Preview

SibScript

Advanced search

Global Britain in the New World Order

https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2026-28-3-582-590

EDN: ZXGXMH

Abstract

As the unipolar world gives way to a new multipolar order, several independent centers of influence have begun to compete for global prominence. In this changing landscape, post-Brexit Great Britain must reshape its foreign policy as an independent sovereign state, a shift highlighted by the March 2021 government review that introduced the concept of Global Britain. This article examines Britain’s pursuit of leadership within this multipolar framework. Grounded in the principles of historicism and objectivism, the study employs comparative historical and problem-chronological analyses to identify the historical prerequisites of the Global Britain vision as a justification for Brexit, alongside the shifting dynamics within the British-American Special Relationship. By deconstructing the core tenets of this concept, the article highlights Britain’s primary achievements on its global trajectory, including active geopolitics in the post-Soviet space, strategic economic partnerships with Kazakhstan, a reset of relations with the European Union amidst Donald Trump’s trade tariffs, and its role as a key coordinator of relief efforts in Ukraine. Ultimately, as a leading global economy, nuclear power, and a permanent member of the UN Security Council, G7, and G20, Great Britain continues to expand its global ambitions.

About the Author

Tatyana N. Cherkashina
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation

Omsk


Competing Interests:

The author declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.



References

1. Aleshin A. A., Kislitsyn S. V. Brexit and the future of the special relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom. Lomonosov World Politics Journal, 2019, 11(1): 138–171. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tlxzcg

2. Andreeva T. N. British-American "special relationship" at the Brexit beginning (July 2016 – the beginning of 2018). Britain: History, Culture, Education: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., Yaroslavl, 13–14 Sep 2018. Yaroslavl: YSPU, 2018, iss. 4, 26–34. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ysrwjf

3. Atamanov S. Behind-the-scenes games of the British crown. Geopolitika, 20 Jul 2022. (In Russ.) URL: https://www.geopolitika.ru/article/podkovernye-igry-britanskoy-korony?utm_referrer=https%3a%2f%2fwww.bing.com%2f (accessed 27 Feb 2025).

4. Bogdasarova T. Transformation of the concept of Global Britain after Brexit. Russian International Affairs Council, 21 May 2020. (In Russ.) URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/columns/europeanpolicy/transformatsiya-kontseptsii-globalnaya-britaniya-posle-brexit/ (accessed 22 Mar 2025).

5. Bolshakov А. V. The actual problems of the UK-US trade relationship. World and National Economy, 2021, (3). (In Russ.) URL: https://mirec.mgimo.ru/2021/2021-03/actual-problems-uk-us-trade (accessed 21 Mar 2025). https://elibrary.ru/xswspy

6. Godovanyuk K. About the special relationship between Great Britain and the United States in an era of change. Analytical notes of Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences, 2017, (76). (In Russ.) URL: http://www.zapiski-ieran.ru/images/analitika/an76.pdf (accessed 4 Apr 2025).

7. Grebenshchikov V. E. Modern international relations in the context of the Ukrainian crisis. The International Affairs, 2024, (12): 32–37. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/eqreot

8. Gromyko A. A., Aivazyan A. S., Alekseenkova E. S., Ananieva E. V., Babynina L. O., Belov V. B. et al. The stage of the special military operation in Ukraine. The anatomy of the anti-Russia policy in Europe. Moscow: IE RAS, 2022, 194. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15211/report42022_390

9. Davitadze M. D. The foundations of the coexistence of a unipolar and multipolar world. Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2023, (4): 75–77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0454-2023-4-75-77

10. Kadomtsev A. Old friends or new rivals: How are relations between the European Union and Great Britain going to develop? The International Affairs, 11 Jan 2021. (In Russ.) URL: https://interaffairs.ru/news/show/28689 (accessed 8 Apr 2025).

11. Kamynin V. D. The historical memory of the Great Patriotic War as a factor in shaping of the public consciousness. Izvestia Ural Federal University. Series 1. Issues in Education, Science and Culture, 2011, (1): 59–65. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/neuyfn

12. Sokolova A. Brexit seven years later. Why does Brexit disappoint the British? Political and economic development of Great Britain after Brexit. Russian International Affairs Council, 20 Jul 2023. (In Russ.) URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/blogs/a-sokolova/brexit-sem-let-spustya-pochemu-vykhod-iz-es-razocharoval-britantsev-po/ (accessed 13 Mar 2025).

13. Soloviev E. G. Sovereignty within the polycentric world order: Return to the roots. The International Affairs, 2014, (6): 95–110. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uznpdn

14. Stepanova C. N. Post-Brexit UK. Economics, applied computer science, and humanities: Modern trends and development prospects: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Moscow, 14 Apr 2021. Moscow: AL&SR, 2021, 344–350. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/doefnu

15. Khakhalkina E. V. "Global Britain": From idea to implementation. Sovremennaya Evropa, 2021, (1): 21–32. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope120212132

16. Khlopov O. A. Special relationship of the US and the UK under Trump аnd Biden. USA & Canada: Economics – Politics – Culture, 2022, (5): 20–33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686673022050029

17. Cherkashina T. N. Modern global Great Britain: A formal player or a shadow leader? Herald of Omsk University. Series "Historical Studies", 2024, 11(3): 53–59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24147/2312-1300.2024.11(3).53-59

18. Shumilov M. M. Increasing the role of Great Britain in the South Caucasus in the context of the Second Karabakh war. Regional policy, political geography, and geopolitics: History and modernity: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., St. Petersburg, 22–23 Apr 2022. St. Petersburg: VVM, 2022, 631–640. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jomoib

19. Alcaro R. The West, multipolarity, and the liberal order. Brookings, 10 Apr 2015. URL: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-west-multipolarity-and-the-liberal-order/ (accessed 15 Apr 2025).

20. Bacevich A. J. The limits of power. The end of American exceptionalism. New York: Holt Paperbacks, 2009, 206.

21. Blagden D. Power, polarity, and prudence: The ambiguities and implications of UK discourse on a multipolar international system. Defence Studies, 2019, 19(3): 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2019.1643243

22. Buzan B. From international to world society? English school theory and the social structure of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 294.

23. Filipović A. Vaccine diplomacy during the COVID-19 pandemic on the example of the Republic of Serbia. SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2022, (1). https://doi.org/10.25136/1339-3057.2022.1.36731

24. Kurowska X. Multipolarity as resistance to liberal norms: Russia's position on responsibility to protect. Conflict, Security & Development, 2014, 14(4): 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2014.930589

25. Riddervold M., Newsome A. Transatlantic relations in times of uncertainty: Crises and EU-US relations. Journal of European Integration, 2018, 40(5): 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1488839


Review

For citations:


Cherkashina T.N. Global Britain in the New World Order. SibScript. 2026;28(3):582–590. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2026-28-3-582-590. EDN: ZXGXMH

Views: 19

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-2122 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2092 (Online)