KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT CONSCIOUSNESS: RESEARCHES OF IMPLICIT LEARNING
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2016-4-166-170
Abstract
The article presents a review of researches of implicit learning. This phenomenon is defined as knowledge which is mostly unconscious and difficultly verbalized but has a significant impact on cognitive activity. The aim of current analysis of scientific literature is the description of effects, the search of relevant study method. The results have shown both inconsistencies in experimental materials and lack of the conventional scientific explanation for implicit learning. The conclusion is that more relevant theory is necessary to create methods and to explain the data. The following way of study has been proposed: implicit learning should be understood as an indivisible process of an interaction between the conscious and the unconscious.
Supporting agencies: Russian Foundation for Basic Research (№ 16-06-00110) and Russian Humanitarian Science Foundation (№ 16-16-63002)
About the Author
A. P. Kryukova
Samara State Aerospace University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alyona P. Kryukova,
, 34, Moskovskoe shosse,Samara,Russia, 443086
References
1. Agafonov A. Iu. Bessoznatel’nye obertony osoznaniia [Unconsciousness obertons of consciousness]. Po obe storony soznaniia. Eksperimental’nye issledovaniia po kognitivnoi psikhologii [At both sides of consciousness. Experimental researches of cognitive psychology]. Ed. Agafonov A. Iu. Samara: Bakhrakh-M, 2012, 6 – 53.
2. Agafonov. A. Iu., Burmistrov S. N., Kozlov D. D., Shilov Iu. E. Issledovanie vliianiia obratnoi sviazi na effektivnost’ naucheniia i kognitivnoi deiatel’nosti (obzor eksperimental’nykh rezul’tatov) [Researches of feedback effects on learning Efficacy and cognitive activity (review of experimental results)]. Izvestiia Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN = News of Samara scientific centre RAS, 17, no. 1(2) (2015): 293 – 296.
3. Agafonov A. Iu., Kriukova A. P., Burmistrov S. N. Implitsitnoe nauchenie iskusstvennym grammaticam: ustanovka vs obratnaia sviaz’ [Implicit learning of artificial grammars: cognitive set vs feedback]. Izvestiia Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN = The News of Samara scientific centre RAS, 17, no. 1(3) (2015): 620 – 625.
4. Ivanchey I. I. Teorii implitsytnogo naucheniia: protivorechivye podkhody k odnomu fenomenu ili neprotivorechivye opisaniia raznykh? [Theories of implicit learning: contradictory approaches to the same phenomenon or consistent descriptions of different types of learning?]. Rossiiskii zhurnal kognitivnoi nauki = The Russian journal of cognitive science, 1(4), (2014): 4 – 30.
5. Ivanchey I. I., Moroshkina N. V. Vzaimodeistvie implitsitnykh i eksplitsitnykh znanii pri nauchenii iskusstvennym grammatikam [Interaction of implicit and explicit knowledge by learning of artificial grammars]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniia = Psychological researches, 6, no. 32 (2013): 2 – 17.
6. Ivanchey I. I., Moroshkina N. V. Izmerenie osoznannosti. Stapaia problema na novyi lad [Measure of consciousness]. Kognitivnaia psikhologiia soznaniia [Cognitive psychology of consciousness]. Ed. Allakhverdov V. M., Zashchirinskaia O. V. Saint-Petersburg: LEMA, 2011, 39 – 53.
7. Ponomarev Ia. A. Psikhologiia tvorchestva [Psychology of creativity]. Moscow: Nauka, 1976, 304.
8. Po obe storony soznaniia. Eksperimental’nye issledovaniia po kognitivnoi psikhologii [At both sides of consciousness. Experimental researches of cognitive psychology]. Ed. Agafonov A. Iu. Samara: Bakhrakh-M, 2012, 192.
9. Tikhonov R. V., Moroshkina N. V. Vliianie diadnogo vzaimodeistviia na primenenie implitsitnykh znanii [The effect of dyadic interaction on the use of implicit knowledge]. Kognitivnaia nauka v Moskve: nobye issledovaniia: Materialy konferentsii 16 iiunia 2015 g. Moskva [Cognitive science in Moscow: new researches: Proc. conf. (16 June 2015)]. Ed. Pechebkova E. V., Falikman M. V. Moscow: OOO “Buki Vedi”, IPPiP, 2015, 428 – 433.
10. Shilov Iu. E. Kognitivnye aspekty izucheniia bessoznatel’nogo v sovremennoi psikhologii [Cognitive aspects in researches of unconsciousness in contemporary psychology]. Izvestiia Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN = News of Samara scientific centre RAS, 17, no. 1(4) (2015): 907 – 912.
11. Berry D. C., Broadbent D. E. Implicit learning in the control of complex systems. Complex problem solving: The European perspective. Ed. P. A. Frensch, J. Funke. 1995.
12. Bierman D., Destrebecqz A., Cleeremans A. Intuitive decision making in complex situations: somatic markers in an artificial grammar learning task. Cognitive, affective and behavioral neuroscience, no. 5(3) (2005): 297 – 305.
13. Chan C. Implicit cognitive processes: theoretical issues and applications in computer design systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Oxford: University of Oxford, 1992.
14. Cleeremans A. Conscious and unconscious processes in cognition. In International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, vol. 4 (2001): 2584 – 2589.
15. Dienes Z., Berry D. Implicit learning: below the subjective threshold. Psychonomic bulletin & review, no. 4(1) (1997): 3 – 23.
16. Dienes Z., Scott R. Measuring unconscious knowledge: Distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge. Psychological Research, 69, no. 5-6 (2005): 338 – 351.
17. Jacoby L. L., Lindsay D. S., Toth J. P. Unconscious influences revealed. Attention, awareness and control. American Psychologist, no. 47(6) (1992): 802 – 809.
18. Lewicki P., Hill T., Sasaki I. Self-perpetuating development of encoding biases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1989, 323 – 337.
19. Neil G. J., Higham P. A. Implicit learning of conjunctive rule sets: an alternative to artificial grammars. Consciousness and Cognition, no. 21 (2012): 1393 – 1400.
20. Perruchet P., Vinter A. The Self-Organizing consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, no. 3 (2002): 297 – 388.
21. Pothos E. M. Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin, no. 133 (2007): 227 – 244.
22. Reber A. S. Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: an essay on the cognitive unconscious. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1993.
23. Reber A. S. Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, no. 6(6) (1967): 855 – 863.
24. Schacter D. Implicit memory: history and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, no. 3 (1987): 501 – 518.
25. Wierzchon M., Asanowicz D., Cleeremans A. Subjective measures of consciousness in artificial grammar learning task. Consciousness and Cognition, no. 21 (2012): 1141 – 1153.
Review
For citations:
Kryukova A.P. KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT CONSCIOUSNESS: RESEARCHES OF IMPLICIT LEARNING. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2016;(4):166-170. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2016-4-166-170
Views:
818
Email this article 