ANTICONCEPT AND CONCEPT AS STRUCTURES OF DIFFERENT CATEGORIES IN HOMEOPATHIC TERMINOLOGY
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-3-167-171
Abstract
This article features the issue of correlation of concept and anticoncept as scientific formats of knowledge, which is topical for terminological research. Recent studies in the domain of anticoncept have shown that this format of knowledge is different from that of concept by its more complex organization, exteriorization and a more detailed verbalization in terminology. As exemplified by homeopathic terms and conceptual and component analyses, the anticoncept and the concept differ at the level of different categories. The investigation of the key homeopathic notions of «constitution» and «miasm» demonstrate their belonging to different categories: the constitution of a patient is conceptualized as a property whereas the miasm (pathological constitution) is conceptualized as a process or as a state. Further terminological researches in the domain of concepts and anticoncepts as members of different categories might provide a more detailed interpretation, reveal new conceptual signs and, consequently, enlarge the scope of scientific knowledge.
About the Author
Alexander E. Buzheninov
Ural State Pedagogical University.
Russian Federation
26, Kosmonavtov Ave., Ekaterinburg, 620017.
Russian Federation
26, Kosmonavtov Ave., Ekaterinburg, 620017.
References
1. Trask R. L. Key concepts in language and linguistics. London, New-York: Taylor & Francis E-Library, 2005, 276.
2. Casasanto D. Embodiment of abstract concepts: good and bad in right- and left-henders. Journal of experimental psychology, 138, no. 3 (2009): 351–367.
3. Babina L. V. Kontseptual'naia derivatsiia i ee proiavlenie na iazykovom urovne [Conceptual derivation and it’s manifestation on the language level]. Kontseptual'noe prostranstvo iazyka [Conceptual space of language]. Tambov: Izd-vo TGU im. G. R. Derzhavina, 2005, 141–149.
4. Boeva-Omelechko N. B. Kontsept i antikontsept kak dialekticheskoe edinstvo [Concept and anticoncept as a dialectical unity]. Kognitivnye issledovaniia iazyka = Cognitive studies of language, no. 18 (2014): 39–42.
5. Gureeva E. I. Poniatiia kontsept i antikontsept (na materiale sportivnoi terminologii) [Notions concept and anticoncept (on the material of terminology of sport)]. Vestnik ChelGU = Bulletin of the Tchelyabinsk State University, no. 8 (2007): 16–20.
6. Golovanova E. I Vvedenie v kognitivnoe terminovedenie [Introduction to cognitive terminology science]. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 2011, 224.
7. Nepshekueva T. S., Gubieva S. Iu. Antikontsept «green economy» kak rezul'tat protsessa perekategorizatsii [Anticoncept “green economy” as a result of the process of transcategorisation]. Politematicheskii setevoi elektronnyi zhurnal KubGAU = Polythematic online scientific journal of Kuban State Agrarian University, no. 110 (2015): 1006–1013.
8. Novodranova V. F. Kontsepty i antikontsepty i ikh reprezentatsiia iazykovymi sredstvami [Concept and anticoncept and their representation by linguistics means]. Kontseptual'nyi analiz iazyka: sovremennye napravleniia issledovaniia [Conceptual analysis of language: modern approaches of investigations]. Moscow, Kaluga: Eidos, 2007, 148–155.
9. Sloeva E. A. Kognitivno-kommunikativnyi podkhod k opisaniiu k opisaniiu anatomicheskogo ob"ekta. Avtoref. diss. kand. filol. nauk [Conceptual and communicative approach to description to anatomical object. Cand. philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Ul'ianovsk, 2007, 182.
10. Svein D. Gomeopaticheskii metod [Homeopathic method]. Moscow: Gomeopaticheskaia meditsina, 2002, 358.
11. Simeonova N. K. Gomeopatiia [Homeopathy]. Moscow: Slava!, Rekon, Fort-Profi, 2008, 432.
12. Golovanova E. I. Kategoriia professional'nogo deiatelia: Formirovanie. Razvitie. Status v iazyke [Categoriy of professional figure: Forming. Developpement. Status]. Moscow: Izd-vo Elpis, 2008, 304.
13. Mikhailov I. V. Gomeopatiia [Homeopathy]. Moscow: AST, 2010, 239.
14. Nalimov V. V. Spontannost' soznaniia: veroiatnostnaia teoriia smyslov i smyslovaia arkhitektonika lichnosti [Consciousness spontaneity: probabilistic theory of sense and sense architectonics of personnality]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, 2011, 399.
15. Linde V. A. Teoriia miazmov Samuila Ganemana [The miasm’s theory of Samuel Hahnemann]. Saint-Petersburg: Tsentr gomeopatii, 2001, 72.
16. Krylov A. A., Pesonina S. P., Krylova G. S. Gomeopatiia dlia vrachei obshchei praktiki [Homeopathy for doctors of general practics]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter Pablishing, 1997, 416.
17. Boldyrev N. N. Iazykovye kategorii kak format znaniia [A linguistic category as a form of knowledge] Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki = Issues of cognitive linguistics, no. 2 (2006): 5–22.
18. Buzheninov A. E. Pod"iazyk gomeopatii v kategorial'nom osveshchenii (na materiale russkogo i frantsuzskogo iazykov). Avtoref. diss. kand. filol. nauk [Sublanguage of honeopathie in categorical interpretation (on the material of French and Russian languages). Cand. philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Ekaterinburg, 2013, 24.
19. Pesonina S. P., Linde A. V., Vasil'ev Iu. V. Slovar' terminov, ispol'zuemykh v gomeopatii [Dictionnary of terms used in homeopathy]. Saint-Petersburg: Tsentr gomeopatii, 2004, 36.
20. Keller G. Gomeopatiia [Homoepathy]. Smolensk: Gomeopaticheskaia meditsina, 1997, 600.
Review
For citations:
Buzheninov A.E. ANTICONCEPT AND CONCEPT AS STRUCTURES OF DIFFERENT CATEGORIES IN HOMEOPATHIC TERMINOLOGY. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2017;(3):167-171. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-3-167-171
Views:
615
Email this article 