LECTURER’S PERSONALITY AS A MODEL OF PROFESSIONAL FORMATION OF STUDENT’S PERSONALITY
Abstract
The paper presents the results of a research of the impact of lecturer’s personality on professional development of future railwaymen and lecturers. It opens and justifies as exemplified by modern research the role of the lecturer’s personality not only as a carrier and transmitter of professional knowledge and skills that are necessary for training professionals, but as a mentor, tutor of the future professional and at the same time as a "model" of a professional, as a representative of the advanced part of professionals – masters in their field.
The research is based on the study of subjective well-being of first-year students and graduate students as representatives of “human-technology” and “human-human” types of professions, as an integrative indicator of the quality of professional formation. Results of the study allow to consider special aspects of professional formation in such criteria as: motivation for choice of profession, adaptation to educational activity, specifics of formation of professionally important qualities, special aspects of interaction in the lecturer-student system and attitude to occupation. The main conclusion confirming the results of numerous studies is that the lecturer’s personality as model of a professional providing vocational training plays a significant role in the process of formation of a professional’s personality. Discussion of research results includes practical advice about the organization of psychological support for professional formation of student's personality taking into account the specificity of professional distinctiveness.
About the Authors
M. V. SokolskayaRussian Federation
Marina V. Sokolskaya – Doctor of Psychology, Associate Professor, Head the Department of General, Legal and Engineering Psychology, Professor
O. O. Olifer
Russian Federation
Olga O. Olifer – post-graduate student; Director of Regional Center
References
1. Абульханова-Славская К. А. Стратегия жизни. М.: Мысль, 1991. 299 с.
2. Иванов М. С., Яницкий М. С. К проблеме оценки потенциала самореализации личности в процессе обучения // Философия образования. 2004. № 3(11). С. 233 – 241.
3. Сокольская М. В. Психосемантический анализ отношения к профессии операторов – поездных диспетчеров // Психологическая наука и образование. 2007. № 4. С. 52 – 61.
4. Сокольская М. В. Личностное здоровье профессионала. Хабаровск: Изд-во ДВГУПС, 2008. 303 с.
5. Сокольская М. В. Субъективное благополучие студентов – парадоксы особенностей профессионального образования // Гуманитарность современного образования: психолого-педагогические парадоксы: сб. науч. тр.. Хабаровск: Изд-во ДВГГУ, 2009. С. 139 – 150.
6. Сокольская М. В. Личностое здоровье профессионала: автореф. дис. ... д-ра психол. наук. Хабаровск, 2012. 50 с.
7. Сыманюк Э. Э. Психология профессионально-обусловленных кризисов. М.: Воронеж, 2004. 319 с.
8. Яницкий М. С. Основные психологические механизмы адаптации студентов к учебной деятельности: дис. … канд. психол. наук. Кемерово, 1995. 144 с.
9. Яницкий М. С. Модификация методики Р. Инглхарта для изучения ценностной структуры массового сознания // Сибирская психология сегодня: сб. тр. Кемерово: Кузбассвузиздат, 2002. С. 189 – 195.
10. Якобсон П. М. Психологические компоненты и критерии становления зрелой личности // Психологический журнал. 1981. № 4.
Review
For citations:
Sokolskaya M.V., Olifer O.O. LECTURER’S PERSONALITY AS A MODEL OF PROFESSIONAL FORMATION OF STUDENT’S PERSONALITY. SibScript. 2014;(3-1):143-147. (In Russ.)