EKPHRASIS AND ITS FUNCTIONING IN SOMERSET MAUGHAM′S NOVEL “THE MOON AND SIXPENCE”
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-2-200-205
Abstract
The article investigates the phenomenon of verbal representation of a work of fine arts in literature known under the term of ekphrasis. The object of investigation is ekphrasis as presented in the novel by S. Maugham “The Moon and Sixpence”. Specific features of ekphrasis, its functions and linguistic means of expression are subjected to analysis. The novel contains five ekphrastic inclusions – descriptions of the pictures painted by the main character: a full-length portrait, a landscape, a wall-painting, a fruit-piece, a family portrait. Being different in genre, these pictures share some common features typical of ekphrasis. The description, given in the form of a dialogue or a monologue, includes the invariable features characteristic of an archetypal scheme of ekphrasis. Linguistic manifestation of these archetypal features is connected with visual perception, with strong emotions, with the notions of beauty, miracle, mystery, singularity, spirituality, looking life-like. Ekphrastic descriptions reflect the impression the pictures have made on a certain character, his/her being either an art connoisseur or an ignoramus. Ekphrasis fulfils various functions: an aesthetically-appreciative, a descriptive, an emotionally-expressive, a character-drawing and a hermeneutic function.
About the Author
T. P. Karpukhina
Pacific National University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
136, Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, 680035
References
1. Braginskaia N. V. Ekfrasis kak tip teksta (k probleme strukturnoi klassifikatsii) [Ekphrasis as a type of the text (structural classification)]. Slavianskoe i balkanskoe iazykoznanie. Karpato-vostochnoslavianskie paralleli [Slavonic and Balkan Linguistics. Karpato-Eastern Slavonic Parallels]. Moscow: Nauka, 1977, 259 – 283.
2. Maugham S. The Moon and Sixpence. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1972, 240.
3. Dubova O. B. Mimesis i poiesis: Antichnaia kontseptsiia «podrazhaniia» i zarozhdenie evropeiskoi teorii khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva [Mimesis and poiesis: Ancient-Greek tradition of imitation and the emergence of the European theory of art]. Moscow: Pamiatniki istoricheskoi mysli, 2001, 271.
4. Milovidov V. A. Narratologiia ekfrasisa [Narratology of ekphrasis]. Narratorium, no. 1-2 (2011). Available at: http://narratorium.rggu.ru/article.html?id=2027587 (accessed 25.05.2016).
5. Uspenskii B. A. Poetika kompozitsii [Poetics of literary composition]. Saint-Petersburg: Azbuka, 2000, 352.
6. Sovremennoe zarubezhnoe literaturovedenie [Foreign contemporary study of literature. Encyclopedic reference book]. Ed. and comp. Ill’in I. P. and Tsurganova E. A. Moscow: Intrada-INION, 1996, 317.
7. Tamarchenko N. D. Sub"ekt izobrazheniia. Akt rasskazyvaniia: povestvovatel', rasskazchik, obraz avtora [The subject of portrayal. An act of storytelling: the narrator, the storyteller, the author’s image]. Vvedenie v literaturovedenie [Introduction to the study of literature]. 3nd ed. Ed. Chernets L. V. Moscow: Akademiia, 2010, 314 – 324.
8. Kris E., Kurz O. Legend, Myth, and Magic in the Image of the Artist. An Historical Experiment. New Haven, 1970.
9. Esin A. B. Printsipy i priemy analiza literaturnogo proizvedeniia [Principles and methods of analysis of a work of literature]. 10-th ed. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 2010, 248.
10. Losev A. F. Istoriia antichnoi estetiki. Sofisty. Sokrat. Platon [History of Ancient-Greek aesthetics. Sophists. Socrates. Plato]. Moscow: AST, 2000, 846.
11. Bychkov V. V. Estetika [Aesthetics]. Moscow: KNORUS, 2012, 528.
12. Estetika [Aesthetics]. Ed. Bel’aev A. A. Moscow: Politizdat, 1989, 447.
13. Shatin Iu. V. Ozhivshie kartiny: Ekfrasis i diegezis [Enlivened pictures: ekphrasis and diagesis]. Kritika i semiotika = Criticism and semiotics, no. 7 (2004): 217 – 226.
14. Karpukhina T. P. Ekfrasticheskoe prochtenie stikhotvoreniia Teda Kh'iuza “Portraits” [Ekphrasis and its interpretation in Ted Hughes’s poem “Portraits”]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, no. 10 (2014): 16 – 23.
15. Freidenberg O. M. Mif i literatura drevnosti [Myth and ancient literature]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Vost. lit. RAN, 1998, 800.
16. Iatsenko E. V. «Liubite zhivopis', poety…». Ekfrasis kak khudozhestvennomirovozzrencheskaia model' [“Do love pictures, poets…”. Ekphrasis as an artistic and a Weltanschauung model]. Voprosy filosofii = Issues of philosophy, no. 11 (2011): 47 – 57.
17. Mednis N. «Religioznyi ekfrasis» v russkoi literature [“Religious ekphrasis” in Russian literature]. Kritika i semiotika = Criticism and semiotics, no. 10 (2006): 58 – 67.
Review
For citations:
Karpukhina T.P. EKPHRASIS AND ITS FUNCTIONING IN SOMERSET MAUGHAM′S NOVEL “THE MOON AND SIXPENCE”. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2017;(2):200-205. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-2-200-205
Views:
922
Email this article 