Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

THE METACONCEPTS OF “POEM IN PROSE” AND “INTERNET-MINIATURE” AS THE BASIS OF GENRES COMPARISON

Abstract

The theory of speech genres developed in the cognitive aspect. The models of the genre are studied in metalinguistic awareness. The paper focuses on the models of the concepts of “poem in prose” and “Internet-miniature”" In order to test the hypothesis that there is a similarity between the two small prosaic emotional and lyrical genres, a comparative analysis of representations in metalinguistic awareness was carried out. The material for the study was the statements obtained in the course of psycholinguistic experiments and directed surveys of the authors. The author considers 376 associative reactions to the stimulus “poem in prose” and 1968 linguistic units comprising metalinguistic statements about Internetminiatures. Metalinguistic approach helps identify the signs fixed in to metalinguistic awareness in a bigger or smaller degree. The models provide a basis for comparison of the two genres, despite different communicative spheres and sociocultural importance. The comparative analysis proves the thesis of a close proximity of their cognitive structures.

About the Author

A. A. Dolganina
Tomsk State University
Russian Federation
Anna A. Dolganina – Candidate of Philology, Senior Lecturer at the Department of the Russian language


References

1. Бахтин М. М. Проблема речевых жанров // Эстетика словесного творчества. М.: Искусство, 1986. С. 250 – 297.

2. Литературный энциклопедический словарь / под общ. ред. В. М. Кожевникова, П. А. Николаева. М.: Сов. Энциклопедия, 1987. 750 с.

3. Меньшикова С. И. Соотношение понятий «концепт» и «метаконцепт» // Вестник Тверского государственного университета. (Серия 9: Филология). 2007. № 24. С. 53 – 60.

4. Орлицкий Ю. Б. Стих и проза в русской литературе: очерки истории и теории. Воронеж: Изд-во ВГУ, 1991. 200 с.

5. Плотникова А. А. Лирическая миниатюра в интернет-коммуникации (лингвопрагматический и метаязыковой аспект жанра): автореф. дис. … канд. филол. наук. Томск, 2012. 28 с.

6. Слышкин Г. Г. Лингвокультурные концепты и метаконцепты: дис. … д-ра филол. наук. Волгоград, 2004.

7. Слышкин Г. Г. Речевой жанр: перспективы концептологического анализа // Жанры речи: Вып. 4. Жанр и концепт. Саратов: Изд-во ГосУНЦ «Колледж», 2005. С. 34 – 50.

8. Тынянов Ю. Н. Поэтика. История литературы. Кино. М.: Наука, 1977. 576 с.

9. Bax S. Discourse and Genre: Analysing Language in Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 224 p.

10. Newsom C. A. Pairing Research Questions and Theories of Genre: A Case Study of the Hodayot // Dead Sea Discoveries. 2010. № 17. P. 270 – 288.


Review

For citations:


Dolganina A.A. THE METACONCEPTS OF “POEM IN PROSE” AND “INTERNET-MINIATURE” AS THE BASIS OF GENRES COMPARISON. SibScript. 2015;(4-1):129-133. (In Russ.)

Views: 354


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)