PERCEPTION OF THE UNIVERSITY’S EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT BY STUDENTS WITH DIFFERENT MANIFESTATION DEGREES OF IMPLICIT INTELLIGENCE AND PERSONALITY THEORIES
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to discover the correlation between students‘ subjective evaluation of the feasibility of the basic values in the university educational environment and the degree of manifestation of their implicit theories of intelligence and personality. In order to study implicit theories we used the questionnaire by K. Dweck modified by T. V. Kornilova and S. D. Smirnov, as well as a method of subjective evaluation of feasibility of basic values (SEFBV) developed by S. A. Bogomaz. For the studied students‘ group we calculated the profile of basic values and the profile of these values feasibility in the university environment. The profiles analysis shows that the university environment contributes to the implementation of professional values, but the students rank the values of ―family‖, ―love‖ and ―health‖ as important. It was proved that the university environment is characterized by a significant ―gap‖ between the importance and feasibility of the value ―to be healthy‖. We found significant correlation between the parameters of implicit theories and evaluation of feasibility of basic values. The acquired results broaden the idea of personal-environment interaction and may be taken into account when creating the university environment which would ensure personal and professional development of young people to the maximum extent. It can be concluded that students with implicit theories of augmenting intelligence and enriched personality tend to have a positive attitude to milieu conditions that have developed in the university educational environment. The milieu properties may be quantified using the SEFBV technique. Analysis of the ―gap‖ between the importance and feasibility of values in the university environment will provide important information about the peculiarities of individual-environment interaction.
About the Authors
S. A. BogomazRussian Federation
Sergey A. Bogomaz – Doctor of Psychology, Full Professor, Head of the Department of Organizational Psychology
O. Yu. Gorchakova
Russian Federation
Olesya Yu. Gorchakova – Senior Lecturer at the Department of Organizational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology
T. Ye. Levitskaya
Russian Federation
Tatiana Ye. Levitskaya – Candidate of Medical Psychology, Assistant Professor at the Department of Genetic and Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology
A. A. Sheketera
Russian Federation
Anastasia A. Sheketera – post-graduate student at the Faculty of Psychology
References
1. Абакумова Н. Н., Богомаз С. А. Мониторинг образовательных результатов в вузе: проблема содержания психолого-педагогической диагностики // Психология обучения. 2015. № 3. С. 62 – 68.
2. Аллахвердов М. В. Принцип проверяемости имплицитных теорий // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского государственного университета. (Серия 12: Психология, социология, педагогика). Вып. 3. СПб, 2011. С. 14 – 19.
3. Богомаз С. А., Тренькаева Н. А. Модель личностного развития в юношеском возрасте по варианту гиперсоциализации // Сибирский психол. журн. 2007. Вып. 26. С. 55 – 61.
4. Богомаз С. А., Мацута В. В. Субъективная оценка реализуемости базисных ценностей в городской среде // Сибирский психол. журн. 2012. № 46. С. 67 – 75.
5. Корнилова Т. В., Смирнов С. Д., Чумакова М. А., Корнилов С. А., Новотоцкая-Власова Е. В. Модификация опросников К. Двек в контексте изучения академических достижений студентов // Психологический журнал. 2008. Т. 29. № 3. С. 86 – 100.
6. Литвина С. А., Богомаз С. А., Галай И. А., Айзман Р. И. Особенности личностно-обусловленного восприятия вузовской молодежью среды города (на материале исследований в Иркутске, Томске и Куйбышеве) // Психология в экономике и управлении. 2014. № 1(11). С. 106 – 111.
7. Равен Дж. Педагогическое тестирование: Проблемы, заблуждения, перспективы / пер. с англ. Изд. 2-е, испр. М.: Когито-Центр, 2001. 142 с.
8. Розум С. И. Психология социализации и социальной адаптации человека. СПб., 2006. 362 с.
9. Dweck C. S., Chiu C., Hong Y. Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model // Psychological Inquiry. Vol. 6(4). P. 322 – 333.
10. Hong Y., Chiu C., Dweck C. S. Implicit Theories of Intelligence / Efficacy, Agency, and Self-Esteem // The Springer Series in Social Clinical Psychology. 1995. P. 197 – 216.
Review
For citations:
Bogomaz S.A., Gorchakova O.Yu., Levitskaya T.Ye., Sheketera A.A. PERCEPTION OF THE UNIVERSITY’S EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT BY STUDENTS WITH DIFFERENT MANIFESTATION DEGREES OF IMPLICIT INTELLIGENCE AND PERSONALITY THEORIES. SibScript. 2015;(3-3):88-92. (In Russ.)