Impoliteness in Online News Discourse: Evidence from BBC News Facebook Comments
https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2026-28-1-12-23
EDN: HVXLRA
Abstract
This study investigates impoliteness in the comment section of the BBC English News website, focusing on the types of conventionalized impolite triggers used by commenters. It also examines the influence of computermediated factors, including anonymity and synchronicity, on impolite behavior. J. Culpeper’s bottom-up model of impoliteness triggers (2011, 2016) was applied to classify impolite acts. Using a mixed-method approach, we analyzed 115 comments containing 170 impolite strategies. Our findings reveal that commenters frequently targeted writers, politicians, and the BBC itself. Insults and pointed criticisms were their most common strategies, while silencers and threats were used least often. Among threats, personalized negative vocatives were most frequent, while personalized negative assertions and references were least common. Our analysis further shows that anonymity, synchronicity, and emotional expression significantly shape the manifestation of impoliteness in online comments.
About the Authors
Derki Noureddine
University of Mustapha Stambouli Mascara
Algeria
Competing Interests:
Algeria
Mascara
Scopus Author ID: 59256761200
Competing Interests:
The authors declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
Bedda Noureddine
University of Mustapha Stambouli Mascara
Algeria
Competing Interests:
Algeria
Mascara
Competing Interests:
The authors declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
Selmane Souheyla
Southwest University
China
Competing Interests:
China
Chongqing
Competing Interests:
The authors declared no potential conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and / or publication of this article.
References
1. Austin P. Politeness revisited: The dark side. New Zealand ways of speaking English, eds. Bell A., Holmes J. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters, 1990, 277–297.
2. Bou-Franch P., Blitvich P. G.-C. Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube. Journal of Pragmatics, 2014, 73: 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001
3. Bousfield D. Beginnings, middles, and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges. Journal of Pragmatics, 2007, 39(12): 2185–2216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005
4. Bousfield D. Impoliteness in the struggle for power. Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, eds. Bousfield D., Locher M. A. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008, vol. 21, 127–153.
5. Brown P., Levinson S. C. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, vol. 4, 360. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
6. Cashman H. Impoliteness in children's interactions in a Spanish / English bilingual community of practice. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, 2006, 2(2): 217–246. https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2006.012
7. Culpeper J. Conventionalised impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics, 2010, 42(12): 3232–3245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007
8. Culpeper J. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 306.
9. Culpeper J. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The weakest link. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, 2005, 1(1): 35–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
10. Culpeper J. Impoliteness strategies. Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society. Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology, eds. Capone A., Mey J. L. Springer International Publishing, 2016, vol. 4, 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_16
11. Culpeper J. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 1996, 25(3): 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3
12. Culpeper J., Bousfield D., Wichmann A. Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 2003, 35(10-11): 1545–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2
13. Economidou-Kogetsidis M. Variation in evaluations of the (im)politeness of emails from L2 learners and perceptions of the personality of their senders. Journal of Pragmatics, 2016, 106: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.10.001
14. García-Pastor M. D. Political campaign debates as zero-sum games: Impoliteness and power in candidates' exchanges. Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, eds. Bousfield D., Locher M. A. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008, vol. 21, 101–123.
15. Hammod N. M., Abdul-Rassul A. Impoliteness strategies in English and Arabic Facebook comments. International Journal of Linguistics, 2017, 9(5): 97–112. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v9i5.11895
16. Hardaker C., McGlashan M. "Real men don’t hate women": Twitter rape threats and group identity. Journal of Pragmatics, 2016, 91: 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005
17. Harris S. Epilogue: Facework and im/politeness across legal contexts. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, 2011, 7(1): 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2011.007
18. Henrich N., Holmes B. Web news readers' comments: Towards developing a methodology for using on-line comments in social inquiry. Journal of Media and Communication Studies, 2013, 5(1): 1–4.
19. Herring S. C. Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives. John Benjamins Publishing, 1996, vol. 39, 324.
20. Herring S. C. Computer-mediated communication on the Internet. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2002, 36(1): 109–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440360104
21. Ibrahim A. H. A Socio-Linguistic Analysis of Impoliteness in Political Tweets. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 2020, 11(1): 64–79. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17405.10729
22. Kienpointner M. Impoliteness and emotional arguments. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, 2008, 4(2): 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2008.012
23. Kotthoff H. Impoliteness and conversational joking: On relational politics. Folia Linguistica, 1996, 30(3-4): 299–326. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1996.30.3-4.299
24. Lakoff R. Language and women’s place. Language in Society, 1973, 2(1): 45–80. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/S0047404500000051
25. Larina T., Ponton D. M. I wanted to honour your journal, and you spat in my face: Emotive (im)politeness and face in the English and Russian blind peer review. Journal of Politeness Research, 2022, 18(1): 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2019-0035
26. Lee E.-J., Jang Y. J. What do others’ reactions to news on internet portal sites tell us? Effects of presentation format and readers’ need for cognition on reality perception. Communication Research, 2010, 37(6): 825–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210376189
27. Leech G. N. Principles of pragmatics. Longman, 1983, 250.
28. Locher M. A., Bousfield D. Impoliteness and power in language. Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, eds. Bousfield D., Locher M. A. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008, vol. 21, 1–16.
29. Locher M. A., Watts R. J. Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, eds. Bousfield D., Locher M. A. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008, vol. 21, 77–99.
30. Lorenzo-Dus N. "You're barking mad; I'm out": Impoliteness and broadcast talk. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, 2009, 5(2): 159–187. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2009.010
31. Mak B. C. N., Chui H. L. Impoliteness in Facebook status updates: Strategic talk among colleagues "outside" the workplace. Text & Talk, 2014, 34(2): 165-185. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0042
32. Neurauter-Kessels M. Im/polite reader responses on British online news sites. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, 2011, 7(2): 187–214. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2011.010
33. Postmes T. R., Spears R., Lea M. Breaching or building social boundaries: SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 1998, 25(6): 689–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025006006
34. Reich Z. User comments: The transformation of participatory space. In: Singer J. B., Hermida A., Domingo D., Heinonen A., Paulussen S., Quandt T., Reich Z., Vujnovic M. Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers. John Wiley & Sons, 2011, 96–117.
35. Rizana M., Murni S. M., Zein T. T. Impolite reader responses on online news comments in viva.co.id. Linguistik Terapan, 2018, 15(1): 33–39. https://doi.org/10.24114/lt.v15i1.11274
36. Sampietro A. Emojis and rapport management in Spanish WhatsApp chats. Journal of Pragmatics, 2019, 143: 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.009
37. Santana A. D. Virtuous or vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. Journalism Practice, 2014, 8(1): 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.813194
38. Shinta V., Mara H., Wahyuni D. Impoliteness strategies used by supporters and dictators of Ahok in their online comments differed by gender. E-Journal of English Language & Literature, 2018, 7(1): 225–236.
39. Suhaila I., Mono U., Lubis S. Impolite reader’s responses on online BBC News comments. JAMI: Jurnal Ahli Muda Indonesia, 2022, 3(2): 184–197. https://doi.org/10.46510/jami.v3i2.122
40. Terkourafi M. Beyond the micro-level in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, 2005, 1(2): 237–262. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237
41. Terkourafi M. Generalised and particularised implicatures of politeness. Perspectives on dialogue in the new millennium, eds. Kühnlein H., Reiser H., Zeevat H. John Benjamins, 2003, 151–166.
42. Terkourafi M. Politeness and formulaicity: Evidence from Cypriot Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 2002, 3(1): 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.3.08ter
43. Trice M. How we comment on web journalism: A case study on dialogue found in news articles. The ethics of emerging media: Information, social norms, and new media technology, eds. Drushel B. E., German K. A&C Black, 2011, 235–250.
44. Watts R. J. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 304.
45. Wenger E. Communities and practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, 336. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
46. Yang H. The effects of the opinion and quality of user postings on Internet news readers’ attitude toward the news issue. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 2008, 52(2): 254–281.
47. Zamith R., Lewis S. C. From public spaces to public sphere: Rethinking systems for reader comments on online news sites. Digital Journalism, 2014, 2(4): 558–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.882066
Review
For citations:
Noureddine D., Noureddine B., Souheyla S. Impoliteness in Online News Discourse: Evidence from BBC News Facebook Comments. SibScript. 2026;28(1):12-23. https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2026-28-1-12-23. EDN: HVXLRA
Views:
218
JATS XML
Email this article 