svet monografii V. M. Rybakova «Tanskaia biurokratiia») [Some questions of study of the phenomenon of bureaucracy in ancient China and the translation of relevant administrative terms (in connection with the publication of a monograph by V. M. Rybakov «The T’ang bureaucracy»)]. Pis’mennye pamiatniki Vostoka = Written monuments of the East, no. 2 (2010): 146–168.
2. Elman B. А. A Cultural History of Civil Examinations in Late Imperial Chine. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 2000, 847.
3. Eberhard Wolfram. Social Mobility in Traditional China. Leiden, 1962, 302.
4. Kniga pravitelia oblasti Shan (Shan Tsziun’ Shu) [The book of Governor of region Shang (Shang Jun Shu)]. Trans. Perelomov L. S. Moscow: Ladomir, 1993, 392.
5. Twitchett D. C. Merchant, Trade and Government in Late T’ang. Asia Major, vol. XIV, part 1 (1968): 63–95.
6. Kracke E. A. Civil Service in Early Sung China (960–1067). Cambridge (Mass.), 1953, 249.
7. Twitchett D. C. Documents of Clan Administration: 1, The Rules of Administration of the Charitable Estate of the Fan Clan. Annotated translation of the I-chuang kuey-chu. Asia Major, vol. 8, part 1 (1960): 1–35.
8. Zakony Velikoi dinastii Min so svodnym kommentariem i prilozheniem postanovlenii (Da Min liui tszi fu li) [The laws of the Great Ming with a consolidated review and the application of regulations (Da Ming lü ji fu li)]. Transl. Svistunova N. P. Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura, part 2 (2002): 408.
9. Wu Jing-zi. Neofitsial’naia istoriia konfutsiantsev [Unofficial history of the Confucians]. Trans. Voskresensky D. Moscow: Gud’ial-press, 1999, 640.
10. Bol P. K. The Sung Examination System and the Shih. Review Article. Asia Major, vol. 3, part 2 (1990): 149–170.
11. Rysakova P. I. «Kupecheskie knigi» (shanzhen’shu) i «povsednevnye entsiklopedii» (zhiiunleishu) kak uchebnye posobiia v pozdneimperatorskom Kitae [«Merchant books» (sanganichi) and «everyday encyclopedias» (junmaishu) as manuals in late Imperial China]. Aziia i Afrika v meniaiushchemsia mire: XXVIII Mezhdunarodnaia nauchnaia konferentsiia po istochnikovedeniiu i istoriografii stran Azii i Afriki. Sankt-Peterburg (22–24 aprelia 2015) [Asia and Africa in a changing world: Proc. XXVIII intern. Sc. Conf. on source studies and historiography of Asia and Africa. Saint-Petersburg (April 22–24 2015)]. Ed. D’iakov N. N., Matveev A. S. Saint-Petersburg: NP-Print, 2015, 175–176.
12. Dan’shin A. V. Kodeksy professional’noi etiki kupechestva kak istochnik torgovogo prava traditsionnogo Kitaia [Codes of professional ethics of the merchant as the source of commercial law in traditional China]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo = Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. Right, no. 2(8) (2013):131–137.
13. Weber M. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der Sozialökonomik. Abteilung III. Tubingen, 1922, 864. Available at: http://archive.org/stream/wirtschaftundges00webeuoft#page/708/mode /2up (accessed 15.09.2016).
14. Ch´u Tung-tsu. Law and Society in Traditional China. Raris, 1961, 304.
15. Dukhovnaia kul’tura Kitaia: entsiklopediia. Vol. 4: Istoricheskaia mysl’. Politicheskaia i pravovaia kul’tura [Spiritual culture of China: encyclopedia: Vol. 4: Historical thought. The political and legal culture]. Ed. Titarenko M. L. Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura, 2009, 935.
16. Berkelhach van der Sprenkel Otto P. N. The Chinese Civil Service. East Asian History, no. 11 (1996): 17–32.
17. Troshchinskii P. V. Pravovaia sistema Kitaia [The legal system of China]. Moscow: Institut Dal’nego Vostoka Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 2016, 471.
18. Manukov S. Uroki kitaiskoi gramoty: sem’ let za shpargalku [Lessons of the Chinese literacy: seven years for the crib]. Kommersant = Kommersant, 31.05.2017. Available at: http:// spb.media/text/uroki-kitayskoy-gramoty-sem-let-za-shpargalku (accessed 10.07.2017).
Review
For citations:
Danshin A.V. WHY DID MERCHANTS IN TRADITIONAL CHINA NEED AN ACADEMIC TITLE? The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2017;(4):46-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-4-46-50
Views:
709
Email this article 