Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

METHODOLOGICAL POSSIBILITIES OF STRUCTURAL APPROACH IN HUMANITARIAN COGNITION

Abstract

The paper discusses the origins and formation of the structural approach to humanitarians cognition. It is understood as a result of the "Copernican revolution" of I. Kant that developed in the process of clarifying the specifics of humanitarians cognition committed in theories of neokantianism, pragmatism, structuralism, Gestalt-psychology, analytic philosophy and others. It is proved that the structure of the inner form serves as the base of the integrity of things, thus structural approach is opposed to elementarism. The key role of the structural approach in the development of structuralism is proved, where the structural approach generated a detailed structural methodology. The authors show the place of linguistic researches in the study of symbolic forms of culture which, although not confined to language, are still rather often caused by them. In turn, the author determines the meaning of structuralism for linguistics, which owes its scientific status to structuralism. The authors describe the development of structuralism and its limited set of methodological possibilities, which led to the overcoming of its hegemony in humanitarians cognition, which does not mean that the structural approach is limited as such.

About the Authors

M. N. Shcherbinin
Tyumen State University
Russian Federation
Mikhail N. Shcherbinin – Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Head of the Department of Philosophy


A. I. Pavlovskiy
Tyumen State University
Russian Federation
Alexey I. Pavlovskiy – Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Assistant professor at the Department of Philosophy


I. N. Pupysheva
Tyumen State University
Russian Federation
Irina N. Pupysheva – Candidate of Philosophy, Assistant Professor at the Department of Philosophy


References

1. Алпатов В. М. История лингвистических учений. М., 2005. 368 с. Режим доступа: //http://coollib.com/b/235312/read (дата обращения: 25.10.2014).

2. Витгенштейн Л. Логико-философский трактат // Философские работы. Ч. I. М.: Гнозис, 1994.

3. Греймас А.-Ж. Структурная семантика: поиск метода. М.: Академический Проект, 2004. 368 с.

4. Диалектическая логика. М.: Издательство Московского университета, 1986. 296 с.

5. Зотов А. Ф. Современная западная философия. М.: Высшая школа, 2001. 784 с.

6. Кант И. Критика чистого разума. М.: Мысль, 1994. 591 с.

7. Кассирер Э. Философия символических форм. Т. I: Язык. М.: Академический проект, 2011.271 с.

8. Кассирер Э. Философия символических форм. Т. III: Феноменология познания. М.: Академический проект, 2011. 398 с.

9. Общее языкознание. Внутренняя структура языка. М., 1972. 565 с.

10. Реформатский А. А. Принципы синхронного описания языка // Реформатский А. А. Лингвистика и поэтика. М., 1987. С. 20 – 40. Режим доступа: //http://www.philology.ru/linguistics1/reformatskiy-87a.htm (дата обращения: 26.10.1014).

11. Современная западная философия: учебное пособие. Минск: Книжный дом, 2009. 1024 с.

12. Соссюр Ф. де Курс общей лингвистики. Екатеринбург, 1999. 432 с. Режим доступа: //http://login.ru/books/kurs-obsheiy-lingvistiki-sossyur-f-de-professii (дата обращения: 25.10.2014).


Review

For citations:


Shcherbinin M.N., Pavlovskiy A.I., Pupysheva I.N. METHODOLOGICAL POSSIBILITIES OF STRUCTURAL APPROACH IN HUMANITARIAN COGNITION. SibScript. 2014;(4-3):224-227. (In Russ.)

Views: 392


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)