JURISLINGUISTIC POINT OF VIEW ON LEGAL HERMENEUTICS (based on the electoral disputes)
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2016-3-136-142
Abstract
Given the potential for conflict of legal and jurislinguistic hermeneutics, the author examines in this perspective the little-studied object of electorial disputes. The author shows that it is allowed in the interpretation of the universal mechanism of discretion, which is a special legal institute, and in the field of electoral conflict it is manifested as a variant of legal hermeneutics. According to the author, discretion demonstrates the subjectivity of the officialbusiness style/judicial discourse – the property is still poorly taken into consideration in linguistics.
References
1. Apresian Iu. D. Sinonimiia mental'nykh predikatov: gruppa SCHITAT'' [Synonymy of mental predicates: SCHITAT group]. Integral'noe opisanie iazyka i sistemnaia leksikografiia. Izbrannye trudy [Integral description of language and systemic lexicography. Selected works]. Moscow: IaRK, vol. 2 (1995): 389 − 404.
2. Artamonova Iu. D., Kuznetsov V. G. Germenevticheskii aspekt iazyka SMI [The hermeneutic aspect of media language]. Iazyk SMI kak ob"ekt mezhdistsiplinarnogo issledovaniia [Media Language as an object of interdisciplinary research]. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, vol. 1 (2003): 32 − 49.
3. Bel'chikov Iu. A. Lingvisticheskaia sudebnaia ekspertiza – tselenapravlennoe germenevticheskoe issledovanie [The linguistic forensics – targeted hermeneutical study]. Spornye teksty SMI i sudebnye iski [Controversial media texts and lawsuits]. Moscow, 2005, 15 − 20.
4. Bogin G. I. Obretenie sposobnosti ponimat'. Vvedenie v filologicheskuiu germenevtiku [Gaining the ability to understand. Introduction to philological hermeneutics]. Moscow, 2001, 516.
5. Galushko I. V. Izbiratel'nye spory i sudebnaia praktika ikh razresheniia v izbiratel'nom prave Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Avtoref. kand. iurid. nauk [Electoral disputes and court practice to resolve them in the electoral law of the Russian Federation. Сand. legal. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Moscow, 2004.
6. Galiashina E. I. Razvitie sudebnykh rechevedcheskikh ekspertiz v Rossii [Development of judicial expertise rechevedcheskih in Russia]. Ekspert-kriminalist − Criminal expert, no. 4 (2010): 10 – 14.
7. Golev N. D. Teoreticheskie aspekty iuridicheskogo funktsionirovaniia estestvennogo iazyka [Theoretical aspects of the legal functioning of the natural language]. Russkii iazyk: istoricheskie sud'by i sovremennost': Materialy III Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa [Russian Language: its Historical Destiny and the Present: Proc. III Intern. Congress]. Moscow: MGU, 2007, 779 − 789.
8. Grigor'eva O. S. Vzaimoodeistvie nauchnogo i uchebnogo diskursa (na primere mental'nykh performativov) [Interaction of scientific and academic discourse (for example, mental performatives]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, 1, no. 4 (2013), 108 – 116.
9. Davydova M. L. K voprosu o stile iazyka prava [On the question of the rights of the language style]. Iurislingvistika – Yurislingvistika, no. 11 (2011): 67 − 76.
10. Kara-Murza E. S. V pomoshch' redaktoram: lingvisty ob agitatsii i informatsii [To help editors: linguists and information about the campaign]. «Obrechennye na nemotu?» SMI v period vyborov: zakony, kommentarii, rekomendatsii ["Doomed to dumbness?" The media during the election period: Laws, comments, recommendations].
11. Moscow, 2003, 119 − 152.
12. Kara-Murza E. S. Politicheskaia reklama i predvybornaia agitatsiia: vzgliad lingvista-eksperta [Political advertising and electioneering: look linguist expert]. Iurislingvistika – Yurislingvistika, no. 12 (2012): 72 − 82.
13. Kara-Murza E. S. Prikladnye zadachi diagnostiki politicheskogo diskursa: postanovka voprosa i predystoriia [Applications diagnostics political discourse: the formulation of the question and the background]. Stilistika zavtrashnego dnia [The style of tomorrow]. Moscow: Mediamir, 2012, 95 − 110.
14. Kozhemiakin E.A. Iuridicheskii diskurs kak kul'turnyi fenomen [Legal discourse as a cultural phenomenon]. Iurislingvistika – Yurislingvistika, no. 11 (2011): 131 − 145.
15. Korneev V. V. Iuridicheskaia norma i problemy applikatsii [Legal norms and application problems]. Sb. nauchn. tr. Gumanitarnye nauki [Collection of scientific works. Humanities]. Surgut: Izd-vo Surgut. un-ta. no. 6, Part 1 (2000): 122 – 127.
16. Lebedev V. Iu., Prilutskii A. M. Estetika [Aesthetics]. Moscow: Iurait, 2014.
17. Marfitsin P. G. Usmotrenie sledovatelia: Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi aspect. Avtoref. diss. doktora iurid. nauk [The discretion of the investigator: Criminal procedure aspect. Dr. legal. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Omsk, 2003, 418.
18. Merezhko A. A. Iuridicheskaia germenevtika i metodologiia prava [Legal hermeneutics and the methodology of law]. Problemi fіlosofіi prava [Problems of philosophy of law]. Kiev: IMO Kievskogo natsional'nogo universiteta im. T. Shevchenko, vol. 1 (2002): 159 − 162. Available at: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle (accessed 12.03.2016).
19. Pis'mo TsIK Rossii ot 05.06.2006 # 01-23/1572 «O presechenii nezakonnoi agitatsionnoi deiatel'nosti i iz"iatii nezakonnykh agitatsionnykh materialov» [CEC of Russia Letter dated 05.06.2006 no. 01-23/1572 "On the Suppression of unlawful campaigning activity and seizures of illegal propaganda materials"]. Available at:
20. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_71711/
21. Plavich V. P. Ot ponimaniia smysla prava k ob"iasneniiu ego sushchnosti [By understanding the meaning of the right to an explanation of its essence]. Konstitutsіino-pravovii vimіr v rozvitku pravovoї sistemi Ukraїni: materіali Mіzhnar. nauk.-prakt. konferentsії, prisviachenoї 95-rіchchiu z dnia narodzhennia dokt. iurid. nauk, prof. Strel'tsova L'va Mikhailovicha (1918 – 1979) chetvertі iuridichnі chitannia, 25 zhovtnia 2013 r., m. Odesa / M-vo osvіti і nauki Ukraїni, Odes'kii nats. un-t іm. І. І. Mechnikova [The constitutional-legal dimension in the development of the legal system of Ukraine: Proc. Intern. Sc.-prac. Conf. dedicated to the 95th anniversary of the birth of doctor. legal. PhD, Prof. Streltsov Lev Mikhailovich (1918 – 1979), the fourth legal read, October 25, 2013, Odessa M. / M-in education and science of Ukraine, Odessa NAT. UN-t im. I. I. Mechnikov]. Comp. Kuznєtsova Z. V., Levenets' A. V. Ed. Korchevnoi L. O., Strel'tsova Є. L. Odesa: Astroprint, 2013, 162 – 169.
22. Riabtseva N. K. Iazyk i estestvennyi intellect [Language and natural intelligence]. Moscow: Academia, 2005, 458 − 478.
23. Stilisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar' russkogo iazyka [Stylistic Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Russian language]. Ed. Kozhina M. N. Moscow: Flinta-Nauka, 2003.
24. Sukhoterina T.P. Iurislingvisticheskaia germenevtika [Yurislingvisticheskaya hermeneutics]. Comp. Brinev K. I., Sukhoterina T. P. Barnaul: BGPU, 6.
25. Tikhomirov Iu. A. Administrativnoe usmotrenie i pravo [Administrative discretion and the right]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava − Journal of Russian law, no. 4 (2015). Available at: http://www.lawmix.ru/comm/7004 (accessed 10.11.2012).
26. Kharitonov L. A. Germenevticheskii podkhod k tolkovaniiu pravovykh norm [The hermeneutic approach to the interpretation of legal norms]. Kriminalist"− Kriminalist, no. 1(8) (2011): 113 − 117.
27. Iambushev F. Sh. Pravovoe soznanie v mekhanizme pravovogo regulirovaniia obshchestvennykh otnoshenii. Avtoref. kand. iurid. nauk [Sense of justice in the mechanism of legal regulation of social relations. Сand. legal. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. N. Novgorod, 2002
Review
For citations:
Кara-Murza E.S. JURISLINGUISTIC POINT OF VIEW ON LEGAL HERMENEUTICS (based on the electoral disputes). The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2016;(3):136-142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2016-3-136-142
Views:
717
Email this article 