PSYCHOLOGICAL DIAGNOSTICS OF PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS USING K. PEARSON AND H. MARR’S “12 ARCHETYPES” TEST
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2016-2-93-101
Abstract
The archetype of the personality is studied from the position of the culturological analysis, but its psychological component is not investigated. It should be noted that the archetype is capable to predetermine the behavior of the person; therefore, researching of an archetype of the personality is topical. The paper presents the results of the empirical research conducted with the help of “12 archetypes” test (K. Pearson and H. Marr). This test defines the dominating archetype of the personality, but its results are low-informative. 120 students of the Pacific State Medical University (60 young men and 60 girls at the age of 20 – 25 years) participated in the research. In the research “12 archetypes” test (K. Pearson and H. Marr), Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, R. Kettell’s Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (Form C) and V. I. Garbuzov’s questionnaire for diagnostics of the dominating instinct were used. The results allowed expanding the test. Detailed descriptive characteristics of each archetype of Pearson’s system were received.
References
1. Agavelian O. K., Perevozkin S. B., Perevozkina Iu. M. Verbal'no-vizual'nye kharakteristiki arkhetipov v sovremennykh predstavleniiakh lichnosti [Verbally-visual characteristics of archetypes in modern representations of the person abstract]. Sibirskii vestnik spetsial'nogo obrazovaniia – Siberian messenger of vocational education, no. 1(3) (2011): 17 – 27.
2. Garbuzov V. I. Prakticheskaia psikhoterapiia, ili kak vernut' rebenku i podrostku uverennost' v sebe, istinnoe dostoinstvo i zdorov'e [Practical psychotherapy or how to return to the child and the teenager self-confidence, true advantage and health]. Moscow: Sphera, 1994.
3. Zarubko E. Iu. Arkhetipy v obydennom soznanii [The archetypes in the everyday awareness]. Vestnik IuzhnoUral'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Messenger of the South Ural State University, no. 10(27) (2010): 37 – 43.
4. Kravtsova N. A., Katasonova A. V., Dovzhenko A. Iu., Denisova V. A., Rabovaliuk L. N. Faktory i mekhanizmy razvitiia psikhosomaticheskikh rasstroistv [Factors and mechanisms of psychosomatic disorders]. Tikhookeanskii meditsinskii zhurnal – Pacific medical magazine, no. 4 (2013): 48 – 55.
5. Mark M., Pearson C. Geroi i buntar'. Sozdanie brenda s pomoshch'iu arkhetipov [The hero and the outlaw. Building extraordinary brands through the power of archetypes]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter, 2005.
6. Perevozkina Iu. M., Dmitrieva N. V., Perevozkin S. B., Riumina T. V., Ganpantsurova O. B. Postroenie konstrukta dlia izucheniia dominantnogo arkhetipa [Creation of construct for studying of the dominant archetype]. Sibirskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal – Siberian pedagogical magazine, no. 3 (2013): 213 – 217.
7. Rukavishnikov A. A., Sokolova V. M. Faktornyi lichnostnyi oprosnik R. Cattell: metodicheskoe rukovodstvo [Factorial personal questionnaire of R. Cattell]. Saint-Petersburg: IMATON, 2001.
8. Shalaeva T. I. Ispol'zovanie tipologicheskogo oprosnika Maeirs-Briggs v praktike rabotnikov sluzhby zaniatosti: [Use of a typological questionnaire of Mayeyrs-Briggs in practice of workers of an employment service]. Saratov: PMUC, 2002.
9. Jung C. G. Arkhetip i simvol [Archetype and symbol]. Moscow: Renessans. 1991.
10. Jung C. G. Psikhologicheskie tipy [Psychological types]. Moscow: Azbuka. 2001.
Review
For citations:
Kapustina T.V. PSYCHOLOGICAL DIAGNOSTICS OF PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS USING K. PEARSON AND H. MARR’S “12 ARCHETYPES” TEST. The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2016;(2):93-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2016-2-93-101
Views:
1168
Email this article 