LINGUISTICS SEEKING SUBJECT
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2016-3-124-128
Abstract
The paper provides a brief overview of the evolution of one of the main lines of inquiry into how linguistics perceives its subject. Its oscillations vary from abstract language modelling to attempts to comprehend its reality, supported by a transition from purely linguistic approaches to interdisciplinary ones. A broad conception of language, characteristic in the contemporary language studies, is demonstrated by development of an anthropocentric paradigm which is a foundation for integrative ideology. The latter strives to holistic representation of language and proliferates via multiplication of intra-linguistic integrative models as well as via interdisciplinary descriptions of language. Both have to combat limitations of scientific knowledge through their merger on the basis of integrative approaches. Among these, a high potential for language reality comprehension is demonstrated by K. Wilber, his AQAL model of conscience is universal and applicable to subjects from different fields of study, including that of language.
About the Authors
L. K. Zhanalina
Kazakh National Pedagogical University named after Abai
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
L. V. Fot
Specialized lyceum “Arystan” (Kazakhstan)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Benvenist E. Obshchaia lingvistika [General linguistics]. Moscow: Progress, 1974, 445.
2. Bulygina T. V., Shmelev A. D. Iazykovaia kontseptualizatsiia mira (na materiale russkoi grammatiki) [Language conceptualization of the world (on a material of Russian grammar)]. Moscow: Iazyki russkoi kul'tury, 1997, 576.
3. Vorkachev S. G. Lingvokul'turologiia, iazykovaia lichnost', kontsept: stanovlenie antropotsentricheskoi paradigmy v iazykoznanii [Cultural linguistics, linguistic identity, a concept: the establishment of an anthropocentric paradigm in linguistics]. Filologicheskie nauki – Philology Sciences, no. 1 (2001): 64 – 72.
4. Golev N. D. Dinamicheskii aspekt leksicheskoi motivatsii [The dynamic aspect of lexical motivation]. Tomsk: Izdatel'stvo Tomskogo universiteta, 1989, 252.
5. Zhanalina L.K. Integrativnoe slovoobrazovanie: monografiia [Integrative word formation: monograph]. Almaty: KazNPU im. Abaia, 2011. 492 s.
6. Zhanalina L. K. Sovremennaia lingvistika: poliparadigmal'nost' i tendentsii razvitiia [Modern Linguistics: multiparadigmatic character and tendencies of development]. Nauchnyi progress na rubezhe tysiacheletii: mater. mezhdunar. nauchno-praktich. Konferentsii [Scientific progress on the Millennium: Proc. Intern. Sc.-Prac. Conf.]. Praga: Education and Science, 2010, 98 – 102.
7. Zhanalina L. K., Kilevaia L. T., Kasymova R. T., Maimakova A. D., Abaeva M. K. Iazyk sovremennoi nauki: Iazykovye portrety [The language of modern science: Language portraits]. Ed. Zhanalina L. K. Almaty, 2010, 344.
8. Karaulov Iu. N. Russkii iazyk i iazykovaia lichnost' [Russian language and linguistic identity]. Moscow: Nauka, 1987, 262.
9. Kubriakova E. V. Evoliutsiia lingvisticheskikh idei vo vtoroi polovine XX veka (opyt paradigmal'nogo analiza) [Evolution of linguistic ideas in the second half of the XX century (the experience of paradigmatic analysis)]. Iazyk i nauka kontsa XX veka [Language and science end of the XX century]. Moscow: Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet, 1995, 144 – 238.
10. Maikov V. V. Integral'nyi podkhod Kena Uilbera [The integral approach of Ken Wilber]. Kholizm i zdorov'e – Holism and Health, no. 1 (2009). Available at: http://www.holiz.ru/index.php/maykov (accessed 13.02.2016).
11. Maslova V. A. Lingvokul'turologiia [Cultural linguistics]. Moscow: Akademiia, 2001, 208.
12. Uilber K. Vvedenie v integral'nuiu teoriiu i praktiku: osnovy IOS i «vsesektornoi, vseurovnevoi» karty [Introduction to Integral Theory and practice: the basics of ITS and "all-quadrant, all-level" card] [Elektronnyi resurs]. AQAL, 1, no. 1 (2006). Available at: http://psylib.ukrweb.net/books/uilbk03/index.htm (accessed 13.02.2016).
13. Uilber K. Integral'naia psikhologiia: Soznanie, Dukh, Psikhologiia, Terapiia [Integral Psychology: Consciousness, Spirit, Psychology, Therapy]. Transl. and ed. Kiselev A. Moscow: ACT, 2004, 412. Available at: http://mreadz.com/new/index.php? id=273686 (accessed 10.01.2016)
14. Ufimtseva N. V. Iazykovoe soznanie: dinamika i variativnost' [Language consciousness: the dynamics and variability]. Moscow: Institut iazykoznaniia RAN, 2011, 252.
15. Fot L. V. Integrativnye modeli opisaniia teksta [Integrative model of description text]. Nauchnaia industriia evropeiskogo kontinenta: Mat-ly mezhdunar. nauchno-prakt. konf. [The scientific industry of the European continent: Proc. Intern. Sc.-Prac. Conf.]. Praga: Education and Science, vol. Filologicheskie nauki (2013): 93 – 100.
Review
For citations:
Zhanalina L.K., Fot L.V. LINGUISTICS SEEKING SUBJECT. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2016;(3):124-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2016-3-124-128
Views:
692
Email this article 