FUTURE PLANNING PECULIARITIES UNDER DIFFERENT CONDITIONS OF UNCERTAINTY TOLERANCE IN ADOLESCENTS
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-3-143-152
Abstract
The authors of the article analyze the results of empirical research aimed at defining the specificity of future construction in senior pupils with different levels of uncertainty tolerance. The paper features the following hypothesis: future construction in the youth age in schoolchildren, both tolerant and intolerant to uncertainty, is characterized by differences in the degree of explicitation and detailed elaboration of the future, in the awareness and acceptance of personal responsibility for one's own future, in the distinct manifestation of different modality attitudes concerning one's future. The investigation was carried out with the help of a complex of methods corresponding to the stated goal which included, alongside with quantitative methods, such qualitative methods as drawing metaphor methodology «Life's journey», elements of causometric analysis, graphic method of Cottle's circles. The results of the research may be used in the organization of psychological work with pupils to form an attitude of positive acceptance of one's future, overcoming the fear connected with the future, as well as the development of reflection skills and awareness of individual responsibility for one's own future.
About the Authors
Yuliya Yu. Neyaskina
Vitus Bering Kamchatka State University.
Russian Federation
4, Pogranichnaya St., Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, 683032.
Russian Federation
4, Pogranichnaya St., Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, 683032.
Veronika O. Pronkina
Vitus Bering Kamchatka State University.
Russian Federation
4, Pogranichnaya St., Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, 683032.
Russian Federation
4, Pogranichnaya St., Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, 683032.
References
1. Anan'ev B. G. Chelovek kak predmet poznaniia [Man as the object of knowledge]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter, 2001, 288.
2. Levin K. Teoriia polia v sotsial'nykh naukakh [Field theory in social sciences]. Saint-Petersburg: Rech', 2000, 368.
3. Zimbardo F., Boid Dzh. Paradoks vremeni. Novaia psikhologiia vremeni, kotoraia uluchshit vashu zhizn'. The Paradox of Time. A new time psychology that will improve your life]. Saint-Petersburg: Rech', 2010, 352.
4. Zimbardo P. G., Boyd J. N. Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable, Individual-Differences Metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, no. 3 (1999): 1271–1288.
5. Niutten Zh. Motivatsiia, deistvie i perspektiva budushchego [Motivation, action and perspective of future]. Ed. Leontiev D. A. Moscow: Smysl, 2004, 608.
6. Mikhal'skii A. V. Psikhologiia konstruirovaniia budushchego [Psychology of designing future]. Moscow: MGPPU, 2014, 192.
7. Mikhal'skii A. V. Taimfreimy: soediniaia biologicheskoe, lichnostnoe i sotsial'noe vremia [Timeframes: combining biological, personal and social time]. Konstruirovanie budushchego v psikhologii i pedagogike: sbornik materialov konferentsii (2 dekabria 2016 g.) [Designing future in psychology and pedagogy: collection of conference materials: Proc. Conf. (December 2 2016)]. Moscow, 2016, 79–83.
8. Dotsenko E. L. Postupok kak predvoskhishchenie predstoiashchego [The act as an anticipation of the forthcoming]. Konstruirovanie budushchego v psikhologii i pedagogike: sbornik materialov konferentsii (2 dekabria 2016 g.) [The construction of future in psychology and pedagogy: collection of conference materials: Proc. Conf. (December 2 2016)]. Moscow, 2016, 48–63.
9. Mikhal'skii A. V. Psikhologiia vremeni (khronopsikhologiia) [The psychology of time (chronopsychology)]. Moscow: MPGU, 2016, 72.
10. Bozhovich L. I. Problemy formirovaniia lichnosti [Problems of the formation of personality]. 3d ed. Ed. Fel'dshteina D. I. Moscow: MPSI; Voronezh: MODEK, 2001, 349.
11. Tolstykh N. N. Khronotop: kul'tura i ontogenez: monografiia [Chronotop: culture and ontogeny]. Smolensk; Moscow: Universum, 2010, 312.
12. Erikson E. Identichnost': iunost' i krizis [Identity: youth and crisis] Psikhologiia lichnosti v trudakh zarubezhnykh psikhologov [Psychology of the individual in the writings of foreign psychologists]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter, 2000, 125.
13. Frenkel-Brunswik E. Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality, 18, no. 1 (1949): 108–143.
14. Osin E. N. Faktornaia struktura russkoiazychnoi versii shkaly obshchei tolerantnosti k neopredelennosti D. MakLeina [Factor structure of the Russian-language version of the scale of general tolerance to the uncertainty of D. McLain]. Psikhol. Diagnostika = Psychol. Diagnostic, no. 2 (2010): 65–86.
15. Matushanskaia A. G., Alishev B. S. Tolerantnost' k neopredelennosti i smezhnye psikhologicheskie konstrukty [Tolerance to uncertainty and related psychological constructs]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriia: gumanitarnye nauki = Scientific notes of Kazan University. Series: Humanities, 5, no. 153 (2001): 25–33.
16. Leont'ev D. A., Osin E. N., Lukovitskaia E. G. Diagnostika tolerantnosti k neopredelennosti. Shkaly D. Makleina [Diagnostics of tolerance to uncertainty. The scale of D. McLane]. Moscow: Smysl, 2016, 60.
17. Leont'ev D. A. Ekzistentsial'naia trevoga i kak s nei ne borot'sia [Existential anxiety and how not to fight it]. Moskovskii psikhoterapevticheskii zhurnal = Moscow Psychotherapeutic Journal, no. 2 (2003): 107–119.
18. Bad'iu A. Filosofiia i sobytie [Philosophy and event.]. Moscow: Institut obshchegumanitarnykh issledovanii, 2013, 192.
19. Sokolova E. T. Klinicheskaia psikhologiia utraty Ia [Clinical psychology of self-lost]. Moscow: Smysl, 2015, 896.
20. Leont'ev D. A. Test cmyslozhiznennykh orientatsii (SZhO) [Test of meaningful orientations (SZHO)]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Smysl, 2000, 18.
21. Syrtsova A., Sokolova E. T., Mitina O. V. Adaptatsiia oprosnika vremennoi perspektivy lichnosti F. Zimbardo [Adaptation of the questionnaire of the temporal perspective of the person F. Zimbardo]. Psikhologicheskaia nauka = Psychological Science, 3, no. 29 (2008): 101–109.
22. Belinskaia E. P., Davydova I. S. Graficheskii test Kottla: spetsifika pokazatelei vremennoi perspektivy [Cottle graphical test: specificity of the time perspective indicators]. Psikhologicheskaia nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, no. 5 (2007): 28–37.
23. Golovakha E. I., Kronik A. A. K issledovaniiu motivatsii zhiznennogo puti: tekhnika «Kauzometrii» [To the study of the life path motivation: the technique of "Causometry"]. Motivatsiia lichnosti: fenomenologiia, zakonomernosti i mekhanizmy formirovaniia [Motivation of the personality: phenomenology, regularities and mechanisms of formation]. Moscow: NII obshh. pedagogiki APN SSSR, 1982, 99–108.
Review
For citations:
Neyaskina Yu.Yu., Pronkina V.O. FUTURE PLANNING PECULIARITIES UNDER DIFFERENT CONDITIONS OF UNCERTAINTY TOLERANCE IN ADOLESCENTS. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2017;(3):143-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-3-143-152
Views:
719
Email this article 