LINGUISTIC PRAGMATICS AND SPEECH ACT THEORY AS A SCIENTIFIC METHOD OF JUDICIAL LINGUISTIC EXPERTISE (from lingual expert practice)
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2016-3-155-159
Abstract
The paper reflects the progress and results of such applied linguistic research, as the conclusion of the expert-philologist (forensic linguistic) expertise, the object of which is due to the content of tasks for the specialist (expert). According to the transcript of a conversation, the features of verbal behavior of participants of the conversation that are relevant for the criminal investigation are studied. The study used lingual pragmatic analysis, techniques of text discursive analysis. The result of the semantic-pragmatic analysis of speech situations, speech acts as the units of researched conversation led to unambiguous conclusions about the nature of relations between the participants of the conversation, the communicative role of each of them, the absence of women’s guilt in the state of fear experienced by man, etc. In general, conversation analysis has shown that the achievement of linguistic pragmatics with its theory of speech acts can be successfully used in forensic linguistic examination. The results of this research can be used in the formulation of recommendations on the methodological support of forensic linguistic examination.
About the Authors
V. S. Lee
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
R. D. Karymsakova
«Turan »University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Arutiunova N. D. Rechevoi akt [Speech act]. Lingvisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar' [Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow, 1990.
2. Baranov A. N. Lingvisticheskaia ekspertiza teksta: teoreticheskie osnovaniia i praktika [Linguistic examination of the text: the theoretical bases and practice]. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 2011.
3. Brinev K. I. Sudebnaia lingvisticheskaia ekspertiza: metodologiia i metodika [Forensic linguistic expertise: methodology and technique]. Moscow: Flinta: NAUKA, 2014.
4. Golev N. D. «Geroi kapitalisticheskogo truda» - oskorbitel'no li eto zvanie? (o dvukh strategiiakh pragmaticheskogo analiza teksta kak ob"ekta iurislingvisticheskoi ekspertizy) ["Capitalist hero of labor" - an insult if that title? (Two strategies pragmatic analysis of the text as an object of examination yurislingvisticheskoy)].
5. Iurislingvistika – Yurislingvistika, no. 1 (1999).
6. Grais G. P. Logika i rechevoe obshchenie [Logic and speech communication]. Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike – New in foreign linguistics, no. XVI (1985).
7. Matveeva G. G., Lenets A. V., Petrova E. I. Osnovy pragmalingvistiki [Basics pragmalinguistics]. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 2015.
8. Radbil' T. B., Iumatov V. A. Vozmozhnosti i perspektivy primeneniia teorii rechevykh aktov v lingvisticheskoi ekspertize [Opportunities and prospects of application of the theory of speech acts in the linguistic expertise]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. N. Lobachevskogo – Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N. N. Lobachevsky, no. 1(1) (2013): 286 – 290.
9. Serl' Dzh. R. Klassifikatsiia illokutivnykh aktov [Classification of illocutionary acts]. Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike – New in foreign linguistics, no. XVII. Teoriia rechevykh aktov (1986). Moscow: Progress,
10. Sternin I. A. Vvedenie v rechevoe vozdeistvie [Introduction to speech influence]. Voronezh: Izd-vo VGU, 2001.
11. Stilisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar' russkogo iazyka [Stylistic Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Russian language]. Ed. Kozhina M. N. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 2003.
Review
For citations:
Lee V.S., Karymsakova R.D. LINGUISTIC PRAGMATICS AND SPEECH ACT THEORY AS A SCIENTIFIC METHOD OF JUDICIAL LINGUISTIC EXPERTISE (from lingual expert practice). The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2016;(3):155-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2016-3-155-159
Views:
764
Email this article 