REFORMS OF THE FINANCE SYSTEM OF CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS IN RUSSIA
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-2-34-38
Abstract
The present work analyses the reforms of cultural institutions financing system in Russia from the mid 1980s to the present time. A short review of the government’s activities is given in respect of transition from purely state financing to multichannel system of forming cultural institutions’ budgets, changing their legal nature, and developing their commercial activities. Processes of management decentralization and reallocation of financing onto budgets of various levels are considered. Special attention is paid to introduction of market mechanisms into activities of such institutions, problems connected with their application are touched as well. Both positive and negative consequences of the policy pursued by the government in matters of financing the culture at different stages of the reforms are investigated. The analysis result indicates that preservative tendencies prevail in the government’s activity in the cultural sphere, and budgetary funds still make the basis of the budget in the most part of cultural institutions, conservatism and inertness in their activities remain.
About the Author
O V. Eleskina
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
6, Krasnaya St., Kemerovo, 650000
References
1. Zinin V. G., Zaitseva L. M. Resursnyi potentsial kultury [Resource Potential of Culture]. Moscow, 1989, 64.
2. Osnovy zakonodatelstva Rossiiskoi Federatsii o kulture [“Basics of the Russian Federation Laws on Culture”]. Approved by the RF Supreme Soviet on 09.10.1992 No. 3612-1. Vedomosti Soveta narodnih deputatov I Verhovnogo Soveta Rossiiskoi Federazii = Journal of the Council of People’s Deputies and the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation, no. 46 (1992): Article 2615.
3. Sorochkin B. Iu., Rubinshtein A. Ia. Analiz mehanizmov gosudarstvennogo finansirovaniia sfery kultury [Cultural Sector State Funding Mechanisms Analysis]. Moscow: Institut ekonomiki пperehodnogo perioda, 2003, 48. Available at: http://www.iep.ru/files/text/usaid/analys_mech.pdf (accessed 10.03.2016).
4. Ob utverzhdenii polozheniia ob osnovah hoziaistvennoi deiatelnosti i finansirovaniia organizatsii kultury i iskusstva [On Approval of a Bylaw “On the Basics of Economic Activity and Funding of Culture and Arts Organizations]. RF Government Decree No. 609 dated 26.06.1995. Sobranie zakonodatelstva Rossiiskoi Federatsii = Assembly of the Russian Federation, no. 28 (1995): Article 2670.
5. Gudima T. M. Nereshonnye problemy kulturnoi politiki sovremennoi Rossii [Unsolved Problems of Cultural Policy in Present-Day Russia]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie = Knowledge. Understanding. Skills, no. 4 (2008): 29 – 34.
6. Abankina T. Prokrustovo lozhe biudzhetnoi kultury [Procrustean Bed of Budget-Funded Culture]. Otechestvennie zapiski = Homeland Sketches, no. 4(24) (2005).
7. Gnedovskii M., Zelentsova E. Kultura v Rossii: gosudarstvennyi proekt ili grazhdanskaia initsiativa? [Culture in Russia: a State Project or a Citizens’ Initiative?]. Dom kulturi: zhurnal dlia rabotnikov domov kulturi, klubov I tsentrov detskogo tborchestva = House of Culture: a magazine for employees of cultural centers, clubs and children's creativity centers, no. 6 (2006): 19 – 29.
8. Romanova V. V., Matskevich A. V. Biudzhetnye rashody v sfere kultury i kinematografii: analiz sostoianiia i dinamika [Budgetary Expenditures in the Sphere of Culture and Cinematography: Analysis of Situation and Dynamics]. Moscow: Izdatelskii dom vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2014, Iss. 2, 71.
9. Ob avtonomnyh uchrezhdeniiah [On Autonomous Institutions]. Federal Law No. 174-FZ dated 03.11.2006 (Wording dated 29.12.2015). Rossiiskaia gazeta = Russian Newspaper Federalnii vipusk, no. 4216(0) (2006, November 8).
10. Gluhova A. G. Problemy i perspektivy finansirovaniia sfery kultury v usloviiah perehoda k biudzhetirovaniiu, orientirovannomu na rezultat [Problems and Prospects of Funding the Cultural Sector Against the Backdrop of Transition to ResultOriented Budgeting]. Ekonomicheskie nauki = Economic Studies, no. 5(54) (2009): 286 – 289.
11. O vnesenii izmenenii v otdelnye zakonodatelnye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii v sviazi s sovershenstvovaniem pravovogo polozheniia gosudarstvennyh (munitsipalnyh) uchrezhdenii [On Entering Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation due to Improvement of State (Municipal) Institutions Legal Situation]. Federal Law No. 83-FZ dated 08.05.2010 (Wording dated 29.12.2015). Rossiiskaia gazeta. Federalnii vipusk = Russian Newspaper. Federal Issue, no. 5179(100) (2010, May 12).
12. Informatsionno-analiticheskii otchet o deiatelnosti gosudarstvennyh i munitsipalllnyh muzeev Kemerovskoi oblasti za 2014 god [Information and Analysis Report Concerning Activities of State and Municipal Museums in Kemerovskaya Region During the Year of 2014]. Kemerovo, 2015. Available at: http://www.kuzbasskray.ru/pictures/informacionnoanaliticheskiy_otchet_2014.pdf (accessed 10.03.2016).
13. Finansirovanie kulturnyh uchrezhdenii: rossiiane rasstavliaiut prioritety [Cultural Institutions Funding: Russians Set Priorities]. VTSIOM = The All-Russian Public Opinion Research Centre, Press Issue, no. 2331 (25.06.2013). Available at: http://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=114256 (accessed 14.02.2016).
Review
For citations:
Eleskina O.V. REFORMS OF THE FINANCE SYSTEM OF CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS IN RUSSIA. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2017;(2):34-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2017-2-34-38
Views:
716
Email this article 